HOME | DD
Balddog4 β The U.S Constitution
Published: 2012-02-26 01:55:04 +0000 UTC; Views: 5498; Favourites: 148; Downloads: 45
Redirect to original
Description
What more can I say, except that our Fore-Fathers will be disgusted with the way our Country is right now. I wouldn't be suprise if they are rolling in their graves sick with the way we treat our Constitution. The U.S Constitution is a foundation that our Country is set apon. Something that they risked their lives for. They knew what the Deculation of Independance and Constitution would do for the world, and what it would do for the people. We don't know what it was like living under another country's rule, but I do know that it wasn't something the People of the United States or the Colonies wanted to live. If we understand the Constitution, we'll learn what our Fore-Fathers sought for.Related content
Comments: 112
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
What about the Fourth Amendment, a part of the Constitution which the Trump Administration is basically using as toilet paper?
π: 1 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 1 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
The US is Britain's abandoned child, who grew up a crackhead.
This document is its birth certificate.
Canada should have annihilated us in the War of 1812.
π: 1 β©: 1
Damn. I don't agree with you 100% but that was fucking savage. I love it.
π: 0 β©: 0
The foundation for slavery and rich white Christians. But I personally do not care.
π: 0 β©: 2
π: 0 β©: 0
If you do not care then why are you telling me this?
π: 0 β©: 1
I am not evern interact to you. I'm just sayin' what I see and know.
π: 0 β©: 1
Which is nothing.
π: 0 β©: 0
How the hell did you get my toilet paper? I've been needing to wipe my ass all day!
-Donald Trump, 2016.
(Yes, I'm kidding. Don't be an over sensitive b**ch.)
π: 0 β©: 0
Hi, I've used your image here:Β jmlsfederalists.wordpress.com/ . Please let me know if you have any concerns.
π: 0 β©: 0
Too bad politicians in BOTH parties treat the Constitution like a Chinese buffet, choosing only the parts they like and ignoring the rest of it...
π: 1 β©: 0
Finally, I found something that burns better than the U.S. flag ! :3
π: 0 β©: 0
Our "Fore-Fathers" had differing opinions on government and society. One thing to consider from even the act of the constitution is that it was an incredible act of compromise. The "Fore-Fathers" (a term I personally hate for it's ability to wrap all involved together) would not agree with me or you or the other in many of our personal beliefs.
π: 1 β©: 0
haha, love how you used sacred in this. Good self-parody.
π: 1 β©: 0
"You people don't know what freedom is, because you never lost it." -Manuel Martinez, survivor of the Castro regime
"We didn't go through all that to come back home and watch you surrender what we fought for." -Aaron Weiss, Iraq War Veteran
Here's the links if you want to see their whole speeches:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1ABw6β¦
www.youtube.com/watch?v=uamEo4β¦
π: 0 β©: 0
Except why doesn't anyone in the government actually take the time a and READ THE ENTIRE THING AND NOT THE PART THEY LIKE!!!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Great poster, always remember where we get our liberties also over here in Ireland our own Constitution celebrated its own birthday recently & apart from a few changes it's done it's job well
π: 0 β©: 0
I'd protect this to my last breath. Our founding fathers are turning in their graves at what this nation has become.
Hey US Government/Corporations who support Nazi-like Copyright enforcement and Internet Censorship! Bite my shiny metal ass!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
The U.S. Constitution is toilet paper in the eyes of Obama and Wilson...
π: 0 β©: 2
π: 1 β©: 0
Yep indeed and is toilet paper to the NSA as well.
π: 0 β©: 0
The constitution apportions slaves as 3/5th of the population for census purposes/political reasons. Fuck that noise.
π: 0 β©: 2
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
No. You are thinking of the 3/5th compromise that was created to try and please the South to keep the American nation from going to war. Seriously read history.
π: 0 β©: 1
>The Three-Fifths Compromise is found in Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3 of theΒ United States Constitution :
>Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, includingΒ those bound to Service for a Term of Years , and excludingΒ Indians Β not taxed,Β three fifths of all other Persons.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-Fiβ¦
π: 1 β©: 0
I agree with you 100% I been disgusted in how todays gov. been acting. Infringing privacy, censorship, taking away peoples firearms, shipping US companies to Foreign lands, fema camps, etc,. That is not the American way.
π: 0 β©: 1
In what way is the American government taking people's guns?
π: 0 β©: 2
π: 1 β©: 0
Let's say for instance, remember the Boston Marathon bombing and the New Orleans, well, they had federalized police barge in and take the guns from civilians (Including the rich ones) which I believe Obama had something to do with it. Now he's trying to federalize as muh states as he can so it can repeat. You should look it up on Infowars and the young trunks.
π: 0 β©: 1
What do guns have to do with the Boston Bombing? And is it worse that they did it to the rich?
π: 0 β©: 2
She's asking you to LOOK UP infowars and young trunks
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
I seen this on an infowars topic video on YT. I seen many of them. There was only a few rich people, mainly former veterans. I forgot which video that was though.
π: 0 β©: 1
I repeat: Why is it worse when rich people's guns are taken than when a middle class person's gun is taken?
π: 0 β©: 1
I never meant to say that these other rich residents who had their guns taken by federalized police were worse than middle classes. Both situations were bad. Those rich residents in New Orleans were mainly former/retired vets from that gun grabbing video I found from infowars YT channel. It's just as equally bad as the middle class people from there having their guns taken. It's also happening in Texas and and anywhere near it. Not all rich people are bad you know, not like those who work in the gov. who believe the same ordeals as Obama.
π: 0 β©: 1
What do you mean "believe the same ordeals"? And I have to say that it seems to me that the majority of wealthy persons has the most interest in their own benefit.
I don't believe that giving the rich more money (i.e., cutting their taxes) benefits the less fortunate.
π: 0 β©: 2
You're not giving them money by not taking it away from them anymore. But the government does give the corporations an opportunity to make more money when it bails out said corporations. What I don't get is how wanting to keep your hard-earned money is greedy but wanting to take everyone else's money away and spend it for your own desires is not.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, you're right: reducing someone's taxes isn't actually giving them money, but it's allowing them to retain more. And if they have income, then their untaxedΒ income increases.
And I do understand wanting to keep your money; it's just that it's not fair for someΒ people to have millions upon millions of dollars, and for others to be out on the streets with barely anything. Everyone should, of course, have the right to be rich. But, currently, taxes only cover your income up to a certain point (I think maybe $150,000?); if you make less than that, as most do,Β you have to give taxes for all your income, but if you make more than that, part of your income isn't affected. Not to mention, taking a higher percentage from the rich wouldn't harm them in the same way it would the middle class and poor--members of the upper class have more of an economic cushion in case of emergency.
π: 0 β©: 1
I understand the liberal perspective of it, but it's important to understand the employers and businesses are the ones providing all the jobs, so while a rich man isn't as affected by taxes as much as a middle class and poor class (who are also beginning to feel the burn), the middle class and poor workers are being severely affected indirectly by all the regulations and taxes because they're preventing the employers from making more money to hire more workers, get more people out of unemployment, and give people higher pays, more vacation time, etc., etc. while still having enough money to provide for themselves. So basically the government subsidies and taxings don't affect the rich guys, but they severely affect the middle and lower working classes, which creates more economic inequality not less
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>