HOME | DD

AdamsWife [2008-04-15 23:43:29 +0000 UTC]

Beautifully done.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Paw-BR [2008-04-15 23:39:44 +0000 UTC]

Impressive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Blikes [2008-04-03 14:10:18 +0000 UTC]

Cute!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

seigneurbacon [2008-03-27 02:12:53 +0000 UTC]

genial! j'adore les oiseaux^^ d'ailleur ca fait un bail que j'ai pas fait chanter le petit oiseau sur ton sac a dos...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

leprousharry [2008-03-26 13:03:17 +0000 UTC]

Je suis partiellement d'accord avec le problème du champ focal. Le fait que ce soit un plan de vue en macro devrait d'autant plus provoquer un flou en arrière plan. Toutefois, l'image perdrait beaucoup de détails, notamment au niveau de la haie et de l'arbre du fond, et comme il y a déjà un léger effet de flou, je trouve que c'est très bien comme c'est là. Il pourrait simplement s'agir d'un zoom optique puissant, ce qui n'a pas comme effet de changer le champ focal... ou lancez moi des pierres si ma mémoire me fait défaut.

Personnellement, je dirais CHAPEAU!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZheAldo [2008-03-26 12:23:00 +0000 UTC]

W o w

Je suis pas trop un connaisseur en dessin... je suis un journaliste, un photographe, un écrivain, un programmeur... mais pas un dessinateur.

Mais... w o w.

C'est vraiment joliment bien fait. Les perspectives, les proportions, l'oiseau, l'arbre, l'arrière-plan... tout est parfait!

(le seul truc qui dérange mon oeil de photographe en herbe, c'est que l'oiseau est dans le même champ focal que l'arrière-plan. Mais évidement, il n'y a pas de focus, pas de flou, c'est un dessin )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Windblade-chan [2008-03-26 11:01:45 +0000 UTC]

Huuuuui~ *scrolls down to add comment*
*sees totenmaske's comment*
*hides in closet*

.........
That image is just... WOAH. *doesn't anything good to say*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

totenmaske [2008-03-26 04:00:56 +0000 UTC]

Seriously, from all your work that I have seen to date - I must say this is one of the most impressive images. Overall the detail to scene truly outshines what one can expect. The only elements that seemed to be weak (and this is the most nitpicky issues I could have about the overall image) is the the background houses, and the foreground snow on the branch.

Now, the background houses, they lack individuality - I've seen a few 'in process' homes that were gray before they finished off adding the stucco - but this being in the North (with cold weather) you don't really see much stucco, so I am going to believe that you simply want the viewer to concentrate on the foreground and the subject of this image. That's fine, to me the background has that slight blur effect much like a photograph - so it works. The houses though could have had a little individuality but overall this is a moot point.

Now the foreground, the branch is fantastic - little buds look perfect. There is just the most subtle texture to it that it really comes across perfectly. The bird is simply perfect - feet have a slight hint of ridges and even though there is no sharp detail of feathers - the softening and slight color variation to create shadows and a sense of texture adds that wonderful sense of 'fluffy soft bird' perfection. The snow... well the snow in the background is excused, but the snow in the foreground needs texture. Just a slight touch, you don't have to overdue it, but it needs a sense of ice crystals. Personally I think if you play around with the same technique you used on the buds you could easily achieve the sense of fine grains of ice in the snow to give it that extra detail.

That being said, this is simply a superb image and I hope you do win the contest or get more comments on this fantastically crafted piece.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0