Comments: 23
blushark [2007-01-19 17:40:40 +0000 UTC]
great shot, love the composition and especially the way man turned out, his pose, face expression... i know you're shooting with 350D, but this shot seemed odd, i could swear it was real b&w film judging by grain, tonality, details in highlight...so i read the description and realized it actually really is film!
btw, have you ever tried non-C41 ilfords? delta, hp5+? great stuff...
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
tanya-n In reply to blushark [2007-01-19 20:22:39 +0000 UTC]
It's funny how when you start to use film you can differentiate between the quality of film and digital right away.
Yes, I've used fp4 plus but that's about - a couple of examples:
[link] and [link]
Lovely film - I should use that again, and I should probably try some other Ilford films as well. Any particular recommendations?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tanya-n In reply to blushark [2007-01-20 18:24:21 +0000 UTC]
Ahh - for a sec I was all confused!
Great shots there btw - I love b&w film. I'm going to experiment some more with Ilford's film but also Tri-x.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ioky [2007-01-05 11:00:11 +0000 UTC]
cool..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ioky [2007-01-05 10:59:57 +0000 UTC]
cool..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sothenkylesays [2007-01-03 22:56:19 +0000 UTC]
i wish you had judged over just a bit further to the right. i love the texture of the seats.. they look like shattered glass.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tanya-n In reply to sothenkylesays [2007-01-04 23:02:19 +0000 UTC]
Yeah I agree - it was a spontaneous shot though - didn't have much time to move across. Thanks for the comment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
greylagoon [2007-01-03 22:47:23 +0000 UTC]
pretty fun photo. I would have liked to see the mouvement of the door, would have been cool!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tanya-n In reply to greylagoon [2007-01-04 23:02:39 +0000 UTC]
Then the guy wouldn't have been visible!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
greylagoon In reply to tanya-n [2007-01-05 10:46:51 +0000 UTC]
it would have been harder, but still possible to see the guy!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Diskill [2007-01-03 22:25:34 +0000 UTC]
This picture seems much more authentic than your description of the "posed dog" pictures. Not because of the dog, but because you managed to establish a connection between you the man while taking pictures of his dog.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Diskill In reply to Diskill [2007-01-03 22:28:29 +0000 UTC]
...between you and the man
👍: 0 ⏩: 0