HOME | DD
robinmitchell β ScientistsDebunkGlobalWarming
Published: 2009-12-30 02:29:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 5831; Favourites: 111; Downloads: 147
Redirect to original
Description
Yup folks global warming is a hoax so they can add another tax to your wallet. Think about it for a second....the same people who created this situation, your government, is going to fix it? Come on people let's wake up.[link]
Related content
Comments: 87
ABSOLUTELY SUNSPOT ON BROTHA! WERD!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Cool picture
But I'm not so sure about site that advertise a weapons course plus a FREE handgun. Meh.
π: 0 β©: 2
oh and Shanks for the kind words
π: 0 β©: 0
there is a good reason why the USA constitution made sure every citizen had the right to bare arms. it's the only way to defend yourself from tyrannical governments. Cities like New York and Chicago have huge control laws and guess what.... worst crime towns! PROPERLY prescribe medication kills more often than hand guns and you wonder why your government isn't desperately trying to control them?
π: 0 β©: 1
I think cities like NY and Chicago have problems because people live there like chickens in a cage who slowly go mad and start hacking each other. And to give them more effective ways to do this won't help them.
Also, a tyrannical government is a symptom, not the cause. People get the leaders they deserve. If you weigh your religion over your freedom of speech you get religious fanatics who use your beliefs as a tool to control you.
π: 0 β©: 1
"I think cities like NY and Chicago have problems because people live there like chickens in a cage who slowly go mad and start hacking each other. And to give them more effective ways to do this won't help them."
your grabbing this out of thin air. but I am not here is the research:
[link]
tyrannical government is a symptom of the people i would agree but how the people got to that state was also manipulated by the government which is lobby by groups such as the CFR. Find out how this little group is shaping government and how many presidents and vice president have been members. CFR was created by one david rockerfeller who openly in his autobiography calle "Memoirs"on pg 405 says he and his family are out to destroy the USA and is dam proud of it! these people aren't hidding their agendas.
i sppoke nothing about religion!! or freedom of speech!! both are protected in the constitution along with gun control. how do you think this is a bad thing?
do you think the constitution is as bush said "just a piece of paper?"
π: 0 β©: 0
I certainly do not agree. If don't believe in global warming you haven't been monitoring the poles of this planet for the last 25 years. Thankfully there are those that do.
π: 0 β©: 1
i urge you to read the report! plus have you heard of climate gate? if not look it up.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'll happily read the report. But you need to do your homework too. Don't sit idle. Seek out new information and act to reduce your impact on the environment.
π: 0 β©: 1
there has been global warming mate but the last few years it has been cooling. the argument is whether global warming is man made or natural. climate gate is exposing the fact that we have been cooling in the last few years so hence it should be cut and dry as to the fact that it's not carbon emission since none has significantly cut back on emissions for that change to have occurred. and the fact that the poles were shrinking isn't in question. in point of fact they were and now they are actually growing back. the only real factor on climate change which has been a constant in earths history is the sun.
we do need true environmentalism for sure. but our governments have always been in the way of those moments for years and will continue to get in their way (mark my words). the best example is the electric car and how that has been killed over and over.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ah, now I'm hearing some sensibility. There's no doubt a warming trend and it directly correlates to carbon in the atmosphere. Both have been measured extensively for the last 25-30 years. There are always fluctuations, but the trend is up.
π: 0 β©: 1
correction the trend is down! and has been for a while. you're only getting your info from the ipcc model and climate is exposing this! and if your going to mention other peer reviewed studies mark my words if you read the study it will say the data is going from the ipcc model. I dont mind having a debate mate. i have read both side of this issue and you don't seem to be reading the info i am providing you with the evidence to the contrary.
π: 0 β©: 1
Sounds like somebody's meniscus is touching the bottom of the graduated cylinder. Evidence to the contrary needs to be vetted and reviewed by a significantly large pool of peers. Short of incontrovertible proof there will always be disparagements. And shouting doesn't improve one's position. I'd rather put my stock in the majority opinion, till that proof comes along.
π: 0 β©: 1
shouting? whose shouting? and your response is falling into the ad hominem attacks because you fail to debate the arguments and evidence. but I will debunk your stance. You want peer reviews well here you go....
how does 30,000 plus scientists including 9,029 with PhDs
[link]
π: 0 β©: 2
Climate change is real though, whether it is man made or not. Checked out one of your books Robin...killer stuff.
π: 0 β©: 1
right on mate, that's why the earth has had an ice age. it is in perpetual climate change. glad you liked the book
π: 0 β©: 0
Ah I hoped you would reply. Let's vet your article. Hmmm. First, the site, hmmm... some corner of the interwebs... "infowars" hmmm... Alex Jone's, who might this be... hmmm.. scientist, mathematician?? Oh, no. He's a talk show radio host, "Mainstream news sources have referred to him as right-wing, conservative" hmmm... very suspicious. Certainly not unbiased... Ok Let's check out the good professor Richard Siegmund Lindzen... hmmm.. "He has been a critic of some global warming theories and what he states are political pressures on climate scientists" oh very nice. Yes, quite an unbiased approach to the issue. Yes quite unbiased.
Well, my work is finished here. I part with this nice link for you... [link]
π: 0 β©: 1
An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument toward the person" or "argument against the person") is an argument which links the validity of a premise to an irrelevant characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise.
in laymen terms (specially for you mate) you are attacking the man's character not his evidence and that is not a debate. but if you really believe you have dealt with the facts then keeping living in that delusion.
LMAO!!! you clearly didn't read your article because it did not say anything about global warming and its effects on the Artic ocean melting!!! You are what Staling called a "USEFUL IDIOT" you have no idea how to think or even vet the articles you even send me.
here is a great quote from your article and as close as you can get
"Among the more worrisome questions raised by a more turbulent Arctic Ocean is whether or not it could speed up the melting of Arctic sea ice.
"That's a big open question," Rainville said. "It's possible because the Arctic is a very peculiar ocean." "
LMAO
π: 0 β©: 0
great angle Hope to see it coloured!
π: 0 β©: 1
Shanks!! but it wont see color because I'm just not that in love with it
π: 0 β©: 1
aww boo! the drawing rocks!!!!it screams for colour!
π: 0 β©: 1
you got some mad coloring skills! have at it
π: 0 β©: 1
really? sweet! I'll take a shot at it maybe near the end of the month when the schedule clears!!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
now i got something to look forward too! cheers!
π: 0 β©: 1
i'll be sure to send you heads up when I finish! pretty jived to colour this one.. love the drawing!
π: 0 β©: 1
not sure I agree, but nice drawing
π: 0 β©: 1
i urge you to read the report! google climate gate! find out if you are being hood winked or not
π: 0 β©: 0
WERD to the like minded
π: 0 β©: 0
<= Prev |