HOME | DD

Franoys — Tyrannosaurus rex skeletal diagram (AMNH 5027)

#anatomy #bones #carnivorous #diagram #dinosaur #dinosauria #drawing #giant #paleontology #predatory #reconstruction #restoration #rex #scaling #schematic #skeletal #skeleton #theropoda #tyrannosaurid #tyrannosauroid #tyrannosaurus #osteology #tyrannosauridae #coelurosauria #paleozoology #tetanurae #tyrannosauroidea #paleobiology #tyrannoraptora
Published: 2018-08-28 07:07:56 +0000 UTC; Views: 36458; Favourites: 274; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Another Tyrannosaurus rex adult specimen, and the last one I'm going to make for a really long time (if not ever),since the rest are extremely poorly reported in the literature (so don't ask for more specimens, I beg you!)

AMNH 5027 is the archetypical Tyrannosaurus, as the looks of the animal (including the head the torso and the tail) have been based on this specimen for almost a century,until other specimens have been found and reconstructed, or described. Every media portrayal of the dinosaur, like King Kong, or Jurassic Park, are mainly based on this specimen. The malformation in the back at dorsal7/8 has made it so most representations of the animal are humpy, something that seems to be a characteristic of this single specimen (it has been mostly corrected for this restoration, which also made the torso change in shape and size a bit; the measurement of the cervical and dorsal column length changes from 314,4 cm as referenced in Brown 1923 to 327,9 cm).

The big uncertainly on the size of the tail has led to much debate and different interpretations, the original reconstruction of the animal as ilustrated in Osborn 1917 was 13.4 m long, with the missing caudals restored very big, and with 53 of them. In 1988, Paul proposed the tail length of the mount was inmensely exaggerated and reconstructed the missing elements after a juvenile Gorgosaurus, arriving to 37 caudals and re arranging the positions of the known caudals,which yielded a length of 10.7 m with a tail less than half of the body length, which is like the animal is portrayed on films like Jurassic park, giving it a very compact look. Now the finding of more complete specimens like FMNH PR 2081 and BHI 3033 allow us to know that it is imposible that Tyrannosaurus had only 37 caudals and allow us to arrange the few posterior caudals and restore the size of the missing portions correctly, arriving to something in the middle of what the original reconstruction and Paul suggested (almost 12 m in length).

The specimen is exhibited at the saurischian hall in the American Museum of Natural history. It was originally posed in a raised posture reaching 5.35 m tall to the head, dragging it's tail, and with three functional fingers on each hand. The 5-6 m height figures for Tyrannosaurus are based on the skeletons posed in this manner, as in a regular posture it is not posible for the animal to reach this height. Posterior fidings have confirmed the animal only had two functional fingers and not three, althouth it did have a vestigial metacarpal lll. The specimen as mounted still has the exaggerated tail, and is therefore still the longest carnivorous dinosaur mount that includes real remains in the world, even if it is not the largest specimen when one compares the preserved material with the corresponding of the others. The legs in the mounted skeleton are casts of the holotype specimen, and the feet and hands are completely sculpted and not directly based on any Tyrannosaurus rex specimen because they were still unknown when the mount was updated; in fact, the feet are scaled up Allosaurus feet.

References:

H.F. Osborn (1905) TYRANNOSAURUS AND OTHER CRETACEOUS CARNIVOROUS DINOSAURS. Bulletin American Museum of Natural History. Vol XXl.

H.F.Osborn (1912) Crania of Tyrannosaurus and Allosaurus. Memoirs American Museum of Natural History. N.S Vol l Part l.

H.F.Osborn (1917)Article XLIII. SKELETAL ADAPTATIONS OF ORNITHOLESTES, STRUTHIOMIMUS, TYRANNOSAURUS. Bulletin American Museum of Natural History. Vol. XXXV.

Matthew, W. D., & Brown, B. (1923). Preliminary notices of skeletons and skulls of Deinodontidae from the Cretaceous of Alberta. American Museum novitates; no. 89.

Paul GS. 1988b. Predatory dinosaurs of the world: a complete illustrated guide. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Christopher A. Brochu (2003): Osteology of Tyrannosaurus Rex: Insights from a nearly complete Skeleton and High-Resolution Computed Tomographic Analysis of the Skull, Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 22:sup4, 1-138

Tyrannosaurus rex the Tyrant king (2008) ISBN: 978-0-253-35087-9. (Larson, Carpenter, Paul, Horner, 2008).


Related content
Comments: 57

Nadrax3343 [2019-03-28 19:29:48 +0000 UTC]

I love how detailed your drawings are. Scott Hartman and Greg Paul's drawings are still great, but the level of detail in your drawings is incredible. It really shows the three-dimensional morphology of each bone.

👍: 2 ⏩: 0

grisador [2018-11-02 18:12:07 +0000 UTC]

So, No 17m Tyrannosaurus ?

(Joke, Neat work as usual )

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

Jdangerousdinosaur In reply to grisador [2018-11-07 02:19:41 +0000 UTC]

why would there ever be a 17 meter long Tyrannosaurus ? there is no evidence that suggests any theropod that we know off reaching 17 meters long.

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

grisador In reply to Jdangerousdinosaur [2019-07-09 15:07:33 +0000 UTC]

Its a speculation/joke that the many 'commentators' of youTube came to be... they all on the idea of tyrannosaurus grows forever and one reached that size

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

Veldthunter In reply to grisador [2019-07-22 08:03:42 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

grisador In reply to Veldthunter [2019-11-05 16:35:04 +0000 UTC]

I disagree...

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

RAITHEHOTDOG In reply to Jdangerousdinosaur [2018-12-23 15:47:26 +0000 UTC]

Jdangerousdinosaur r/woosh

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jdangerousdinosaur In reply to RAITHEHOTDOG [2018-12-23 19:43:19 +0000 UTC]

Joke or not trust me going of what he posts on stuff such as youtube he needs to to be told.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RAITHEHOTDOG In reply to Jdangerousdinosaur [2018-12-24 05:06:20 +0000 UTC]

Hm good point

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pootisman90 In reply to Jdangerousdinosaur [2018-11-12 07:58:26 +0000 UTC]

The Spinosaurus could, but he was a fish eater mostly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jdangerousdinosaur In reply to Pootisman90 [2018-11-12 15:16:15 +0000 UTC]

but we have no evidence to show Spinosaurus growing to 17 meters the largest one is estimated to be 15 meters long and around 6876 kgs. The rest of the specimens are smaller than this unless you have a link to any evidence to suggest otherwise ? here is my evidence to back up what im saying qr.ae/TUhKst . Im not saying Spinosaurus could not grow to 17 meters and im not saying Tyrannosaurus could not grow larger than 12.3 meters but right now there is no evidence to suggest any theropod growing to 17 meters long.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

grisador In reply to Jdangerousdinosaur [2019-07-09 15:07:51 +0000 UTC]

15.6 meters however

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

Jdangerousdinosaur In reply to grisador [2019-07-10 21:08:52 +0000 UTC]

Is still not 17 meters long ...but im glad you have finally used to 15.6 meters long estimate that we actually have some evidence for and not just cherry picking over estimates and out of date information like you have done in the past that is progress.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

grisador In reply to Jdangerousdinosaur [2019-07-12 11:06:59 +0000 UTC]

By past; on 2014/16 it was pretty much a valid argument; I am aware that the oldest publication could get old; its that.
I wouldn't call it anything at all; by cherypicking; everyone is guilty of that; I still remember how everyone obediently jump up onto entirely quadrupedal and entirely aquatic spinosaurus band wagoon like it is golden(!)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JES86 [2018-09-17 16:25:26 +0000 UTC]

'Every media portrayal of the dinosaur, like King Kong, or Jurassic Park, are mainly based on this specimen.'

Very small quibble - the King Kong Rex was based on the earlier Charles R. Knight - the one based on the type specimen - CM 9380 - where the eye was placed too far forward on the skull.  'Gwangi' was based on this same painting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pootisman90 In reply to JES86 [2018-11-12 07:59:19 +0000 UTC]

And I'm pretty sure the V-Rex was based on the Giganotosaurus rather than the Rex because it had three claws and was huge, even if it's the descendant of the Rex.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Pendragon276 In reply to Pootisman90 [2019-05-04 14:39:47 +0000 UTC]

It wasn’t “based” on giganotosaurus at all it was just created to be a bigger, meaner more brutish version of Tyrannosaurus being its descendant on skull island. It’s a speculative evolutionary take basically. Of course it’s going to be huge...gigantism is kindve the point here. The three fingers were probably an aesthetic touch or one to pay slight homage to the dinosaur Kong fought in the original 1933 film. Still the design process of the V.rex had nothing to do with giganotosaurus wikizilla.org/wiki/Vastatosaur…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JES86 In reply to Pootisman90 [2018-11-12 15:56:45 +0000 UTC]

That's because the Knight painting ALSO gave T. rex three fingers - which is why the original Kong rex and Gwangi also had three fingers. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pootisman90 In reply to JES86 [2018-11-12 18:02:18 +0000 UTC]

Gwangi was actually an Allosaurus though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JES86 In reply to Pootisman90 [2018-11-12 19:02:58 +0000 UTC]

Gwangi was described in O'Brien's original script as an Allosaurus, because O'Brien apparently didn't draw much distinction between Allosaurus and  T. rex, as he also referred to the Tyrannosaurus in the original King Kong (modeled by Marcel Delgado) as an "Allosaurus".

According to Ray Harryhausen, in an interview on the 'Valley of Gwangi' DVD, as well as his book An Animated Life, his own version of Gwangi (and O'Brien's Gwangi too, as well as Delgado's King Kong Tyrannosaurus) was based on a Charles R. Knight painting of a Tyrannosaurus - and all you really have to do is look at it, because Gwangi is nearly an exact reproduction, scale for scale.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pootisman90 In reply to JES86 [2018-11-12 20:49:23 +0000 UTC]

Pre-eighties dinosaurs were badly portrayed. Thank God for Jurassic Park and Carnosaur!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pendragon276 In reply to Pootisman90 [2019-05-04 14:41:50 +0000 UTC]

I personally wouldn’t say they were “badly” portrayed especially not for their time but thats just me we’ve certainly come a considerably long way in our understanding which is a relief.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

anomally [2018-09-01 14:07:44 +0000 UTC]

Amazing looking restoration as usual! This definitely gives me a strong vibe of Rexy from Jurassic Park just by quickly glancing over it. Something about this specimen just looks so graceful and well proportioned if you will. 
Also sad to hear you're not onto rexes any more, hope one day you'll find enough data on Trix, Scotty and Rigby's Rex so we can see them in their true light.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Franoys In reply to anomally [2018-09-01 19:39:30 +0000 UTC]

I am afraid I wouldn't be able to find said data unless they get described in detail or I got to see them in person;they are still definately not a priority however seeing how I made several specimens alredy (and I have much work to do on other taxa). A friend of mine did a drawing of Scotty recently: Tyrannosaurus rex skeletal reconstructions. I agree on the part about AMNH 5027 aesthetics, it is a beautifully preserved fossil. And thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

anomally In reply to Franoys [2018-09-03 03:53:36 +0000 UTC]

Looking forward to see your new taxa then , maybe some giant crocodilians too? Also saw Randomdino's Scotty, was beautiful as well. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jdangerousdinosaur [2018-09-01 00:11:16 +0000 UTC]

as always beautiful work bro

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Franoys In reply to Jdangerousdinosaur [2018-09-01 19:33:58 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much, means a lot

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Spinolover2017 [2018-08-31 22:20:21 +0000 UTC]

Booh trex gay booh

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Franoys In reply to Spinolover2017 [2018-09-01 19:32:59 +0000 UTC]

Does that mean you have anything against gay dinosaurs?  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Spinolover2017 In reply to Franoys [2018-09-07 12:12:36 +0000 UTC]

no and yes and no

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dinosapien [2018-08-29 16:53:18 +0000 UTC]

This is quite honestly the most stunningly detailed reconstruction I've ever seen.  I've seen your work before but the amount of tiny details you incorporated into the individual bones is beautiful.  How have I not devWATCHed you?  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Franoys In reply to dinosapien [2018-09-01 19:34:48 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much. I am glad you are following now!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dinosapien In reply to Franoys [2018-09-01 22:55:56 +0000 UTC]

Np bro  

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sketchy-raptor [2018-08-29 13:23:29 +0000 UTC]

Awesome job illustrating those cranial epidermal correlates. The level of precise detail on this skeletal reconstruction is superb.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Franoys In reply to Sketchy-raptor [2018-08-29 14:09:29 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much! Too bad Deviantart doesn't allow me to upload theese in higher resolution with a watermark. I guess I could add the watermark myself in the future to counter this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bac0nm0rph [2018-08-29 09:41:40 +0000 UTC]

yaint

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AlternatePrehistory In reply to Bac0nm0rph [2018-08-29 09:48:28 +0000 UTC]

chandler no one cares about your existence, you don't contribute anything to society because your a loser who sits at home all day playing doom on their shit laptop. just accept the fact that no one loves you and you will not progress in life starting from this point. id rather be who i am than a talentless loser who makes low quality jokes in an attempt to be funni and relevant in todays society. just move on and stop messaging me every morning cus you know ur just wasting your life. also hi

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bac0nm0rph In reply to AlternatePrehistory [2018-08-29 09:50:14 +0000 UTC]

Dad?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AlternatePrehistory In reply to Bac0nm0rph [2018-08-29 09:52:22 +0000 UTC]

S...son? My boy! You're alive!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bac0nm0rph In reply to AlternatePrehistory [2018-08-29 09:53:50 +0000 UTC]

Dad its been years, hows mother? Did her leg heal? Did sister come back from the war? Is Uncle Funk still a beach bum?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AlternatePrehistory In reply to Bac0nm0rph [2018-08-29 09:57:43 +0000 UTC]

Whoa, Dudes! My name's Funky Kong! My bodacious Jumbo Barrel can launch you to any point on the island!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bac0nm0rph In reply to AlternatePrehistory [2018-08-29 09:58:44 +0000 UTC]

Interplanetary visitor dudes

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

christina1969 [2018-08-29 06:59:02 +0000 UTC]

Not even Trix, Scotty, Samson or Tristan?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

105697 [2018-08-29 01:57:13 +0000 UTC]

Nice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Franoys In reply to 105697 [2018-08-29 07:45:42 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rhe416 [2018-08-29 01:35:44 +0000 UTC]

If you make Tristan I will die in happiness

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JES86 [2018-08-28 19:41:16 +0000 UTC]

'Rexy'  THE face of T. rex for almost a hundred years... AND starring in Jurassic Park.

Excellent work.

Question - I realize the mount has CM 9380's legs, but as I understand it, 5027 is considered a 'gracile' specimen as opposed to the 'robust' 9380 - what about giving it the legs of another gracile individual - Peck's Rex, maybe - or Stan?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Franoys In reply to JES86 [2018-08-29 04:04:07 +0000 UTC]

Hi, as far as I can tell AMNH 5027 can't be plotted as gracile or robust precissely because it lacks limbs, so it can't be included in the plot of long bone circumference against long bone longitude. CM 9380 has very similarly sized pelvic elements and is from the same horizon in the Hell Creek formation, as well as from the same ontogenic stage (22 years old vs 21 of AMNH 5027 going by Erickson 2006), therefore it seemed suitable to use, Stan died younger (18 yo) and was found close to the K-pg limit, so it is about 2 million years younger geologically than CM 9380 and AMNH 5027.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JES86 In reply to Franoys [2018-08-29 15:04:49 +0000 UTC]

As I understand it limb-length was only one of the measuring points - in fact, to my eye, it seems somewhat less reliable, as many of the smaller (i.e shorter) specimens fall towards the 'robust' end of the graph in limbs  (shorter animals have shorter thighs), but not necessarily in other measures.  Super-robust 'Sue' is sort of right in the middle.

I'm wondering if some of the large 'gracile' specimens aren't simply the equivalent of a teen-ager, whose legs will appear gangly after their maturity growth spurt, and then filling out as they grow into full mature adults.

Anyway, just thinking out loud.  Great work.

BTW, while I'm disappointed you're putting T. rex aside for a while, Rexy is far from the ONLY cool dinosaur out there - I think your carnosaurs are great - and while this is science-based art, it's still 'art' and you've got to follow your muse - as in do stuff that keeps you interested.

I look forward to seeing what you put out down the line.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Strick67 [2018-08-28 18:52:45 +0000 UTC]

Good work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>