Comments: 44
manfishinc [2010-05-06 04:04:18 +0000 UTC]
you have been featured:
[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hamrick In reply to indiradude [2006-05-18 23:55:11 +0000 UTC]
Man. Sciences. Intriguing until grades start being taken and I can't leave.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
indiradude In reply to Hamrick [2006-05-19 09:00:52 +0000 UTC]
So true. It was good. Till I was rubbish at it. ¬_¬
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NickTassone [2005-12-04 02:15:21 +0000 UTC]
this is completely
(non)sensical.
the pen inbetween
the letters is
sweet!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hamrick In reply to NickTassone [2005-12-04 22:28:47 +0000 UTC]
Oh, it makes perfect sense!
And thanks thanks thanks, also.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ikhon [2005-11-09 17:00:31 +0000 UTC]
i feel really bad that i havent seen this before, and even worse because i havent commented and displayed my utter fascination for the strength of composition shown.
seeeeriously, dude.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hamrick In reply to ikhon [2005-11-10 00:47:53 +0000 UTC]
I feel really bad that it's in a book full of bad art.
Thanks a lot man.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
himnofeda [2005-10-26 08:09:48 +0000 UTC]
i really like waht you did with typography here.
i hate chemistry!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hamrick In reply to himnofeda [2005-10-27 00:06:21 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I love that stencil. Chemistry was a strange class for me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
himnofeda In reply to Hamrick [2005-10-27 22:49:18 +0000 UTC]
for all, i think...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hamrick In reply to himnofeda [2005-10-27 23:01:36 +0000 UTC]
Hahah, a good observation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tigerfood [2005-10-25 17:58:45 +0000 UTC]
oh oh very nice
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hamrick In reply to tigerfood [2005-10-26 02:37:20 +0000 UTC]
Thanks very much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gregoriousone [2005-10-24 04:08:08 +0000 UTC]
leave the chemistry to the scientists!
what a much better and more aesthetically pleasing use of this book.
the typographical elements you drew are quite captivating.
well done!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hamrick In reply to gregoriousone [2005-10-24 04:38:36 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! I really am enjoying this new stencil I picked up a few weeks ago. I've never had one before, so it's kind of like "timetodoeverythingi'vealwayswantedtodowithastencil" time.
And yes, I believe the book is much better off with a fine coat of art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gregoriousone In reply to Hamrick [2005-10-24 06:20:06 +0000 UTC]
Letter stencils can be great fun. beats having to render type by hand (thinks back to those days spent at school hand lettering type for my intro to typography prof).
(forgot to mention this earlier, thanks for mentioning the smell of still wet gesso. yumm. I recently found an old stash of oil paints. loverly smelly linseed oil).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hamrick In reply to gregoriousone [2005-10-24 22:13:54 +0000 UTC]
Hahah. Even when a product smells terribly, if us artists like it enough the stench can be absolutely wonderful to the nostrils.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hexocain [2005-10-23 13:31:43 +0000 UTC]
Bayootiful! In a way, I think it represents deconstruction very well, because I don't see your art having anything to do with the book, just like deconstruction seems to run over the content of any text. That's not to say that I don't like the detachment here. The title 'visualized chemistry' is begging for it, too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hamrick In reply to hexocain [2005-10-23 17:45:11 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, a lot of comments I've gotten about the book pages, both in the book and in pieces seperate from it try to draw a connection to the text, but there really isn't one. I picked up the book because it had interesting diagrams, and the pages just seemed perfect.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hexocain In reply to Hamrick [2005-10-24 07:45:01 +0000 UTC]
Chemistry is always fun to mess with. C:
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ThatGuyOnTheStreet [2005-10-23 06:49:57 +0000 UTC]
For some reason, the yellow totally makes it a fave.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
little-row-boat [2005-10-22 14:34:51 +0000 UTC]
THIS IS MY FAVORITE LITTLE ALEX
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hamrick In reply to little-row-boat [2005-10-22 15:56:43 +0000 UTC]
I LIKE IT LOTS, TOO.
Very graphic design-ish.
(thanks.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
penelopemoon [2005-10-22 14:03:14 +0000 UTC]
Very nice work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DickStarr [2005-10-22 04:06:38 +0000 UTC]
I really like this one! I think it's the best of the series so far. The yellows are GREAT!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hamrick In reply to DickStarr [2005-10-22 05:40:07 +0000 UTC]
Ah, thanks man! I appreciate that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
padayappa [2005-10-22 01:09:22 +0000 UTC]
I like the use of only yellow. I wihs I had the nitch for these things, but I don't. oh well good work
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hamrick In reply to padayappa [2005-10-22 02:14:24 +0000 UTC]
Oh, you could pull off something like this no problem.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
stupidvagina [2005-10-21 17:13:09 +0000 UTC]
very cool
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
violetlove [2005-10-21 14:43:56 +0000 UTC]
neat!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fredfree [2005-10-21 13:53:53 +0000 UTC]
real nice, but what's the percent of water in crystalized copper sulfate?!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hamrick In reply to fredfree [2005-10-22 02:13:21 +0000 UTC]
Pff, 36.06% of course!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wilder3 [2005-10-21 05:27:55 +0000 UTC]
Very up and positive about itself "stitching".
Nice addition for the book.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hamrick In reply to wilder3 [2005-10-21 05:37:29 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, thank you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0