HOME | DD

xxbcxx — Pretentious Title

Published: 2007-12-26 17:04:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 1393; Favourites: 6; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Most of you know how apathetic I'm feeling towards dA right now... Anyway, here's a little game for you all to play [All in good fun!]

This is a piss-take image done in the style of which uber popular deviant?

The answer is so easy! The first to reply correctly will get a cookie. Or three.

GO!
Related content
Comments: 155

xxbcxx In reply to ??? [2008-02-11 20:29:32 +0000 UTC]

It's harmess fun making and it does clearly state that

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Martieuk In reply to xxbcxx [2008-02-11 22:37:05 +0000 UTC]

oh wells,

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Yellow0013 [2008-01-25 21:17:31 +0000 UTC]

heheheheheheheh ........nice...i like it alot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to Yellow0013 [2008-01-25 21:33:00 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

homedoggieo [2008-01-09 17:42:35 +0000 UTC]

Oh man that's great

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to homedoggieo [2008-01-09 18:23:01 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

homedoggieo In reply to xxbcxx [2008-01-10 05:53:33 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sharpeshots [2008-01-09 00:24:46 +0000 UTC]

lolz

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to Sharpeshots [2008-01-09 10:22:19 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

well-moistened [2008-01-06 22:19:23 +0000 UTC]

LOL LARAFAIRIE. I got shitted on by one of her rabid fanboys today when I commented on her ridiculuously overfaved news article about what she thinks everyone wants in a camera. I was like "This is overdone, do we need more opinions passing as the official camera creed" and he was like "OMG LEAVE LARAFAIRIE ALONE! "

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to well-moistened [2008-01-06 22:34:57 +0000 UTC]

It's funny though, she goes around preaching bollocks about cameras, and uses her tree-fiddy-dee on program mode.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

well-moistened In reply to xxbcxx [2008-01-06 22:36:13 +0000 UTC]

D: i NEVER take mine out of manual mode unless i'm taking gratuitous crotch shots to send nathan!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to well-moistened [2008-01-07 01:27:37 +0000 UTC]

cc me in please.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

well-moistened In reply to xxbcxx [2008-01-07 01:29:06 +0000 UTC]

bcc only someone seems to think he beats me when he catches me flirting

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to well-moistened [2008-01-07 01:35:09 +0000 UTC]

Even when they know I'm just your fag hag?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

well-moistened In reply to xxbcxx [2008-01-07 01:41:05 +0000 UTC]

the fag hag who wants to see gratuitous crotch shots

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to well-moistened [2008-01-07 01:41:50 +0000 UTC]

I'm selling them onto a gay porno site, i swear!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

well-moistened In reply to xxbcxx [2008-01-07 01:45:15 +0000 UTC]

imma get ganked then!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to well-moistened [2008-01-07 20:58:30 +0000 UTC]

YOU LOVE IT!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dystopiates [2008-01-05 23:58:22 +0000 UTC]

I fucking lol'd.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to Dystopiates [2008-01-06 21:56:20 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dystopiates In reply to xxbcxx [2008-01-07 01:40:02 +0000 UTC]

And you still look hot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to Dystopiates [2008-01-07 01:42:02 +0000 UTC]

D'awww

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

marijangluhak [2008-01-04 22:50:15 +0000 UTC]

we cannot steal you... therefore i'd like to steal you! is that possible?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to marijangluhak [2008-01-04 23:50:17 +0000 UTC]

You'd have to ask `dxd if you can borrow me for a while

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marijangluhak In reply to xxbcxx [2008-01-05 00:20:00 +0000 UTC]

i called... nobody answered!
i knocked... nobody open!

then it means he agrees!
now, i'd like to take you away!
may i??

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to marijangluhak [2008-01-05 12:51:24 +0000 UTC]

Only if it's somewhere nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marijangluhak In reply to xxbcxx [2008-01-05 12:55:10 +0000 UTC]

cruise around the universe!
what d'ya say?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to marijangluhak [2008-01-05 14:12:30 +0000 UTC]

Sounds good... But You'll need to convince me some more

I'm not that easy!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marijangluhak In reply to xxbcxx [2008-01-05 14:31:59 +0000 UTC]

you know, there's the star on the sky called by your name! i can take you there...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to marijangluhak [2008-01-05 14:39:33 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marijangluhak In reply to xxbcxx [2008-01-05 14:50:59 +0000 UTC]

hehehe! i suppose it means no! hehe!
do you know, human soul can fly?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to marijangluhak [2008-01-05 18:41:30 +0000 UTC]

That's if you believe in a human soul

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marijangluhak In reply to xxbcxx [2008-01-05 18:45:47 +0000 UTC]

if you don't... what else do you got? what's the rest?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to marijangluhak [2008-01-05 19:01:05 +0000 UTC]

Body

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marijangluhak In reply to xxbcxx [2008-01-05 19:06:19 +0000 UTC]

it's so weak... it's just a complex machine! but it might stop to exist in a second! is it all???

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to marijangluhak [2008-01-06 22:02:24 +0000 UTC]

If it's physical, then it exists. You cant hold a soul, you cant feel it, see it or even smell it. From that standpoint [a scientific one] the soul doesnt technically exist. And there's yet to be anything to prove it either

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marijangluhak In reply to xxbcxx [2008-01-06 22:50:53 +0000 UTC]

if it's not possible to prove that soul exists, it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist! of course it cannot be detected by any sense... because senses detect matter! it's not possible to prove that abstract ideas of table, dog, love, sky, of eager... technically exist. but it's not possible to deny them either. but... it is possible to be reasonable suspicious about existence of body or any matter... because after senses detect it, they send electric impulses to our brain, which makes idea from those impulses. therefore, we have only idea of "real", material world! we cannot prove it actually, technically exists! we can only prove that we have idea of it! idea of human being is almost what we consider as soul!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to marijangluhak [2008-01-07 01:27:23 +0000 UTC]

And what would you class a "soul" as? Some kind of devine entity? I'm curious to know your definition of this word

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marijangluhak In reply to xxbcxx [2008-01-07 21:26:18 +0000 UTC]

i don't think that is possible to define soul! there are many definitions, but there are many differences between them. Soul is something beyond human knowledge!
I consider: soul + body = human being. therefore: human being - body = soul!
we can only recognize influence of the soul into the material world!
for example... human leaded by some ideas can act against his laws of existence!
that's probably some kind of human entity which has bee given to humans to be driven by free will.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BloodyMadeleine [2008-01-04 00:34:24 +0000 UTC]

HAHAHAHA! You're on crack! How cool this is!
I can't make it with my eyes u___u xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to BloodyMadeleine [2008-01-04 23:52:26 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

daleala [2008-01-03 14:03:36 +0000 UTC]

lolwut?!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to daleala [2008-01-03 19:21:18 +0000 UTC]

:B

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

daleala In reply to xxbcxx [2008-01-04 11:55:07 +0000 UTC]

!?tuwlol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xxindescribablexx [2008-01-03 02:14:21 +0000 UTC]

This is why I like to watch you. You don't take things so seriously, you appreciate and acknowledge the fact that people do admire you as an artist, and you're just hella funny.

But I guess people don't see it like I do. If someone were to do something like this to my work as a joke I would think it was pretty funny. But yea, I liked this and it made me laugh.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xxbcxx In reply to xxindescribablexx [2008-01-03 19:48:05 +0000 UTC]

Youm my dear, are made of awesomeness and WINWINWIN!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LaMeep [2007-12-31 03:09:38 +0000 UTC]

Are you sure this isn't a little mean-spirited?
I mean, if it were poking fun if it were focused at the millions of deviations like this on dA everywhere, but...
Whatever. Just me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

xxbcxx In reply to LaMeep [2007-12-31 17:47:52 +0000 UTC]

The deviation description clearly states that it is all in good fun.

If people are too far up their own asses and cant pull their heads out long enough to realize that, then it really isnt my problem

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LaMeep In reply to xxbcxx [2008-01-01 01:31:29 +0000 UTC]

You can't just slap an "all in good fun" label on something rude and make it okay. :/ I honestly can't see how anyone wouldn't be at least a little put off by this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>