Comments: 14
Morisan [2010-03-30 17:26:23 +0000 UTC]
This is a lovely study. I want to do similar studies so I was wondering from what source did you study and what aspects did you focus on?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
junon In reply to Morisan [2010-03-31 03:08:26 +0000 UTC]
thank you :]
The sources I referenced was just a few select images that returned from a google search to study atmospheric lighting (nothing I can directly recall).
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Antimony-and-Lace [2009-01-19 20:13:45 +0000 UTC]
Wow that is amazing! And you did it in an hour!? Inhuman!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
junon In reply to Antimony-and-Lace [2009-01-21 04:22:54 +0000 UTC]
thanks :] I just wish I had more free time to do more of them :\
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Archaia [2007-10-14 04:42:18 +0000 UTC]
wow, beautiful. This one is great.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
duesterheit [2007-10-13 21:01:17 +0000 UTC]
that is great
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PaulReinwand [2007-10-10 00:35:10 +0000 UTC]
Really nailed it this time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BenDouglasUK [2007-10-09 22:09:19 +0000 UTC]
Excellent work, the perspective and atmospherics give the impression that the river and mountains could just go on and on and on and on... Massive improvement on your last one as the composition guides the viewers eye and culminates in the focal point of the sun and impressionistic mountains.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
numbchild [2007-10-09 19:04:04 +0000 UTC]
this is really nicely executed! hte trees look much less harsh and grainy than previously. and that perspective is spot on!
nice
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jambe [2007-10-09 16:20:04 +0000 UTC]
Huzzah! Looks like there's a bit more planning-out of the river's path in this than in your speed from a few days ago. I'm digging the haze.
The river's path is a bit too much of a straight-shot affair for my taste, but that's probably because of years of watching Bob Ross randomly cut rivers into and around stuff.
* trails off, ranting about 'happy trees' and 'rocks living under some bushes' and 'tap some burnt siena in under here, maybe some open soil lives in this shade' *
👍: 0 ⏩: 0