Comments: 17
Blazing-Saint [2017-08-18 06:49:45 +0000 UTC]
it's a fighter cruiser I thought it was a mask still awesome work
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
General-Zaldyrn [2013-10-18 02:29:22 +0000 UTC]
that looks pretty cool! i like the wings especially,they look bladed O:
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
EmperorMyric [2013-10-17 20:29:54 +0000 UTC]
finally someone else who actually uses independant fighter craft. Nobody else uses fighters with FTL apart from me and obviously now the Normans
👍: 0 ⏩: 4
Krag7 In reply to EmperorMyric [2013-12-31 20:16:17 +0000 UTC]
i do!(i'm running through soundwave's gallery right now XD)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
General-Zaldyrn In reply to EmperorMyric [2013-10-19 00:11:55 +0000 UTC]
yes. all of thier starfighters have ascension drives so they can make advance flash strikes against enemy forces,much like the rebels in star wars had ftl drives on alot of thier fighters.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GratefulReflex In reply to EmperorMyric [2013-10-18 16:09:19 +0000 UTC]
Yup it's so standard I don't make a fuss over it. By nexus RP definition you cant call it a starfighter unless it's got full shields, inertial dampening devices and FTL propulsion. In short SSC doesn't even make starfighters without that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EmperorMyric In reply to GratefulReflex [2013-10-18 17:42:40 +0000 UTC]
hmmm... fair enough, I have to say i see alot of people with ship dependant fighters
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GratefulReflex In reply to EmperorMyric [2013-10-19 02:31:56 +0000 UTC]
I think it boils down to a logistical issue. tech can only do so much and fighters no matter the type eventually have to land somewhere for upkeep. SSC realizes it's better to have a carrier if only for the pilots sake eve if my faction doesn't make starfighters that lack FTL capability.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EmperorMyric In reply to GratefulReflex [2013-10-19 18:43:39 +0000 UTC]
Very true, we do that concept too though our pilots go out, patrol for a few hours then jump back to whatever staging area they can, be it a carrier, planet or deep space base
👍: 0 ⏩: 0