Comments: 36
punk-meow [2009-03-19 22:34:48 +0000 UTC]
AAH I love it! The dog is so cute!~
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ebubba [2007-06-21 23:48:02 +0000 UTC]
Simply amazing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kamose [2007-04-24 19:07:29 +0000 UTC]
You're one of the best true ASCII artists on deviantART. It's nice to see some greyscale work that doesn't look as if it were run through one of those ASCII filters.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
diamondie In reply to Kamose [2007-04-25 08:00:39 +0000 UTC]
Thanks a lot for those compliments. Personally I don't think I'm that good at grayscale, eg. ~jSepia and `nemoorange are much better, and their works don't look like conversions either. But I've drawn hundreds of lineart and solid pieces and only a handful of grayscale ones, so maybe I should practice it again.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Larah88 [2007-02-01 06:54:25 +0000 UTC]
This is really good!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
juansrx [2006-08-18 16:45:39 +0000 UTC]
I`ve seen other dwawings with such detail, like one of mr Spock.
Are those yours too??
Very good detailed!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
diamondie In reply to juansrx [2006-08-22 13:02:58 +0000 UTC]
No, this is the first real "grayscale" ASCII picture I've drawn. I'm not nearly as good at it as many other people are, eg. ~jSepia and `nemoorange , but I'm hoping to draw some more grayscale in the future.
Thanks for the comments!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gymnart [2006-01-15 05:05:23 +0000 UTC]
This looks really cool. Nice work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AOENIAC [2005-12-24 20:08:59 +0000 UTC]
I like greyscales and pugs, win win for this picture!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
goldenCHERRIES [2005-12-07 04:14:25 +0000 UTC]
its funny how ASCI looks better in the preview.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lemango [2005-11-30 19:26:48 +0000 UTC]
wow, thats too cool, i cant imagine even being able to THINK of how to do this, you should be proud of yourself!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
michelln [2005-10-31 10:20:18 +0000 UTC]
This is impressive work! It amazes me how you can arrange these symbols to create shadow and light. It must take a lot of patience and practice to get a result like this. Not to mention the talent to see "where" to place "what" symbol to create the desired effect. Looks like a giant puzzle from my point of view, but with an impressive end result.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Enyahs [2005-10-23 04:54:42 +0000 UTC]
Thats bloody kool, how do you do that?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
diamondie In reply to Enyahs [2005-10-23 11:09:46 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. I use the program JavE , but you could as well use a normal text editor like Notepad. I found a good stock photo from stock.xchng , upped the contrast in PSP and used it as a reference photo. The use of different characters for different shades was largely experimental, as I've concentrated on different kinds of ASCII art before.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
diamondie In reply to jSepia [2005-10-24 17:19:14 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. I don't think it was too hard to shade in Fixedsys, it offers a wide variety of contrast unlike some fonts. I settled for the + because no other character gave me satisfactory results, colons just didn't cut it. I wanted the characters to fit together and + seemed to go well with the x due to their similar shapes.
I didn't really think of this picture as "hi-res", it wasn't intentional. But it's true that the picture looks very good in thumbnail size or slightly bigger, but I don't like the full resolution that much, which is somewhat of a shame since I tend to think one should view ASCII art with the individual characters visible.
My next ASCII will probably be just a logo request. I don't have any idea what will come after that, though I think I'll be continuing with grayscale some time in the near future.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
soozn [2005-10-21 22:54:12 +0000 UTC]
wow! excellent diamondie. i really like how you have used $ S s and X x +, kind of a subtle way to define shading without making it too noticable. your anti-aliasing couldnt be more perfect!
great work
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shurakai-Zero [2005-10-20 10:16:05 +0000 UTC]
While the contrast is rather low, I suspect it's symptomatic of the medium. In any given mono-spaced font, there's going to be a certain amount of space not just around each character, but within as well. I doubt you could get much more than a 50% dot (to use a printing analogy) so you'd either have to intentionally over-contrast the image or, as you've mentioned, find something with that level of contrast inherent in it. Over-contrasting would be difficult to do without producing banding, especially if your source image is fairly flat to begin with, as this appears to be. Given the technical difficulties involved, I think you've managed quite a good piece.
As usual, your anti-aliasing is impeccable, and you've even managed to create what appears to be a slightly feathered edge along the left side, where the dog is backlit. The only part that stands out as being not quite right is the little fold of skin just under the muzzle on the right. Somehow the edge seems a bit too pronounced. Maybe the final : could be replaced with a . to soften it a touch? Caveat: I'm no ascii artist, so you're free to tell me to fuck off and keep my opinions to myself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
diamondie In reply to Shurakai-Zero [2005-10-21 13:00:48 +0000 UTC]
Well, it's possible to create grayscale ASCII art with very high contrast, as you can always use empty spaces and very light characters, such as punctuation characters. But this is hard to do if the subject in question isn't already high in contrast or possible to turn into a high-contrast image without looking silly. Faces often look good in high-contrast, but you just can't get a dog to look the same way. Dalmatians are a different thing, but due to the lack of gradients they're probably more suitable for solid ASCII than grayscale. That said, I'll try to draw a Dalmatian some day.
The feathered edge wasn't intentional, but now that you mention it I can see it that way. The fold of the skin was originally wider (the way it was in my reference photo), but I thought it looked exaggerated and removed the right-most character.
Your opinions and those things you've pointed out are certainly insightful and make a lot of sense. It's always good to hear some thoughts "outside of the genre".
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ravens-Eye-Studio [2005-10-19 23:22:41 +0000 UTC]
SHEESH! i can't imagine how long it must have taken you to figure all of that out. It is really cute!!
And the dog is a cutie too.....Wow...impressive work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kittehkisses [2005-10-19 23:18:04 +0000 UTC]
these things give me the most horrible headaches to look at xD thats a lot of work though oO;
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
undertoe [2005-10-19 21:23:45 +0000 UTC]
Outstanding!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jerm123321 [2005-10-19 21:21:47 +0000 UTC]
Amazing! In low resolution it looks just like a black and white photograph.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
audiosyncracy [2005-10-19 16:12:04 +0000 UTC]
OMG... I love it!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Laachesis [2005-10-19 13:58:27 +0000 UTC]
I enjoy this, too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0