Comments: 17
cuda0820 [2018-08-09 22:15:51 +0000 UTC]
My Father was a Mechanic/Flight Engineer on this plane in WWII. I have some pictures of the plane and him working on it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to cuda0820 [2018-09-02 14:45:16 +0000 UTC]
What Squadron was he with?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tyhopho [2005-03-29 22:13:39 +0000 UTC]
your fanastically detailed style as usual - i will say though what happened around the windows of the liberator? they seem a bit flat and lifeless
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to tyhopho [2005-03-30 10:41:48 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Brian! This is still a work in progress, the reference I had on this was so bad, I've changed the face on the pin-up and the bubble glass twice trying to get them to look right. I found some decent reference on the bubble windows, so they will be getting a redo. It's fortunate most Liberator photos were shot at almost the same angle, it was just a matter of finding the same aircraft model ( they built over 18,000 models a-m ) with the same window configurations, so watch for the update later this week.
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zeitdrache [2005-03-29 01:10:16 +0000 UTC]
Wow... so do you use photos for reference? and how on gods green earth do you always get your planes so realistic looking in vector art?! i need to start drawing some bombers lol.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to zeitdrache [2005-04-02 22:59:23 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! Yes, I use photo reference, but I rarely stick strictly to it. If I'm not satisfied with what I see in the photo, I change it. I try to include all the details, all the rivets, the stencils, dents and scratches, If I can't find the details in the photo I'm working from, try to find them in other photos. The B-24 may be one of the most photographed planes ever, so there is a lot of reference. The reference I had for this plane was pretty bad, it was a low rez jpeg from Ebay, not much to work from, but I made the best of it.
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ScislaC [2005-03-28 19:23:10 +0000 UTC]
too awesome! I really like how the painted words actually look painted... (vs just slapping 'real' text on there)
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
yankeedog In reply to ScislaC [2005-04-02 23:11:11 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! Sometimes it's the little details, a highlight here, a shadow there, a scratch, a dent, a stain that make the difference between a good illustration and a better illustration. -YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
yankeedog In reply to ScislaC [2005-04-02 23:11:00 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! Sometimes it's the little details, a highlight here, a shadow there, a scratch, a dent, a stain that make the difference between a good illustration and a better illustration. -YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mls [2005-03-28 15:08:59 +0000 UTC]
Excellent attention to detail, as always!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to mls [2005-04-02 23:16:42 +0000 UTC]
Thanks man!
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
yankeedog In reply to jojomercury [2005-03-28 10:27:22 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Jojo! They used B-24D models on the Ploesti, an early version of the B-24 that didn't have a gun turret in the nose. The B-25 was used on the first Tokyo Mission that was flown by Jimmy Doolittle.
Here's an illustration I did of one of the heroes of the Ploesti Raid: [link]
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ahmednayyer [2005-03-27 19:04:07 +0000 UTC]
Very detailed, I feel the rivets are of the correct number, but these look a little extra, again nice job.
Sometimes I wonder where you get this information?
Ahmed Nayyer
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to ahmednayyer [2005-03-27 19:43:27 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Ahmed! There are a lot of rivits on a B-24, I made them a little larger than they really are. I was on one a few years ago and they are covered with rivets, B-17 have a tone of rivets too. Here's the one I was on: [link]
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0