HOME | DD

pinkythepink β€” Storykeeper

#black #blackhair #book #bookmark #crossstitch #crossstitching #embroidery #female #girl #haed #lady #librarian #library #longhair #read #reading #sewing #story #storyteller #woman #xstitch #xstitching #petitepoint #storykeeper #puntodecruz #pointdecroix #heavenandearthdesigns #storykeep #storytelling
Published: 2017-03-21 05:21:27 +0000 UTC; Views: 24140; Favourites: 630; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description

Full Shop | Etsy | Facebook | Instagram


Here's my final submission piece for my group stitchingpirates Finish The WIP Contest . Here was my starter entry:


FIRSTTTT PLACEEEEE

This is my very first, and hopefully very last, Heaven and Earth Designs (commonly HAED) pattern. This particular pattern comes from a series of "Storykeeps", bookmarks, which are essentially cropped sections of larger artwork. When Mattsma picked this pattern up for me a few years ago as a gift its title was simply Storykeeper Storykeep and was genuinely the only pattern on the whole of the website I thought I might do. And they have a lot of patterns. This bit of original artwork is by Selina Fenech and, if I'm reading the PDF correctly, the pattern for HAED was created by Michele Sayetta.

This is stitched over-one on linen, and if you cross-stitch like a regular human you'll know that that becomes dangerous business as stitches have a tendency to slip under and into the fabric weave itself. It's also stitched with one thread. For comparison, the grand majority of pieces I do on linen are over-two with two threads! The over-one nature of this piece both cuts down on the bulkiness (the stitches are awfully close together) and stops it from being nearly two feet tall. It also means with the 25 count linen that I could fit 25 stitches per inch - this piece is a mere 51 stitches wide which allows the two inch width.

I started this back in October and put it back down for all the work I've been caught up in. Then, a little counter intuitively, I took it with me to work at H&R Block. Since all I'm doing is answering the phone, setting appointments, filing, etc, when I'm between tasks my bossman lets me work on stitching, beading, and such. Well when I'm stuck at a desk waiting for the phone to ring for several hours and there's no internet to distract me I get a whollllllle lot of work done. So this was finished in just about a month! Customers coming in often commented on what I was doing, and how I must be going blind, or how they used to cross-stitch but don't do it anymore and it was never that tiny but oh gosh what hard work you do yessss thank you would you like to make an appointment already-

On one part, I am really happy with how this turned out. My stitches are clean, the colors went together as they should, the final piece is nice enough that I went and got it framed for myself. It is truly something I was happy to show off to customers coming in and will be something I continue to be proud of when Mom predictably waltzes people into my room to boast. Can you hear the "but"?

But.... this style of stitching simply isn't my thing. I'm reluctant to complain about it because I know - I know - that a great amount of patterns, especially those sold en masse all around the web and those given out as freebies, are done in this style. Before I really got into my own design work these types of patterns are the ones I was making, and I even stitched a few. Most prominently, Resonant from cosmicbound 's artwork is done this way:

And many of the freebie prize patterns I do for stitchingpirates are done in this way, like this one Katjakay finished of her own photograph:

And! That's just fine. Because a lot of people have no grief or complaints with this style of stitching. HAED and people who swear by this style will tell you: it's simple. There's no backstitching, there's no beads, no partial stitches or anything fancy. Just Xs.

Now... HAED is big. Like, they sell in magazines, and there's organized foreign piracy boards that make a point of knowing when HAED has a sale so that they can hoard up as much of it as they can and spread the patterns around. Oddly enough, while I'm comfortable tearing down problems with designers I greatly admire, when it comes to HAED I find myself horribly intimidated. Obviously Mirabilia has similar magazine sales and a good percentage of piracy out there, but still when I worked on my Dressmaker's Daughter piece I pointed out all the things I didn't like and made changes and had no second thoughts about it. Honestly, I don't know why it's different, and it's not going to stop me from continuing on below, but I thought it worth mentioning. It's weird for me to be so up and bothered about sharing my complaints.

HAED is worthy because they have an amazing selection of artists under their belt. Amy Brown is the notable name for me, since I grew up with her artwork in my home. And I thought a lot about it: if you wanted amazing artwork like Amy Brown in cross stitch, HAED is the place you go. And, far as I know, artists like Amy Brown don't really care what a cross-stitch pattern turns out to be. They get the royalties for use and may not even know, let alone care, about things I consider to be quality control. Case in point: the Storykeeper pattern was hardly readable to me. It came in a PDF, which was fine, and the symbols were clear, which was appreciated, but the symbols were obviously not chosen by hand.

How do I know this? Because they're using either the same program I use for my patterns or a very similar one. The symbols started out as 50 and when I opened up my program to convert it into symbols I could actually read wouldn't you know it - the 50 symbols on the chart were exactly the same first 50 symbols the program automatically selects for you. Which means a few symbols that're terribly similar, like, say, a dot and a circle, end up being next to each other on the chart.

There's also, like in the majority of computer generated patterns, no color condensing. This could be a stylistic choice, since eliminating that one slighty-off-shade-of-tan for a very similar slightly-off-shade-of-tan to lower the color count is something HAED just doesn't do... but I suspect its more that when they generate the pattern they don't go through and go, "Hey, you know, that pale shade of blue is used for an entire two stitches in the piece, maybe it's just not needed". Again, how do I know this? It's because I used to do it in my pattern generation.

What really ended up steaming me as I stitched this was a request that came in to me for a custom pattern back in January this year. My customer wanted a piece converted from an artist here on DA, she even got the permissions and everything and was ready to go! And she wanted it in HAED's no backstitching, no fancy nonsense, massive tapestry style. So what was her problem? Why did she come to me? It's because HAED charges an absurd $125 to do what takes hardly an hour, and - yes, I am sure they are busy with how large their business is - say it'll take 4-6 weeks to complete the order.

Insert a dramatic pause for me right here, because that is beyond unreasonable. My customer-to-be told me I should up my custom pattern pricing because of it, but really it flared me up so bad I wanted to just do everything for free! How dare they charge so much! Name recognition. "I have a custom HAED chart!" Except, unlike designer clothing brands, HAED is nothing but a reflection of my early beginner, no skill, two seconds of computer generated work.

So... yeah... I have grief with them.

...but even still, this piece is really pretty.

I'm just not happy about it.

Other than the pattern redrawing that I did for myself the 'large' change I made to the actual pattern was removing a shade of blue (or purple?) that was only used for two or three stitches, I can't remember now, lowering the color count from 50 to 49. I also replaced all the randomly inserted Kreinik with plain white because honestly, HAED, can you just take two seconds to make a pattern adjustment, the white on her skin does not randomly begin sparkling, and I didn't have it in me to stitch Kreinik into 25 count linen over-one. Otherwise... there's really nothing to this piece. It's only X's. No partials, no backstitching, no beads. I would complain about a lack of blended colors, but seeing as these are "designed" to be over-one it's not that surprising.
Alright I'm done whining.

Color Total: 49
Size: 2 x 10.25 inches stitching
Time: 94 hours
25 Count ivory Linen

Related content
Comments: 91

pinkythepink In reply to ??? [2023-05-07 17:14:44 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TicklishAndInLove [2021-08-17 08:56:37 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to TicklishAndInLove [2021-08-23 06:03:01 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

giusynuno [2019-12-16 14:11:52 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to giusynuno [2019-12-17 21:35:03 +0000 UTC]

Aaaaaaa thank you, this is from forever ago!! Definitely tell your aunt that she's not alone, nobody should be alone in this.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BellaGBear [2018-05-27 22:12:22 +0000 UTC]

I like this ALso very interesting to read what you have to say about HAED. Previously I mainly heart positive stories because one of my first cross stitch group has a HAED one.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to BellaGBear [2018-05-28 21:10:36 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! Yeah, everywhere I look on the internet seems to be an endless shower of praise for them, it was making me buggy. I need some confirmation bias!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BellaGBear In reply to pinkythepink [2018-05-29 16:36:04 +0000 UTC]

haha it's always dodgy when something only gets praise. I always thought HAED's where trying to be big for big's sake. Haven't tried them for myself (yet) though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ankelwar [2017-08-31 15:47:51 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to Ankelwar [2017-08-31 18:16:08 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PrincessCottontail [2017-07-19 16:35:44 +0000 UTC]

Very sweet.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to PrincessCottontail [2017-07-21 06:44:50 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xXMulti-Bunny-ChanXx [2017-07-18 23:59:26 +0000 UTC]

Β Absolutely beautiful!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to xXMulti-Bunny-ChanXx [2017-07-19 14:23:28 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xXMulti-Bunny-ChanXx In reply to pinkythepink [2017-07-20 09:53:22 +0000 UTC]

Your welcome!^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Freya-x [2017-07-17 15:19:46 +0000 UTC]

wow, wooow....que paciencia debiste tener me encanta como bordas...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to Freya-x [2017-07-19 14:23:55 +0000 UTC]

Gracias

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nuttelaaddict44 [2017-07-16 17:19:34 +0000 UTC]

Very beautiful!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to Nuttelaaddict44 [2017-07-17 10:02:45 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nuttelaaddict44 In reply to pinkythepink [2017-07-17 22:18:26 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Hand-Sam-Art [2017-07-16 07:16:44 +0000 UTC]

"I am the Writer of the story, the guardian of the words ... the decision of the outcome."

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PeriodicFable [2017-07-16 05:55:33 +0000 UTC]

Oh, this is beautiful. I am glad you framed it for yourself - you should be proud of your efforts! The means really do justify the ends if you feel content with this, and when it is as breathtaking as it is.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to PeriodicFable [2017-07-17 10:03:18 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much! I ammmmm pretty proud of the results but what a process!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheStarlightPrincess [2017-06-23 17:12:32 +0000 UTC]

Very pretty!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to TheStarlightPrincess [2017-06-28 22:15:38 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mattsma [2017-05-30 16:15:38 +0000 UTC]

In person, AGAIN, far more beautiful!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to Mattsma [2017-05-31 05:21:37 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

denofshadows [2017-04-27 22:42:25 +0000 UTC]

LOVE this bookmark.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to denofshadows [2017-04-28 20:15:35 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

horrorfreakjuh [2017-04-24 14:54:41 +0000 UTC]

Great outcome
i have to say I fully agree with what you are saying about haed, I have a stash of them to but still I agree but there are Some more thing about them that my mind says are your seriously thinking I would belive that? I do make my own charts every now and then most are from anime series and games. But like hell I would never ask anyone when they want a chart to let them pay that I think it's a shame asking so much but that is me.
but back on your work it's really great

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to horrorfreakjuh [2017-04-26 06:00:41 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad I'm not alone in this! Thank you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

horrorfreakjuh In reply to pinkythepink [2017-04-27 15:15:09 +0000 UTC]

I'm happy about that to you know but i'm sure there are more people who think that right

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Thriin [2017-04-02 14:04:35 +0000 UTC]

I LOVE the outcome!!Β Β  I have quite a few *ahem* HEAD charts, even requested one mini but I agree their custom charting is absurd, if people are willing to pay it's everyone choice but it is expensive like hell. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to Thriin [2017-04-02 19:26:42 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! That's alright it's the style you like and there's nothing wrong with that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Stalwartt [2017-03-30 07:02:39 +0000 UTC]

She beautiul :3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to Stalwartt [2017-03-30 22:46:16 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Stalwartt In reply to pinkythepink [2017-03-31 04:28:31 +0000 UTC]

😁

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mattsma [2017-03-29 04:23:15 +0000 UTC]

This is an incredible critique. Β The patterns I have were selected carefully because of the potential for stitching a huge blurry thing I see so often on the larger pieces. Β Your pattern was lovely and has some definition. Β I'm very hopeful that mine come out just as nicely.Β 

As you know, I'm already poo poo-ing the background on the Bubbles pattern as I feel those colors should be blended Β And I'm ranting. Β Sorry! Β Beautiful critique, so well done!Β  Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to Mattsma [2017-03-30 22:46:44 +0000 UTC]

HAED just inspires ranting, I say!
Thanks Carla

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mattsma In reply to pinkythepink [2017-07-05 19:34:01 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

theIceOrchid [2017-03-23 22:07:44 +0000 UTC]

This looks really awesome. Love it. Well done and thanks for showing this^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to theIceOrchid [2017-03-24 16:25:04 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Phenometron [2017-03-22 12:27:38 +0000 UTC]

So beautiful. <3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to Phenometron [2017-03-22 16:09:00 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ToveAnita [2017-03-22 10:18:23 +0000 UTC]

Β Gorgeous!! Fantastic embroidering, well done!! Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to ToveAnita [2017-03-22 16:09:05 +0000 UTC]

Thank you much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ururuty [2017-03-22 04:47:08 +0000 UTC]

nice work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to Ururuty [2017-03-22 16:09:10 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DarkCat273 [2017-03-22 02:25:22 +0000 UTC]

Wow! This is beautiful!^~^ I can't believe how much detail you put in to these, truly wonderful work!πŸ‘πŸ‘ŒπŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pinkythepink In reply to DarkCat273 [2017-03-22 16:09:15 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>