HOME | DD

tanya-n — BirdMan by-nc-nd

Published: 2006-12-29 21:21:33 +0000 UTC; Views: 782; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 10
Redirect to original
Description This is what a print looks like after Snappy Snaps ruins the negative and then tries to edit it 3 times to get it looking decent.

I really liked this one - it's a shame it was messed up, but I don't think it looks too shabby now.

Tri-X 400, Nikon EM
Related content
Comments: 24

JohannesLaaksonen [2012-10-08 15:07:35 +0000 UTC]

Great moment! Good work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ActiveShooter [2011-06-14 01:09:01 +0000 UTC]

Looks like a classic!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

aychlq [2007-06-18 22:40:09 +0000 UTC]

good photo for peace..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tanya-n In reply to aychlq [2007-06-25 09:33:39 +0000 UTC]

Glad you think so

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pictographer [2007-03-27 03:41:56 +0000 UTC]

I think it is beautiful despite the ruined negatives.
Great shot! :]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tanya-n In reply to Pictographer [2007-03-27 13:39:12 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

krippen [2007-01-05 15:15:18 +0000 UTC]

lovely photograph. i like grainy vignetting. is that what snappy snaps did? if so, it was worth it for this shot...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tanya-n In reply to krippen [2007-01-07 18:42:05 +0000 UTC]

Nah, Snappy Snaps ruined the negs and therefore gave me weird prints. They then edited them twice and this was the end result. This would have come out a LOT better had they not ruined the negs

I'm glad you like this though

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Treamus [2006-12-31 22:25:54 +0000 UTC]

This is great, it reminds me of those old British postcards from Brighton and Blackpool in the 50's. Plus its Tri-x and shot with a EM, whats not to like. Also most high street shops are geared for c-41 colour film, not B&W. Believe me I managed a one hour photo for a year and trained in dozens of staff, 95% of people that work in those places don't know shit.

Also get your self some Kodak D-76 Developer, some stop bath, and fixer. Block out the window in your bathroom, and here's a website that will tell you the rest. [link]

You'll smell real good as well when you use this stuff. :wink:

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tanya-n In reply to Treamus [2007-01-01 20:17:12 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for your comment and for the info Eventually I'll get around to developing my own stuff - when I have a little more time!

In the meantime I'll be going to a 'proper' lab to get my b&w stuff done! No more high-street rubbish.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

12a [2006-12-31 05:21:38 +0000 UTC]

fantastic moment! just dont give film to a lab any sort of panchromatic or even c41

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tanya-n In reply to 12a [2007-01-01 20:17:51 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for your comment - and yes, I won't be doing that now. >__<

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

poprage [2006-12-30 12:24:31 +0000 UTC]

this deserves a DD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tanya-n In reply to poprage [2006-12-30 18:29:56 +0000 UTC]

I'm honoured that you think so!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lion65 [2006-12-30 11:49:55 +0000 UTC]

I like how nicely you captured a moment of sharing..
good work!..

LION

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tanya-n In reply to Lion65 [2006-12-30 18:28:28 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

silen [2006-12-29 23:33:12 +0000 UTC]

beautiful moment, and I love the noise!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tanya-n In reply to silen [2006-12-30 18:28:11 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Binda23 [2006-12-29 23:20:41 +0000 UTC]

process your own photos its much more fun

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tanya-n In reply to Binda23 [2006-12-30 18:27:51 +0000 UTC]

I'll get around to learning it sometime I'm sure

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Binda23 In reply to tanya-n [2006-12-30 18:33:05 +0000 UTC]

itll certainly save you money and give you control over your work - i hate those processing shops

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jerkbot01 [2006-12-29 21:28:52 +0000 UTC]

not bad considering the trauma it has been through.

However...the noise? is that due to the mangled processing or, other factors?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

minkeymonkey In reply to jerkbot01 [2008-02-18 20:05:58 +0000 UTC]

you make it sound like the noise ruins it.
i personally think the noise adds a quality to the photo that would be lost without it.
with the noise it feels like this picture is old and gives the whole scene a different atmosphere. if it were crisp and clear i don't think it would be quite the same.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tanya-n In reply to jerkbot01 [2006-12-29 21:37:02 +0000 UTC]

Mangled processing

👍: 0 ⏩: 0