Comments: 37
DrPolaris [2019-04-06 16:54:58 +0000 UTC]
What a stork looks like after you’ve done acid!
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
TREX2219 [2019-03-07 21:36:16 +0000 UTC]
Man that is one ugly pterosaur.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DinosRAwesome [2019-03-06 09:34:25 +0000 UTC]
This is an interesting depiction of Hatzegopteryx, but there's an inaccuracy. The fourth wing finger was actually folded more inwards, close to the wrist and going over the elbows(not under), allowing the wing to neatly fold out of the way, instead of slightly splaying out backwards exposing them. This fossil shows how the wings folded pterosaurheresies.files.wordpr…
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Atlantis536 In reply to DinosRAwesome [2019-03-16 00:57:00 +0000 UTC]
Don't listen to that website - the creator, David Peters, is pretty controversial.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DinosRAwesome In reply to Atlantis536 [2019-03-17 06:00:12 +0000 UTC]
I've read many articles on his two websites and there's nothing really controversial there
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Teratophoneus In reply to DinosRAwesome [2019-03-06 10:11:27 +0000 UTC]
thank you, I´ll keep this in mind in future pterosaur reconstructions!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Atlantis536 In reply to Teratophoneus [2019-03-16 00:57:16 +0000 UTC]
Don't listen to that website - the creator, David Peters, is pretty controversial.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
aHungryCarnotaurus [2019-03-05 10:32:51 +0000 UTC]
when the turkeys finally get done with humans Scheisse
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Atlantis536 [2019-03-05 08:47:11 +0000 UTC]
Truly a "murder bird".
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WILDGAMIN [2019-03-04 23:43:39 +0000 UTC]
with a head like that it would never get airborne, but good job it looks great.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Teratophoneus In reply to WILDGAMIN [2019-03-06 00:13:25 +0000 UTC]
dont be fooled by the head, it was actually very light with huge fenestra lightening the overall weight of the skll. In fact the torso,albeit short housed all the organs and a lot of muscle so the centre of gravity would not have been as far to the front as it might seem. Hatzegoperyx is estimated by some to have reached around 200 kg in weight and a lot of it would have been distributed in the torso
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheDinoDrawer66 [2019-03-04 20:38:23 +0000 UTC]
It's looks like the king of the storks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dromaeus [2019-03-04 19:00:56 +0000 UTC]
Epic!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MaybeDie [2019-03-04 18:36:14 +0000 UTC]
Oh my god, this scary creature, but art is very good
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hans-sniekers-art [2019-03-04 18:25:57 +0000 UTC]
Ah that color of the neck makes it look so gnarly and scary .... brrrrrrr great work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Corallianassa [2019-03-04 16:59:57 +0000 UTC]
That's oversized by a factor of 2 linearly (so 8 times too big in volume)
But nice work artistically.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Corallianassa In reply to PrehistoryByLiam [2019-03-05 06:43:58 +0000 UTC]
Yes it would roughly. Your rendition seems overscaled as well, though a bit less. The shoulder of this animal would be ~1.8 m high roughly when I scaled it so it seems.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Teratophoneus In reply to Corallianassa [2019-03-04 23:11:21 +0000 UTC]
not too sure scaling it down by 50 % would mean the animals skull would be only around 1,5 metres in length , however the skull most likely was around 3 metres long (or so I read). I scaled it down slightly, took some new measurements but 50 % would be too much. This reconstruction here for example is almost the same in size
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Corallianassa In reply to Teratophoneus [2019-03-05 06:45:26 +0000 UTC]
Liam's is overscaled as well, try overlaying Mark Witton's skeletal. What doesn't entirely help is that the skull in your rendition is smaller relative to the body and limbs than in other renditions (for example, the torso in your rendition is ~ 2 m long, while in reality it was under 1 m)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Teratophoneus In reply to Corallianassa [2019-03-05 09:04:28 +0000 UTC]
ok , I scaled up the head by a whopping 150 % and downscaled the rest of the animal accordingly, also shortening the torso a bit. I think it should be fine now,I´d be glad if you could take another look
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Corallianassa In reply to Teratophoneus [2019-03-05 13:10:06 +0000 UTC]
Definitely looks closer to Witton's skeletal now. Very nice job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Teratophoneus In reply to Corallianassa [2019-03-06 00:20:30 +0000 UTC]
thanks, its nice to have people like you that point such discrepancies in my drawings, I really am no expert, I consider myself more a dinosaur enthusiast rather than a real expert like many other high quality palaeo artists are. But I still try to maintain a high quality standard in accuracy for my reconstructions and its guys like you that help me with that, so thank you, its very much appreciated!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
malevouvenator [2019-03-04 15:40:54 +0000 UTC]
Man you should colour tout drawings! This one looks sick and brutal! I always imagined arzharquids as giant badass storks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Teratophoneus In reply to malevouvenator [2019-03-04 16:37:29 +0000 UTC]
well my friend you´ll be glad to hear that there will be a lot more coloured drawings, next is the first ever DA depiction of sauroplites!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
John-the-Enforcer [2019-03-04 14:29:44 +0000 UTC]
Certainly looks like it could swallow a human whole...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gytalf2000 [2019-03-04 14:13:00 +0000 UTC]
Impressive!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Phantafan [2019-03-04 13:45:11 +0000 UTC]
Hatzegopteryx was one of the most interesting animals ever. It looks terrifying but also very majestic. Nice work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ThePrimevalArtist [2019-03-04 13:09:41 +0000 UTC]
So this is why God sent the meteorite
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
XenoTeeth3 [2019-03-04 10:37:00 +0000 UTC]
Now thats a face only a mother could love
👍: 0 ⏩: 0