Comments: 163
afreespirit In reply to ??? [2008-12-19 17:24:44 +0000 UTC]
No wonder your shots are consistently the most popular among dA. Your equipment is absolutely magnificent!
I hope one day to have a Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 L IS USM. How I would adore having IS! As of right now, my pride and joy is a Tamron 200-400mm f5.6.
I notice that you use battery grips on all your bodies - do you find they are much better than regular batteries? How much longer is the charge held in something like that?
Your feedback is appreciated, considering all the comments you must get on a regular basis. I'm looking forward to more of your fabulous shots!
π: 0 β©: 1
A-WhiteWolf-in-Black In reply to ??? [2008-10-05 13:46:37 +0000 UTC]
look at all that beautiful equipment *drools*
π: 0 β©: 0
t-o-j-e-e-m In reply to ??? [2008-09-20 08:19:21 +0000 UTC]
oh my god that's a lot of gear.... i wish i could afford cameras like that!
how are the Canon cameras? I've never used canon, i prefer Pentax and Nikon, but I'm thinking i might get a canon sometime, I've heard they're better. i personally think Canon's over-hyped, but then again I've never used one before.
π: 0 β©: 2
Danferno In reply to t-o-j-e-e-m [2008-12-14 10:23:13 +0000 UTC]
Canon has by far the best sensor and noise-reduction system. It comes at a price though. If you can live with (hardly noticeably) lower quality, Olympus, Pentax and Nikon (in order of cheapness) are just as good.
π: 0 β©: 0
C-Zavala In reply to SOOPER [2009-01-26 09:46:52 +0000 UTC]
first let me say how much I hate you!!! jk, just jealous. I shoot canon but as far as professionals and low light are concerned with sports sadly Nikon is making a huge leap with the new D3. if only i had money to invest in new gear.
π: 0 β©: 0
zombielocky [2008-09-07 03:43:40 +0000 UTC]
holy hell dude, you are ready to kick some ass at any focal length XD
ohh to have a Canon EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM how good is it across the focal range?
π: 0 β©: 1
SOOPER In reply to zombielocky [2008-09-08 16:02:36 +0000 UTC]
It's as good as any long zoom lens when it's sunny out, but kind of slow when shooting in cloudy situation. Overall it's a versatile lens to have when going from one type of shot to another--since there's no need to change from a short to long zoom lens.
π: 0 β©: 1
TheMorfer In reply to ??? [2008-08-26 14:44:48 +0000 UTC]
Wow -seeing your stuff is just telling me that I'm a long way off from being a professional photographer.
π: 0 β©: 1
TheMorfer In reply to SOOPER [2008-09-02 14:18:47 +0000 UTC]
Thank you Sooper ^_^
π: 0 β©: 0
phantom105 [2008-08-20 19:15:49 +0000 UTC]
Holy crap man, u got quite the set-up there. That stuff must have cost a fortune too
π: 0 β©: 0
loveforRuka [2008-07-05 03:03:05 +0000 UTC]
The 28-300mm is much love. The people at the camera store kept trying to talk me out of it, but I knew better. I've been so pleased with the results I'm glad to see you have it.
π: 0 β©: 1
loveforRuka In reply to Sooper-Deviant [2008-07-07 20:27:16 +0000 UTC]
ol the same body I have. I have to admit it does very well in the day. But I've taken some night show shots with it at SeaWorld, and was very impressed. I'm sure with practice I'll do better with it. Though I haven't really used it outside zoo and marine park environments.
π: 0 β©: 0
nikiq [2008-07-03 03:22:14 +0000 UTC]
So I am looking into getting a new digital camera.. and you are basically my fave photographer on DeviantArt. So I was wondering, what digital camera would you recommend? I want to get something that is somewhere between the regular Canon PowerShot cameras and the uber-pro level of cameras. Leaning more towards the PowerShot though as far as price range goes... Do you have any recommendations??
Sorry if this is a bother >.<
π: 0 β©: 1
Sooper-Deviant In reply to nikiq [2008-07-07 18:59:35 +0000 UTC]
If you are leaning towards the all-in-one camera, the Canon PowerShot S5 IS may be a good choice within the budget. This compact sized camera has a Super Macro feature, good zoom capability and allows you to take video clips. You may need a lightweight monopod and perhaps an external flash unit to go with this when shooting in low-light environment. It uses AA batteries, so an additional set of rechargeables are highly suggested.
If you are ready for the digital SLR world, the Canon Digital Rebel XT or XTi are good picks for starters. They are fairly economical and come with great sensors. Both camera bodies come with optional kit lenses, but I'd suggest getting more specialized lenses if you have some extra cash to spend. The EF 28-135mm IS may be a good lens to have since it covers a good range of zoom and includes macro feature as well.
π: 0 β©: 1
Triplechance [2008-06-25 20:26:41 +0000 UTC]
Haha x] I just got a Nikon and a 18-55mm lens. And yes, phoyoshop elements 6.0 too XD
π: 0 β©: 0
GeaAusten [2008-04-20 17:16:09 +0000 UTC]
VERY INTERESTED in your opinion, I came home with some photos today as usual, the bird ones were quite dull, the hedges and beach ok.. then happened across your gull, which was such a fantastic shot I looked at your equipment and saw for that one you'd used the Canon EOS 1D Mark III
I have the eos 400D , ANYWAY looked up the price and its 4and a half thousand pounds, was going to get a 450 D next but quite frankly am so impressed with your shot I feel like remortgaging my house to get the same camera , what do you think ? honestly , please
thankyou
Gea
π: 0 β©: 1
Sooper-Deviant In reply to GeaAusten [2008-04-21 18:48:18 +0000 UTC]
I know it costs a little more than your average SLR body, but this isn't an ordinary camera. So for the love of art... do it!
Honestly, it's the best digital SLR camera I've ever used. Having the option to shoot up to ten full frames per second is priceless, specially when capturing sequenced action shots. When paired with the right L-series lens it could simply be the ultimate system for an unique wildlife experience. You can get images so sharp and detailed you would not believe your own eyes!
At the moment, I'm happy with my shots and the result this Mark III has provided. It has yet to fail even shooting under extreme weather conditions... such as in hot and dusty deserts or in cold snowy mountains. Later this year I'll be adding a new 400mm L IS lens to this body for wildlife and sports.
π: 0 β©: 1
GeaAusten In reply to Sooper-Deviant [2008-04-25 09:41:43 +0000 UTC]
gosh.. you nearly sold it to me !!!! THANKYOU very much for the help xxxx
π: 0 β©: 0
ManuCore In reply to ??? [2008-04-16 23:41:47 +0000 UTC]
wow! you sell anything?
π: 0 β©: 0
AEloiseM [2008-03-24 10:04:47 +0000 UTC]
*drools over some of your equipment* lol
π: 0 β©: 0
alenax In reply to ??? [2008-03-15 21:20:04 +0000 UTC]
I'm jealous!
π: 0 β©: 0
MJWRIGHT In reply to ??? [2008-03-08 00:54:10 +0000 UTC]
envy production
π: 0 β©: 0
FantasticFennec [2008-03-05 10:27:27 +0000 UTC]
Put my PowerShot A610 to shame why don't you? .... Ok, so that's not that hard. But seriously, wow, that's a lot of stuff. So do you lug this stuff around with you all the time, or only when you know youβre going somewhere where you can take good photos?
π: 0 β©: 1
Sooper-Deviant In reply to FantasticFennec [2008-03-07 04:56:25 +0000 UTC]
No shame in using a smaller or older camera. In fact, I used my first digital 2.1MP (an 8-year old camera) for this shot.
Have one specialty lens in each group for macro, wide, long zoom, portrait, etc. It's more to carry, but definitely convenient having more than one SLR body so I don't have to switch lenses during my shoots. I only take what I need to get the job done so sometimes one lens is good enough.
π: 0 β©: 0
WiltingSoul [2008-02-20 17:16:08 +0000 UTC]
oooh, I want....
π: 0 β©: 1
Brttnybr08 [2008-02-19 21:41:23 +0000 UTC]
O.O
I feel like fainting. I looked at the price of one camera and that was enough to blow me away.
All I have is a stupid frigging Kodak (Homeowners) Camera, its absolutely terrible. Please don't make me name what kind, its pretty pathetic. I would love to be a photographer, but wow, I need to get a real camera, along with a tripod, lenses, etc.
I hate not having money. *Mutters and sneaks off*
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>