HOME | DD

HendrikAviationArt β€” Typhoon Coming

#262 #3d #ace #air #aircraft #airplane #aviation #aviationart #b17 #battle #bf109 #bomber #dday #digital #dogfight #fighter #force #fortress #fw190 #illustration #jet #kamikaze #luftwaffe #me109 #me262 #messerschmitt #mustang #p47 #p51 #p51b #p51d #p51mustang #raf #reich #royalairforce #spitfire #strafing #texture #thunderbolt #transport #usaaf #usaf #vehicles #vray #war #weapons #worldwar2 #ww2 #wwii #hendrik #jagdgeschwader #vray3dsmax #spitfiremkix #art #hawker #normandy #typhoon
Published: 2019-09-27 11:58:05 +0000 UTC; Views: 48987; Favourites: 995; Downloads: 316
Redirect to original
Description Hawker Typhoons crossing the channel towards Normandy in severe weather. I really like these stormy scenes Hope you like it!

Typhoon model and textures by Gareth Hector. Check out his website about his traditional paintings: www.garethhector.co.uk
Many thanks again to Piotr Forkasiewicz for his invaluable input with Vray. Check out his portfolio: www.artstation.com/peterfor

You can get prints of my work here: fineartamerica.com/profiles/ha…
Related content
Comments: 45

cullyferg2010 [2022-07-21 19:22:49 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Heptoblitz [2022-07-13 20:05:05 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Monk412 [2020-08-06 19:50:21 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PeterLuria [2020-07-22 04:00:08 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to PeterLuria [2020-07-22 07:46:21 +0000 UTC]

It is. Have a look at my fineartamerica account

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pinecone454 [2019-10-21 18:21:02 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to Pinecone454 [2019-10-24 19:21:32 +0000 UTC]

Hi, Thanks! Low level sweeps were quite common, especially for ground attack planes. Low level flights in severe weathere were not uncommon either. And yes, the Germans had radar

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MikNubby [2019-09-28 16:05:43 +0000 UTC]

Typhoons in a storm, it doesn't get any better than this. Great work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to MikNubby [2019-09-28 17:57:27 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BaguetteCh [2019-09-28 11:02:59 +0000 UTC]

Looks very good!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to BaguetteCh [2019-09-28 17:57:37 +0000 UTC]

Thx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MikeReyiz [2019-09-28 09:06:44 +0000 UTC]

oh my god this is sooo amazing!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to MikeReyiz [2019-09-28 17:57:48 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ja-Roo [2019-09-28 07:21:26 +0000 UTC]

AMAZING WORK

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to Ja-Roo [2019-09-28 17:58:07 +0000 UTC]

Thx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Konstantinsen [2019-09-28 06:48:43 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to Konstantinsen [2019-09-28 17:58:25 +0000 UTC]

Thx. That was the idea

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

cullyferg2010 [2019-09-28 03:58:07 +0000 UTC]

Too bad Hawker never came up with an aircraft called the Cyclone.Β  It would have fit the stormy family.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to cullyferg2010 [2019-09-28 17:58:42 +0000 UTC]

:-D

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cullyferg2010 In reply to HendrikAviationArt [2019-09-29 00:51:59 +0000 UTC]

Β Β Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Raid-Ho [2019-09-28 03:00:30 +0000 UTC]

Rain drop splatters make it look like the plane isn't moving.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to Raid-Ho [2019-09-28 17:59:43 +0000 UTC]

It gives the scene more details. I think the sense of speed is easily to catch

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Raid-Ho In reply to HendrikAviationArt [2019-09-29 03:55:44 +0000 UTC]

Actually no it gives very little sense of speed. Raindrops fall down almost vertically so the camera must be stationary. Then the fighter should have some amount of motion blur on it, but it doesn't. Which is fine for an imaginary camera with infinitesimal shutter timing, but that erases all sense of motion. At the same time, the prop has a lot of motion blur on it. And yet again the prop cone has none. And finally the raindrops, they have strong motion blur while falling, but they splash off aircraft surfaces in such fashion as if it was stationary. The picture has very little motion cues in general, and those that it has conflict with cues suggesting that things are stationary.


If raindrops were coming almost horizontally with very long blur lines and the splashes would arc backwards, then it would mostly be fine (rotor sheath would also need motion blur just like the prop blades).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to Raid-Ho [2019-09-29 15:15:09 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for your feedback. Thereβ€˜s always a trade off between your own artistic style and physically perfection. I like the way of the rain and the splashes to have more details on the scene. And I intentionally decided against more motion blur to have it at the minimum and have more of the scenery. The prop cone by the way has motion blur because itβ€˜s also animated. You just don’t have a lot of visible motion blur on the tip of the cone.

Looking forward to your approach!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ambaryerno [2019-09-28 01:02:57 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful piece of work. Although weather like that usually grounded aircraft during WWII...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to Ambaryerno [2019-09-28 18:01:17 +0000 UTC]

Not necessarily. There are a lot of report of flights through severe weather. The weather above the target area and at returning to the airfield had been more important factors than en route

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

StoneWarrior234 [2019-09-27 23:53:44 +0000 UTC]

Great attention to detail! Absolutely amazing!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to StoneWarrior234 [2019-09-28 18:01:29 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

warrior31992 [2019-09-27 23:43:24 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful and Stunning

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to warrior31992 [2019-09-29 10:03:04 +0000 UTC]

Thx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

warrior31992 In reply to HendrikAviationArt [2019-09-29 10:07:42 +0000 UTC]

Your Welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ckosacranoid [2019-09-27 18:48:12 +0000 UTC]

very cool setup with the rockets under the wings.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to ckosacranoid [2019-09-28 18:01:39 +0000 UTC]

Thx

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ckosacranoid In reply to HendrikAviationArt [2019-10-01 02:32:21 +0000 UTC]

no problem.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

seeker36340 [2019-09-27 18:33:49 +0000 UTC]

Imagining the panzers fleeing for the nearby forest....a rocket in the rear or top will clobber anything.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to seeker36340 [2019-09-28 18:02:32 +0000 UTC]

That’s the reputation although the real damage inflicted was quite less than anticipated

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Midway2009 [2019-09-27 18:23:23 +0000 UTC]

Superb!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to Midway2009 [2019-09-28 18:02:43 +0000 UTC]

Thanks mate!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Midway2009 In reply to HendrikAviationArt [2019-09-28 18:17:53 +0000 UTC]

you're welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NewHorizontStudio [2019-09-27 15:32:07 +0000 UTC]

Super

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to NewHorizontStudio [2019-09-28 18:02:53 +0000 UTC]

Thx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

aldonh [2019-09-27 15:07:55 +0000 UTC]

Really nice

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to aldonh [2019-09-28 18:03:01 +0000 UTC]

Thx

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

graught [2019-09-27 14:41:36 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HendrikAviationArt In reply to graught [2019-09-28 18:03:13 +0000 UTC]

Thx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0