Comments: 36
Aprion [2017-05-25 07:14:26 +0000 UTC]
heh the background cameos XD samus, a hanar, and a... borg pony if my eyes dont deceive me.
π: 0 β©: 1
jamescorck In reply to Aprion [2017-06-29 17:06:43 +0000 UTC]
Your eyes are most certainly correct!
That's a Borg pone.
π: 0 β©: 0
tigreanpony [2017-05-16 11:51:01 +0000 UTC]
Rainbow as Han, clever.
π: 0 β©: 1
jamescorck In reply to tigreanpony [2017-05-23 23:42:47 +0000 UTC]
It's Pirate Dash, who's an expert on puns and a dirty scoundrel.
π: 0 β©: 0
catluvr2 [2017-05-05 14:27:46 +0000 UTC]
Obi-Pun Kenobi? I approve.
And including other references? Samus always, I see.
π: 0 β©: 1
Maverickwolfzx [2017-05-05 03:42:16 +0000 UTC]
The only reason I can not decide if I like this movie more or "The Empire Strikes Back" is for the combat in the Death Star. I'm not so much of Jedis, I'm a fan of Star Wars for their fightings in vehicle, and with that you can make the idea that I love Rogue One.
π: 0 β©: 1
jamescorck In reply to Maverickwolfzx [2017-05-23 23:47:19 +0000 UTC]
I am a fan of the grunts in Star Wars as well. I adored Rogue One as well. It was a very gritty take on the universe.
π: 0 β©: 0
L-MASTER [2017-05-05 02:41:27 +0000 UTC]
Grandioso XDDDD
en espacial por Samus de fondo XD
π: 0 β©: 1
MorcegoCinzento [2017-05-04 17:31:05 +0000 UTC]
Nice Samus and Borg pony cameos on the background, and also the Hanar bartenderΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
Twylite-Sparkle [2017-05-04 16:50:33 +0000 UTC]
Think of the ear-piercing screeches that come from this Chewbacca...
π: 0 β©: 1
jamescorck In reply to Twylite-Sparkle [2017-05-23 23:43:17 +0000 UTC]
Oh those are fine, they are just a series of constant raspberries.
π: 0 β©: 0
BenRG [2017-05-04 16:20:16 +0000 UTC]
Rainbow, you need to put a bit into the pun jar. Now.
π: 0 β©: 1
jamescorck In reply to BenRG [2017-05-23 23:43:39 +0000 UTC]
I think she's got to put about several bits in that jar.
π: 0 β©: 0
FrankRT [2017-05-04 16:01:47 +0000 UTC]
Which version of the film is this review referring to?
π: 0 β©: 1
jamescorck In reply to FrankRT [2017-05-23 23:44:18 +0000 UTC]
The original, unaltered version, before the special editions were released in 1997. I grew up watching the original versions, and I got all three on DVD.
π: 0 β©: 1
FrankRT In reply to jamescorck [2017-05-24 09:37:57 +0000 UTC]
Oh cool! I have the Despecialized Editions - you heard of them?
π: 0 β©: 1
jamescorck In reply to FrankRT [2017-06-29 18:53:39 +0000 UTC]
I have, I'd rather stay with the original cuts.
π: 0 β©: 1
FrankRT In reply to jamescorck [2017-06-29 20:40:23 +0000 UTC]
Well they sort of are. Reconstructions to be exact, but it's about as good as they come.
π: 0 β©: 1
jamescorck In reply to FrankRT [2017-06-30 00:01:48 +0000 UTC]
Then they sort of aren't. A reconstruction isn't an original.
π: 0 β©: 1
FrankRT In reply to jamescorck [2017-06-30 10:19:12 +0000 UTC]
True, true. But they'll have to do until Disney put out HD versions of the original... assuming of course that they do.
π: 0 β©: 1
jamescorck In reply to FrankRT [2017-07-01 09:38:31 +0000 UTC]
I doubt that will ever happen.
Last time I checked the home video distribution rights still belong to 20th Century FOX, at least for the original trilogy and the prequels.
There's also the issue of the aspect ratio, and how much quality can be taken from copies that were made in 1977.
π: 0 β©: 1
FrankRT In reply to jamescorck [2017-07-01 10:12:45 +0000 UTC]
Yeah... exactly.
π: 0 β©: 0
Xmen1991 [2017-05-04 15:38:26 +0000 UTC]
When can we expect new reviews from Movie Slate?
π: 0 β©: 1
Tin-Foil-Hat-101 [2017-05-04 15:28:41 +0000 UTC]
Is that jelly fish thing in the background from Mass Effect?Β
π: 0 β©: 2
DasMojobro In reply to Tin-Foil-Hat-101 [2017-05-05 00:59:21 +0000 UTC]
I was thinking that as well, I think they were called the Hanar.
Its totally a Hanar.
π: 0 β©: 0