HOME | DD

Gonzale β€” holidays and ilford film.

Published: 2005-02-08 17:50:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 1509; Favourites: 33; Downloads: 314
Redirect to original
Description my cousins, easter holidays 2004, canon reflex.

oh and color film. it wasn't that easy to devellop in black and white
developped myself.
Related content
Comments: 90

Gonzale In reply to ??? [2008-12-30 10:28:17 +0000 UTC]

it's the same but the specs weren't added. the color one was a print i got at a store right after it was developped. the b&w is a print i did in my school's lab (one of my firs prints) so i put the negs upside down without really knowing, and the negs had gotten dusty over time.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

phlezk In reply to Gonzale [2008-12-30 17:25:19 +0000 UTC]

interesting, because the color one has all the camera metadata/whatever, shutter speed, date taken, etc, ya know?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to phlezk [2008-12-30 20:15:54 +0000 UTC]

no, it' a photo of a photo, i didnt have a scanner yet, so i took a photo of the print.

check the other comments...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

phlezk In reply to Gonzale [2008-12-31 22:34:33 +0000 UTC]

ah!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FoogliZeldeen [2006-05-08 15:51:21 +0000 UTC]

Good for you! I answered my own question of the b&w version of the "shoulders" shot.

Well done! You chose your seconds very well. Hmmm....except the shoulders one is flipped I noticed. I have never developed colour film myself, I've only done b&w before. Which is more difficult?

Love, Maddie.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to FoogliZeldeen [2006-05-08 16:58:29 +0000 UTC]

when you have to develop color, you have to be in complete dark.. so it's more difficult.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FoogliZeldeen In reply to Gonzale [2006-05-14 15:54:27 +0000 UTC]

Oh wow.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bastiancontrario [2006-02-08 20:17:59 +0000 UTC]

amazing

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GalletaFontaneda [2006-01-27 16:24:57 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mgood [2005-08-30 08:30:49 +0000 UTC]

lovely sequence

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

pinkflaming0s [2005-08-17 05:12:34 +0000 UTC]

Awwwrh. Thats is adorable.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to pinkflaming0s [2005-08-19 10:57:43 +0000 UTC]

thank youu

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lupius [2005-08-10 21:35:46 +0000 UTC]

Wow this is really touching.

This makes me wish I spend more time with my neice and nephues.

The two top shots are swamped with joy with like a playful sense. Yet the two of the girl seems to me that she's more reflective and shy but she has a deep and beautiful sense of wonder to her.

You've captured these shots beautiful...and it definetly strikes a sentimental chord for me.

It's amazing too that you've developed these yourself! This is something that i'd like to achieve...to be able to take pictures on film and then develop them myself...could you please share with me how you do it? Like what equipment do you use and is it costly?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to Lupius [2005-08-11 09:00:48 +0000 UTC]

i used the equipment of the school i was in, i have no idea of the cost... but i'm going to invest in a darkroom equipment next year maybe... and the development process is too complicated to explain for a french girl

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

zigazigah [2005-06-05 09:33:08 +0000 UTC]

love this piece! i can't say nothing that hasn't been said,but just wanna let you know that it's gorgeous

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nirvanadancer [2005-06-02 15:39:23 +0000 UTC]

cute candids of children
they look so real
like you have just captured their spirit on film
gorgeous work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sanchaise [2005-05-07 14:32:02 +0000 UTC]

ces photos sont vraiment excellentes!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fingercoldwrists [2005-05-06 17:45:23 +0000 UTC]

*sally mann

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fingercoldwrists [2005-05-06 17:44:46 +0000 UTC]

very distinct of sally man's portraits

brilliant stuff

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

S-H-M-I-L-Y [2005-04-27 19:23:15 +0000 UTC]

natural and innocent

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

S-H-M-I-L-Y [2005-04-27 19:23:10 +0000 UTC]

natural and innocent

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

flowersforcaligula [2005-04-18 08:24:51 +0000 UTC]

pretty french small ones.
my kids better be european.
even though i don't really want any.

i like the zig-zaggy vertical composition, and the actual photos themselves are beautiful. i think this edit is much better than the original because everything really ties with each other. on the whole, great captures of that strange wild-eyed THING many children have. i especially like the last two, not to undermine the cool-ness of the first though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FigoTheCat [2005-04-18 04:23:43 +0000 UTC]

damn, i love the scratches

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

beautifulyaddicted [2005-04-17 14:24:21 +0000 UTC]

jadore!
je trouve sa regarde meme plus bien avec les petites touches de poussieres etc

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

wellhahaha [2005-04-17 11:43:03 +0000 UTC]

i also use ilford

great work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

eternitty [2005-04-17 11:06:43 +0000 UTC]

fantastic...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ankooo [2005-04-17 10:38:51 +0000 UTC]

Très jolies photos! J'aime particulièrement la dernière, je la trouve bien réussie
Sont tout "moignons" XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to Ankooo [2005-04-17 10:40:52 +0000 UTC]

moignons hahaha je l'avais jamais entendue celle lΓ 
merci

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

McCanon [2005-04-17 06:09:27 +0000 UTC]

Interesting and original. I love it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

eclipsed-mind [2005-04-17 04:21:25 +0000 UTC]

That first and fourth image - stunning you've captured memories - that's what photography should be about.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to eclipsed-mind [2005-04-17 07:10:26 +0000 UTC]

that's my way of thinking. always have my camera on me to be the witness of my (boring/but sometimes peculiar and beautiful/boring) life. my camera is making my "way of seeing things", myself in fact, survive, and will make it survive after my death. it's important for me to use my camera
aanyway i'm sick and half sleeping. haha.
merci for your support throughout the times and events (hehe) i deeply appreciate it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

eclipsed-mind In reply to Gonzale [2005-04-17 07:23:16 +0000 UTC]

I only wish I had the confidence to photograph everyday things. I take my camera everywhere with me, sometimes two or three, but I don't find it easy at all to photograph random people. Oh well, maybe it'll come.
You're very welcome, I always love seeing your work in my devwatch

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

cellointhbasemnt [2005-04-17 03:52:46 +0000 UTC]

Oh and I want to make it clear that the reason that I don't like the cat photo isn't because it doesn't relate to children and innocence, themes are overrated anyway.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to cellointhbasemnt [2005-04-17 07:05:14 +0000 UTC]

i hesitated a lot for the cat one. and i still have the feeling it's not part of the series. oh well, i'll remove it today, you're not the first person who says that, me included.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

cellointhbasemnt [2005-04-17 03:41:47 +0000 UTC]

The top four out of the five prove that you are a very talented photographer. I don't like the last one, but who cares? Four out of five is good. Perfection is dead anyway. What I'm trying to say is, this is really great.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

terriblemar [2005-04-16 23:53:21 +0000 UTC]

results are pretty good... what ilford film did you use?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to terriblemar [2005-04-16 23:57:48 +0000 UTC]

200 asa, color.
a pain in the ass to develop in black and white.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

terriblemar In reply to Gonzale [2005-04-17 00:02:25 +0000 UTC]

oh was it? did you do it yourself?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to terriblemar [2005-04-17 00:24:09 +0000 UTC]

yes yes.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

past-equinox [2005-04-16 23:07:57 +0000 UTC]

Really wonderful, the photos remind me of some Sally Mann photos

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bonebleached [2005-04-16 21:17:53 +0000 UTC]

These are beautiful. I think the second to last is my favorite.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ScarletSharlotte [2005-04-16 20:07:06 +0000 UTC]

Your little female cousin looks like bjork!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to ScarletSharlotte [2005-04-16 20:57:56 +0000 UTC]

yes

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Awi [2005-04-16 19:30:33 +0000 UTC]

those are wondful shots
the cat threw me off a little
but you really captured the children so well, innocence and humor and wisdom mixed together

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

thesouthernrange [2005-04-16 18:41:54 +0000 UTC]

beautiful pictures, friend.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vallendester [2005-04-16 18:40:36 +0000 UTC]

cute love the sec pic. the eyes are beautiful!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Belzebuth [2005-04-16 18:37:48 +0000 UTC]

ah donc tu travail a l'argentique ? j'aime que les argentique je crois

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to Belzebuth [2005-04-16 18:42:07 +0000 UTC]

tu crois?
oui ça m'est arrivé, mais avec ceux de mon ecole. je pense que mon père va me donenr le sien, il ne s'en sert plus.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Belzebuth In reply to Gonzale [2005-04-16 18:47:46 +0000 UTC]

oooh quel dommage d'utiliser le numerique... bien sur c'est la facilitΓ© et c plus rapide, et moins chere, (lol Γ§a fait dΓ©jΓ  plein d'avantages) mais Γ§a a moins de charme

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to Belzebuth [2005-04-16 18:59:33 +0000 UTC]

hmm....
je sais pas franchement. ces photos sont les seules argentiques que j'ai... dans ma galerie en tous cas
il peut y avoir des photos argentiques nulles et des photos numeriques magnifique.. je sais pas.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2


| Next =>