HOME | DD

xAgNO3x β€” Adrian Xhixo

Published: 2008-09-27 05:29:09 +0000 UTC; Views: 921; Favourites: 21; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Another shot. His right eye looks like David Bowie
Related content
Comments: 22

SpAmSaLoT [2010-02-27 16:29:12 +0000 UTC]

Wow,this image just blows me away! So well defined! & a little bit scary,too

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xAgNO3x In reply to SpAmSaLoT [2010-02-28 20:04:22 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, this was my first picture with tons of details all around A technique that I'm still developing, but started in year 2005.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Fritzchen-26 [2009-06-18 03:56:44 +0000 UTC]

If ever there were a photo capturing pure emotion, this is the one. An amazing shot.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xAgNO3x In reply to Fritzchen-26 [2009-06-18 23:29:55 +0000 UTC]

Well, thank you By the way, I'm looking for the other photo, the one with the fan over the window... Looking into some DVD's... Cannot find it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

zoomzoom [2009-01-20 05:18:48 +0000 UTC]

so... what's the post production on this image? what did u do in photoshop?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ivana7688 [2008-12-17 10:00:23 +0000 UTC]

posta q parece el ojo de Bowie..
es alucinante esta foto chabΓ³n!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xAgNO3x In reply to ivana7688 [2008-12-25 14:43:37 +0000 UTC]

Gracias, Ivana... El ojo de Bowie se podrΓ­a llamar la foto Jaja

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

zoomzoom [2008-10-17 05:36:02 +0000 UTC]

what camera did u shot this one with?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xAgNO3x In reply to zoomzoom [2008-10-18 04:45:37 +0000 UTC]

Hello brotha'! Canon 400D/XTi

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zoomzoom In reply to xAgNO3x [2008-10-18 17:25:32 +0000 UTC]

i am thinking of getting Canon 450D/XSi... what do u think?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xAgNO3x In reply to zoomzoom [2008-10-19 02:40:08 +0000 UTC]

Mmmhhhh... Well... You should think in a Canon 1000D, which have been released just 2 months later than the Canon XSi. The Canon XSi has more mp, but the 1000D has more quality and, as always, quality allows a better image re-scaling if desired.
The Canon's XXXD have a type of sensor which is called APS-C, which means that it's smaller than a 35mm film or full frame sensor. The APS-C cannot afford more than 10.1 mp because surpassing that limit will generate more noise and more blurry images due the overwhelming pixel condensation in such small sensor. The Canon XSi has surpassed that limit and they've added a low pΓ ss filter before its sensor in order to lower the noise generated by such amount of mp. I don't know how good it is, but reviews says that the Canon 1000D should have been the new XSi and not the 450D.

Just think that the 1000D was released 2 months later than the 450D, I guess the XSi was more like a prototype than a final product.
If you like and want, you can buy a Nikon D700, which is a dream, the perfect camera which will allow you to take pictures in whatever light conditions with a superb quality, but it's more expensive.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zoomzoom In reply to xAgNO3x [2008-10-19 07:35:14 +0000 UTC]

hmm. to my knowledge 1000D or Rebel XS is lower and cheaper model then xsi. see this info right here
[link]
and for $70 more I rather get little better camera..

Nikon D700 maybe great, but i just don't want to spend that much money... its just a hobby..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xAgNO3x In reply to zoomzoom [2008-10-19 19:17:18 +0000 UTC]

I see... I just saw the 1000D many months ago, but not a comparisson and not a full review... What wonders me is the sensor size... Why the 1000D has an smaller sensor size... That's not right.
Well... go ahead for the XSi then

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

snowflakedancer [2008-09-27 06:03:12 +0000 UTC]

FREAKY lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xAgNO3x In reply to snowflakedancer [2008-09-27 13:47:36 +0000 UTC]

JJAja yeah... Mental diseases are cool (if not in our brain)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

snowflakedancer In reply to xAgNO3x [2008-09-27 14:10:14 +0000 UTC]

jajajaj, i too agree! lololol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sintrix85 [2008-09-27 05:30:20 +0000 UTC]

this picture is insane! wow

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xAgNO3x In reply to Sintrix85 [2008-09-27 05:40:23 +0000 UTC]

JAjjA Thanks, also the develop spent time

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Sintrix85 In reply to xAgNO3x [2008-09-27 05:46:20 +0000 UTC]

how did you get so much definition in the picture? you can see every pore in his skin. How?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xAgNO3x In reply to Sintrix85 [2008-09-27 06:03:39 +0000 UTC]

Well... Spending in a good lense!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Sintrix85 In reply to xAgNO3x [2008-09-27 17:09:54 +0000 UTC]

what lens?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xAgNO3x In reply to Sintrix85 [2008-09-27 19:03:20 +0000 UTC]

A good one. I have a Nikor 50mm f/1.4 D for FX format (my only lens ^^, they're quite expensive). You should think in lenses without zoom (don't know how to spell it in English, sorry). If Canon, some AF L or Red Ring will help.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0