HOME | DD

Elizamac — Frances

Published: 2011-05-22 23:49:12 +0000 UTC; Views: 549; Favourites: 23; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Mona Lisa had the day off...
Frances. Circa 1991.

Nikon FM3. Ilford HP5

Scanned from negative.
Several million dust spots removed in PS Elements.
Related content
Comments: 25

EricForFriends [2011-05-27 06:44:11 +0000 UTC]

A good one, Liz! A lot of the portrait shooters here could learn a thing or two from this. So, you took care of the dust but how did you deal with the 230 Japanese with silly hats who are supposed to stand in front of it?

I always have to struggle to find something pretty about the original Mona Lisa. Maybe it just is Leonardo in drag.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elizamac In reply to EricForFriends [2011-05-27 10:18:54 +0000 UTC]

This was shot in my hubby's old painting studio, he was sharing with a photographer at the time, which was nice I used to borrow the studio at least once a week, sometimes I got to borrow a medium format camera along with the lights and backdrop (i.e. ratty piece of fabric tacked to the wall ) Now I borrow a much fancier portable studio set up about once a month, I hate it! A few Japanese tourists wearing silly hats would add so much to a series of deadly-dull portraits

I had a wonderful lecturer in 20th Century Irish Literature, he also worked as a tour guide during the summer in Joyce's martello tower. One lecture turned into a story-telling session about visitors to Buck Mulligan's tower, the favorite with the class was "the photographic rituals of Japanese tourists." We made him tell it again during our last lecture, and even provided newspapers so that he could act out part of the rituals. The newspapers were to protect bottoms from cold stone seats, perhaps the silly hats detract from the disappointment most seem to suffer when they see the Mona Lisa for the first time?

Leonardo in drag.... Next thing you'll be saying is "The Da Vinci Code" is a literary classic

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EricForFriends In reply to Elizamac [2011-05-27 13:01:41 +0000 UTC]

Leonardo was ... er... male, but not too fanatic about it, maybe that helped. In which case (him also being an Italian), he might actually have been trying to portray his mother. But there we enter in the reign of speculation.


The Da Vinci Code has the hidden metanarrative that it is actually a novel about a writer who's trying to write the Great European Novel, but gets subconsciously driven to write a hideous cashcow because of his unanswered love for his cubist Arts teacher and
It gets hallucinatingly clear if you multiply every letter of it with 62.3348, square the result with the sinus of the leylines between Glastonbury, Slough and the Eiffel Tower, and finally subtract the Pantone numbers of Lady Gaga's hair on any given day.
After all, it's not called a Code for nothing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elizamac In reply to EricForFriends [2011-05-28 18:30:56 +0000 UTC]

You're good at this

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EricForFriends In reply to Elizamac [2011-05-30 20:44:48 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djailledie [2011-05-25 05:09:14 +0000 UTC]

Yes, Da Vinci had also some issues with dust sticking on the fresh paint.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elizamac In reply to djailledie [2011-05-26 12:59:22 +0000 UTC]

Poor man. I believe he invented a vacuum cleaner, but he couldn't find anywhere to plug it in The dust was so bad on the original Mona Lisa, it looked like she had five o'clock shadow.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to Elizamac [2011-06-06 04:46:45 +0000 UTC]

You know that the gender of Mona Lisa has been questioned many times, so it could be something else than dust.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JACAC [2011-05-24 19:35:24 +0000 UTC]

w e l l . d o n e

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elizamac In reply to JACAC [2011-05-26 12:56:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks José

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to Elizamac [2011-05-26 13:44:01 +0000 UTC]

w e . a l r e a d y . k n o w . t h a t . i . l i k e . t h i s . p h o t o

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

retro2k [2011-05-24 12:47:32 +0000 UTC]

Love the nostalgic film, gives a good mood!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elizamac In reply to retro2k [2011-05-26 12:56:43 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Frank

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CrinaPrida [2011-05-23 10:20:58 +0000 UTC]

i like it very much.
Why did you remove the dust - many times, imperfection adds to the beauty of a photo - old or new...

in any case, lovely portrait, Liz!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elizamac In reply to CrinaPrida [2011-05-23 11:38:11 +0000 UTC]

Most of the dust spots were concentrated in two areas of the negative, there was a large patch on the right, just above her head. Ugly, distracting and very annoying! I scanned about 20 negatives from this session, I don't understand why this one was the muckiest

I'm really happy you like it. Thanks Crina!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BobRock99 [2011-05-23 09:16:53 +0000 UTC]

classic! love the contrast too ..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elizamac In reply to BobRock99 [2011-05-23 11:56:21 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

StamatisGR [2011-05-23 05:36:00 +0000 UTC]

a portrait to fall in love with

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elizamac In reply to StamatisGR [2011-05-23 12:28:51 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EintoeRn [2011-05-23 03:14:16 +0000 UTC]

Hanan is right (as always), though Frances has it more with the eyes, then with the smile

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elizamac In reply to EintoeRn [2011-05-23 12:44:38 +0000 UTC]

It took several cans of before smiles appeared

Thanks Ulrich

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EintoeRn In reply to Elizamac [2011-06-01 18:29:53 +0000 UTC]

Well, what an expensive shooting this was

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

partiallyHere [2011-05-23 01:22:54 +0000 UTC]

a real classic !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elizamac In reply to partiallyHere [2011-05-23 11:15:30 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Hanan

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

partiallyHere In reply to Elizamac [2011-05-23 11:54:13 +0000 UTC]

and i said it before i think, on another portrait, lovely model!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0