HOME | DD

HouseOfHesse — The United Kingdom of Iberia

#algarve #alternate #andalusia #aragon #asturias #baleares #basque #cartography #castile #castilla #catalonia #europe #euskadi #extremadura #galicia #galiza #history #iberia #iberian #leon #map #murcia #portugal #sardigna #sardinia #spain #union #valencia #aragó #macaronesia #llión #vasconia #iberian_union #alt_his #capeverde #alternate_history
Published: 2016-04-02 15:51:33 +0000 UTC; Views: 20629; Favourites: 187; Downloads: 230
Redirect to original
Description Had this on a back-burner for ages, finally got around to finishing it!
This is my interpretation of what a united Iberia might look like today had the Portuguese restoration war of 1640 been unsuccessful (and with Aragon hanging on to Sardinia and everyone hanging on to some colonies a bit longer. Sorry Morocco.)
For those unfamiliar with this chapter in the history of Iberia, the union of the crowns of Castile, Aragon, and Portugal occurred between 1580 and 1640 as the result of a series of dynastically-minded marriages. Beginning with the marriage of Isabella I of Castile and Ferdinand II of Aragon, the crowns of these two realms were united in their daughter Joanna I. Obviously with this being the late Middle-Ages/early Renaissance era, Joanna was deemed incapable of ruling alone because she was a woman and maybe a little insane, thus her her husband Phillip, who had an impressive array of titles of his own (He was Phillip I if you were in the newly formed realm of Spain, and either Phillip II, III, or IV depending on where you were in Burgundy or the Netherlands), was named as her co-ruler, thus beginning several centuries of Habsburg rule over Spain. They were succeeded by their son Charles I/II/III/IV/V (again, another impressive array of titles), and then by his son Phillip II (husband of Mary I of England) who, after the death of the childless King of Portugal, also sought to claim the Portuguese throne too, because apparently all his dozens of other titles just weren't enough for him. As the grandson of a former monarch of Portugal, Phillip held the favour of the Council of Governors of Portugal despite one of his rivals, Antonio, being declared King initially. However, after a short war, Phillip successfully enforced his claim to the throne, and thus the Iberian Union was born.
Come 1640, Portugal decides it's fed up of non-Portuguese monarchs, and thus a rebellion ensues. Whilst in OTL this rebellion was successful, in this timeline it was not, with both John of Braganza and his heir Afonso being captured by Phillip IV & III.
Initially the three Iberian realms remained distinctly separate entities, each with its own army, government, and citizenship. Indeed, it is more accurately described as a personal union than a union de jure, however by the time 1700 rolled around, there was a very high degree of integration between the realms. When the famously incapable Habsburg king Charles II died childless in 1700, the war of the Iberian succession ensued with Charles II bequeathing his realm to Phillip, Duke of Anjou, the second-eldest grandson of King Louis XIV of France of the House of Bourbon, whilst the Habsburg dynasty in Austria sought to secure it for the Archduke Charles of Austria. By 1714, the Bourbons had won the war, and Phillip took the throne as Phillip V, and formally united his realm into a single, united kingdom the following year. Over the following centuries, numerous reforms (and a fairly lengthy republican dictatorship) transformed Iberia into the modern federal monarchy that it is today.

My knowledge of any of the Iberian languages, and Romance languages in general, is appalling, so I apologise for the shoddy translation! My approach was that the labels are in the official language of the state where they are located, thus labels in Catalonia are in Catalan, labels in Castile are in Castilian, labels in Portugal are in Portuguese, etc.

I also made a (new, better) flag , coat of arms Wikipedia-style country info-box , and an election info-box  to accompany this map.

DISCLAIMER: This in no way represents my views on Iberia, Spain, Portugal, Andorra, or any other country featured (real or fictitious), Spanish/Iberian irredentism, Iberian unionism, Portuguese people, Spanish people, other Iberian people in general, or irredentism/pan-nationalism as a whole. It is a work of fiction, not a political statement, and is not intended to cause offence. Please refrain from making political or offensive statements in the comments, lest you shall be subject to my wrath. That aside, comments and (constructive) criticisms are always welcome!

Related content
Comments: 32

ManinTheHighCastle94 [2024-07-29 18:11:22 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Vouriessing [2022-11-07 18:25:14 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MJ-maps-99 [2020-04-09 19:21:36 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kinginthenorthwest [2018-12-27 17:07:45 +0000 UTC]

That's a pretty neat map! Congratulations! I- wait, Coruña is the capital of Galicia? OH NO!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AntonioFL [2018-09-13 11:55:10 +0000 UTC]

 Thanks god Portuguese court never fell, as it would if we lost the restaurantion war.
  Nice map but Portugal would never became Hispanic or Castilian as they were called, lusitanians forever.
  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HispaniumII In reply to AntonioFL [2022-02-21 06:33:43 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

AntonioFL In reply to HispaniumII [2022-02-22 01:56:51 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kanar-Amazikh [2017-10-11 00:11:03 +0000 UTC]

Why don't Asturias, Extremadura, Murcia and Algarve have an actual name?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AMCAlmaron [2016-10-14 05:52:41 +0000 UTC]

Ooh, very nice! Have to ask, is there a reason why Castilla is so big? You could potentially break it up into Castilla and Toledo, going by this old administrative division (and Taifa before that); en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HouseOfHesse In reply to AMCAlmaron [2016-11-07 19:21:14 +0000 UTC]

There isn't any particular reason for it, I just quite liked the idea of having one single, united Castilian province. But you're right of course, it would perhaps be more logical to have it split into two parts (as it is today, of course)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AMCAlmaron In reply to HouseOfHesse [2016-11-07 20:13:55 +0000 UTC]

Fair enough, really...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oigolue In reply to AMCAlmaron [2018-06-19 15:52:00 +0000 UTC]

actually castillan nationalists want the union of castillan provinces, but i think the error of the map is including cantabria, which has been castilla but has a rlly diferent culture and language

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AMCAlmaron In reply to oigolue [2018-06-19 19:14:07 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, remnants of Asturian-Leonese, isn't it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oigolue In reply to AMCAlmaron [2018-06-19 20:01:22 +0000 UTC]

Cantabru, it's an astur-leonese langue, right, although it is very different from asturianu from asturies or lliones from llion, it is dying because of castellanization of cantabria, but it still alive and more and more ppl are trying to revive it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

grisador [2016-09-21 19:44:07 +0000 UTC]

Awesome alternative history !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HouseOfHesse In reply to grisador [2016-11-07 19:21:19 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

grisador In reply to HouseOfHesse [2016-11-08 21:00:31 +0000 UTC]

You're very welcome ! Very well done quality Alternate Histories; Truly Great works

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Andalucia-chan [2016-04-08 18:09:11 +0000 UTC]

Emm... Is "Dos Hermanas" no "Dos Hermanos" ^^"

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

HouseOfHesse In reply to Andalucia-chan [2016-04-09 15:34:29 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! I've fixed it now  

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Arminius1871 [2016-04-03 19:32:48 +0000 UTC]

Fantastic map, looks really professionell when I zoom in and see all the details **

I wished Iberia would unite^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HouseOfHesse In reply to Arminius1871 [2016-04-09 15:34:16 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much! It is a little large isn't it? I'd wanted to put Macaronesia in an inset but I couldn't make it look right so I had to sort of compromise like this. But at least you can see everything when it's zoomed in!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Arminius1871 In reply to HouseOfHesse [2016-04-10 15:44:18 +0000 UTC]

It´s fine for me!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Spiritswriter123 [2016-04-03 02:33:13 +0000 UTC]

I noticed that in your description, you said that Joanna was the husband of Charles I/V, but she wasn't. She was his mother, and she couldn't rule alone because she was a women, she couldn't because she was declared insane (an in all reality, she kind of was, parading her real dead husband, Phillip the Handsome, around)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HouseOfHesse In reply to Spiritswriter123 [2016-04-03 10:10:05 +0000 UTC]

Oh man I totally got Phillip and Charles the wrong way around, thanks for that!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Silas-Coldwine [2016-04-02 18:00:56 +0000 UTC]

Great map, if the African borders are too convergent for my liking... but that's just me being overtly picky.

The Spanish wasn't that shoddy after all. The text in the key is entirely right. I only detected three mistakes: Cartagena mispelled as Cartegna, that "reino" is a male word (thus, "el reino"), and that "área", while being a female word, requires of male articles because of a matter of euphonia (thus, "el área"). I think everything else is right.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HouseOfHesse In reply to Silas-Coldwine [2016-04-03 10:20:51 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I left most of North Africa as is because my knowledge of the history of the region is patchy at best. But thanks for the translation info! Glad you seem to think I didn't do a horrendous job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Enricfan In reply to HouseOfHesse [2016-04-06 21:29:35 +0000 UTC]

Gipuzkoa and 'las siguientes' (provincías) are another two typos.

Otherwise a very nicely made map  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HouseOfHesse In reply to Enricfan [2016-04-09 15:26:39 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! All fixed now  

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nanwe01 In reply to HouseOfHesse [2016-04-04 18:15:53 +0000 UTC]

Huesca is written with H in Spanish. It's a nice map. I think the administrative divisions are too convergent, but then again, that's not necessarily an issue (and I've done it myself ) I would honestly recommend splitting Castilla in two though, between north and south.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HouseOfHesse In reply to nanwe01 [2016-04-09 15:33:10 +0000 UTC]

Yes, but it's Uesca in Aragonese. Thanks! My intention was to leave it somewhat recognisable but with more of a focus on the historic components, although your suggestion would probably make it more convergent haha

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

19111995 [2016-04-02 16:09:41 +0000 UTC]

Awesome as always!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HouseOfHesse In reply to 19111995 [2016-04-02 16:31:07 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0