HOME | DD

Senecal β€” s1_b

Published: 2006-10-02 02:27:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 1634; Favourites: 32; Downloads: 23
Redirect to original
Description Well, I've finally managed to find a digital frame to display the work in its native environment.
There are a few various products out there that were not necessarily intended for the use I am putting them toward but they work.

SO, what you see here is one in a series of works that will reside in such a frame, for gallery exhibition.
This is the image, there is no print size. I never intended it to be made into a hardcopy.

I love the freedom of this, saying, to hell with it, come to this world or move on.

Though I do still like quality printed versions and will continue to make them, this marks a milestone moment.
As for issues of duplication, and originality, I have some ideas to answer collector questions but for the most part, these are conversations better left for the art historians to address. I just want to make the work for the moment and truthfully, there is a bit I am still figuring out.

Thanks for checking it out. The frame is small, about 5x7 but I will have to upload some photos of it "in action". It also compliments nicely the acrylic clear custom framing style I'd developed for my archival hardcopy imagey ( which I do still love too).



Thanks for checking it out and reading all this blah blah blah stuff.
Related content
Comments: 32

babarazeem [2007-05-26 09:18:25 +0000 UTC]

Very nice

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

giadrosich [2006-10-16 19:35:51 +0000 UTC]

I commend you for your thoughts and aspirations on the whole "staying digital/going to print" aspect, and I am sure, as per your description, that you have given thought to said tranferance of images to collectors, etc.

Of course, in the near future, such devices may indeed be hand held and easily transportable, sort of a "pocket gallery" type enviroment on a much greater resolution and size than the cell phone downloads that many people currently employ.

As always, your images are complexly simplified. Or is that simply complex? Either way you cook it, it is still cool beans.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

turbinedivinity [2006-10-09 02:57:55 +0000 UTC]

Okay, i'll bite. What unit are you using as a digital frame?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Senecal In reply to turbinedivinity [2006-10-10 06:03:06 +0000 UTC]

It's made by Philips, an has what appears to be an acrylic clear frame around it. Made for photos but it will show digital files fine (which is not the case with other earlier models)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mayhem11 [2006-10-08 01:00:37 +0000 UTC]

awesome. i havent been on here in a while but i'm glad i came because your gallery looks awesome, as usual.
This one is gorgeous, the texture is very rich, the colors refreshing... very organic at first look, but there's also something chillingly mechanical about it.... the closer you look the more it looks engineered, almost like a city. I really enjoy the play on the organic/mechanical elements. nice job.


cheers.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

invertedbeliever [2006-10-05 04:21:38 +0000 UTC]

Is this one oil painting?? I like the color of this one. Wish I could see the original one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Senecal In reply to invertedbeliever [2006-10-05 04:28:51 +0000 UTC]

This is the original, actually. It is a purely digital work, never intended to be printed.
I have a digital frame that will display the image.

Thanks for stopping by to see it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

invertedbeliever In reply to Senecal [2006-10-05 05:29:47 +0000 UTC]

Oh that is great. I thought it was a painting. It does look like one by the way. I like it a lot.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

dead-but-smiling [2006-10-04 09:53:55 +0000 UTC]

I would fave it thrice, if I could. Chillingly stunning, as always

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Senecal In reply to dead-but-smiling [2006-10-10 05:31:25 +0000 UTC]

Hey thanks. It is always good to hear from ya!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SleepingTrinity [2006-10-03 02:38:48 +0000 UTC]

First thought when I saw this: Dolphins.

Just the feeling of shapes moving streamlined through the water.
Beautiful piece. I love the colours.
Great job.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Senecal In reply to SleepingTrinity [2006-10-05 04:33:13 +0000 UTC]

I can see that. I fact, it is about porpoises.

Okay I am kidding. I just wanted to see if I could spell that word.
I am not sure that I succeeded.

I miss Mr. T.
When he departs this Earthly plane...who is there to replace him?
This is, in part what keeps me awake and causes me to use the time to make work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SleepingTrinity In reply to Senecal [2006-10-07 02:46:24 +0000 UTC]

Aw, I got all excited for a second.

Well, congrats!
Dictionary.com says that you spelled it perfectly.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Senecal In reply to SleepingTrinity [2006-10-10 05:19:42 +0000 UTC]

Dictionary.com eh? Ah yes I remember it well.
Then it took out that damn restraining order.

"...ely" or just "ly" these adverbial clauses are to blame I tell you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SleepingTrinity In reply to Senecal [2006-10-11 01:25:10 +0000 UTC]

Silent letters can make a man do crazy things...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

leafface [2006-10-02 22:35:07 +0000 UTC]

yea this one is sure small. (still brilliant of course)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Senecal In reply to leafface [2006-10-05 04:31:50 +0000 UTC]

Ah, thank you. I especially enjoy your "effusive sparkel output".
I am glad to hear your thoughts on these works, and happy you checked them out.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

automatica [2006-10-02 19:44:31 +0000 UTC]

so youre saying youve come up with an idea where these are shown on a digital screen/frame contraption..? its a great idea, and way to push the boundaries of art.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Senecal In reply to automatica [2006-10-05 04:40:18 +0000 UTC]

That sucked. I had a pretty lengthly reply going and something tanked out.
Short version, yes, though there are others who have made moves in this direction.
Since at least 1998 I have been waiting for the technology to become available.

It is good because it retains the imagery in its native environment, but the downside is the size limitation of the display devices.
But you have to work with what you have for the time being!

Thanks very much for checking it out and stopping by!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

automatica In reply to Senecal [2006-10-05 05:39:34 +0000 UTC]

i just noticed i said the world digital 6 times.

...digital.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Senecal In reply to automatica [2006-10-10 05:21:32 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I tend to jabber on a bit.
Mostly because at the time of writing, I am thinking about what I wanted to say.

Planning is for...the prepared or something.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

automatica In reply to Senecal [2006-10-05 05:38:20 +0000 UTC]

i like the feeling it implies, like hey, this is digital art and its going to stay digital. why should my piece of art created digitally be forced to be put in the standards of print and the world of traditional art? its digital for the sake of being digital and i love that.

but youve also just pointed out another fun little quirk of the digital world, it can tank out.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

wroth [2006-10-02 17:11:32 +0000 UTC]

The shifting zones of sharpness are very interesting, somewhat similar to depth of field stacking in a photo but clearly very different also. The line work, on Difference or masked or however, in the lower right also is interesting.

You could put your work anywhere, from a napkin to a 50’ plasma, and it would look good. Interesting to see such a deliberate choice though. Would be good to see scrap photos of this contraption in action’

To hell with hardcopies, I say. I think I’ve only printed a handful of my photos, into a photo book for my grandfather’s birthday and also some test 8x5 postcards, otherwise I’m unpublished. Partly I don’t want to deal with the hassle of learning to print or finding some place trustworthy to print for me, partly because I don’t show at galleries so don’t need prints, but also partly because I don’t like the idea of un-digitizing my work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Senecal In reply to wroth [2006-10-05 04:42:30 +0000 UTC]

Thanks man. I think you are allied with the purity of reason.. making the work for yourself, because you have to, for the noble reason mark-making developed and has been sustained over countless generations of humanity.

There is honor in that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

cogwurx [2006-10-02 16:28:43 +0000 UTC]

Brilliant!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Senecal In reply to cogwurx [2006-10-10 05:29:18 +0000 UTC]

Thanks man!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bibble [2006-10-02 16:15:03 +0000 UTC]

mmmm

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Senecal In reply to bibble [2006-10-05 04:42:55 +0000 UTC]

better than zzzz!

As always, good to see ya!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

horusrogue [2006-10-02 05:56:52 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful conglomerate of colors and sharpness.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Senecal In reply to horusrogue [2006-10-10 05:29:49 +0000 UTC]

Hey thanks. I have solid respect for your work. Glad you stopped by to check this out.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Aegis-Illustration [2006-10-02 02:50:30 +0000 UTC]

I like its freedom feeling, with no strings attached.

I get stuck sometimes too with the issue of prints sizes, but well...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Senecal In reply to Aegis-Illustration [2006-10-10 05:33:50 +0000 UTC]

Hey thanks. Glad you stopped in to see it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0