HOME | DD

WRDBNR — Love is Lust

Published: 2010-03-18 22:56:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 11171; Favourites: 276; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description This piece represents the theory that lust is a part of love. Lust creeps around it and disguises itself as love. The shadows are also symbolical; lust is often casting shadows on love, and love sometimes lives in the shadows of lust.

It's not easy to read and it's not supposed to be. I wanted the viewer to go deeper, appreciate the details more, and discover the double meaning of the piece without any hints.


Get this on a tee at this [link] or makeyourownwordboner.com. You can also get it in European store at this [link] .
More daily wordboners at wordboner.com, where else?
Related content
Comments: 40

MariaGuerrero99 [2024-08-27 04:19:36 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MariaGuerrero99 [2024-08-27 04:18:44 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nihil-Ego [2017-06-24 19:00:35 +0000 UTC]

In reverse that most peoples thinks, lust is not actually only about sex. It's actually the immaterial counterpart to greed:

While greed is the uncontrolled, corrupted desire for material things, lust is the uncontrolled, corrupted desire for more "conceptual" thing.

We can be lustful for sexual pleasure, obviously, but also other kinds of pleasures, power, popularity, knowledge, and even love.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FireNationPhoenix [2015-07-26 03:25:25 +0000 UTC]

Lust is lust, but it can be very sly and hidden, and it can fool the masses BIG time into its agenda. My dear friend is in a dangerous relationship she dubs love, but the boy she is with is not in love, he's in lust with her. When in a relationship, know the difference so you don't regret it later.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TuDoRlUcIa [2012-08-21 12:40:35 +0000 UTC]

i see lost between love and lust

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Loreen94 [2011-06-16 02:39:57 +0000 UTC]

When I look at this, Not only do I see the words love and lust, but I also see the word lost. Probably just me though.
Love the meaning anyway.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StrixCZ In reply to Loreen94 [2011-06-16 20:23:00 +0000 UTC]

Lost between love and lust...?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

evd-design [2010-12-14 15:58:03 +0000 UTC]

You've made a great combination of these two words! It's still readable. It's great that you've putted the first two letters of the first word to the front and the last two of the second word. It makes a great combination and contrast.
Really like this one!

from Belgium

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WRDBNR In reply to evd-design [2011-01-17 16:36:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xToushirou-Kurosakix [2010-09-24 16:32:49 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful What more can I say?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WRDBNR In reply to xToushirou-Kurosakix [2010-09-30 10:14:03 +0000 UTC]

Haha thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Halfingr [2010-09-07 17:43:00 +0000 UTC]

Really nice execution - I like the symbolism of the shadows and how lust casts shadow over love, but not love over lust.

But I don't agree with it in whole. More of a one way equation.

Example: I love my mother. I don't lust after her.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WRDBNR In reply to Halfingr [2010-09-09 11:19:44 +0000 UTC]

Obviously, the love in between family members is not the topic of this piece.
Thanks for your input

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ivana-martin [2010-07-09 03:40:19 +0000 UTC]

My current wallpaper,
I totally agree with this piece.
It's always Lust @ 1st sight..

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

WRDBNR In reply to ivana-martin [2010-07-15 16:41:27 +0000 UTC]

It's very interesting - people usually see what they want to see there. Maybe what's more important to them, I don't know.
For me, I see Lust too, everytime.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ivana-martin In reply to ivana-martin [2010-07-09 03:41:38 +0000 UTC]

Is that why Lust is more noticeable than Love?

Because it's Lust @ 1st sight?

I think I just saw the piece in a whole different way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

purpleguitarfreak [2010-04-05 23:10:38 +0000 UTC]

clever

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thesashabell [2010-03-29 15:02:45 +0000 UTC]

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that this has been featured in this news article:- Typography Love I hope you don't mind, I just love this image so much I couldn't not add it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SER1 [2010-03-22 10:58:49 +0000 UTC]

good execution...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WRDBNR In reply to SER1 [2010-03-22 13:08:27 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, I appreciate it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Imadumasslol [2010-03-19 10:04:20 +0000 UTC]

It's sad really. Everybody thinks about sex first and their relationship later. To me there is no such thing as anymore. It died a long time ago. Good job though dude. You make so much since.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WRDBNR In reply to Imadumasslol [2010-03-19 13:15:22 +0000 UTC]

That's one way to look at it.
For me, personally, it was the thought that there cannot be love without lust that started the piece going.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Imadumasslol In reply to WRDBNR [2010-04-03 03:52:34 +0000 UTC]

Which is why I think it's sad. You don't need sex to love each other. Well that's what I thought, but aparrantly not.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WRDBNR In reply to Imadumasslol [2010-04-03 10:52:35 +0000 UTC]

I don't think you can have love that works without lust and I don't think you can have lust without love.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Imadumasslol In reply to WRDBNR [2010-04-05 21:17:21 +0000 UTC]

I believe you can but it's very uncommon. I believe lust is the cause of a lot of relationship problems.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WRDBNR In reply to Imadumasslol [2010-04-05 22:00:35 +0000 UTC]

Not if it's channeled right.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Imadumasslol In reply to WRDBNR [2010-04-16 00:48:42 +0000 UTC]

Oh it's never channeled right.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

akkasone [2010-03-19 04:25:03 +0000 UTC]

I really like the way 'v' and 'e' overlapping 's' and 't' respectively... did u tried such overlapping on 'o' and 'u'?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WRDBNR In reply to akkasone [2010-03-19 13:14:19 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I tried a lot of concepts actually. I tried to angle the cut on U. The problem with u and o was that it really looked like 'lost'. Which also kind of makes sense, but it wasn't the concept this time

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

neversometimesalways [2010-03-19 01:12:49 +0000 UTC]

Another masterpiece

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WRDBNR In reply to neversometimesalways [2010-03-19 13:12:48 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TehAngelsCry [2010-03-19 00:21:30 +0000 UTC]

I really love this. The concept behind it is brilliant, and it's been really well executed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WRDBNR In reply to TehAngelsCry [2010-03-19 13:12:42 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

a2designs [2010-03-18 23:23:32 +0000 UTC]

Actually I find it quite easy to read and as with your work, well executed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WRDBNR In reply to a2designs [2010-03-18 23:24:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

a2designs In reply to WRDBNR [2010-03-18 23:28:19 +0000 UTC]

no problem

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xoja [2010-03-18 23:20:58 +0000 UTC]

Shadows are a brilliant and meaningful touch. Brilliant brilliant brilliant. Deep.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WRDBNR In reply to xoja [2010-03-18 23:21:38 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xoja In reply to WRDBNR [2010-03-18 23:27:14 +0000 UTC]

Incredibly welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cyranosdemet [2010-03-18 22:58:02 +0000 UTC]

good concept... and good luck at getting folks to understand it... really.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0