Comments: 39
takitus [2004-07-06 01:17:25 +0000 UTC]
the depth of field and color are awesome in this photo. i think its the best in your gallery.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sanozatsho [2004-07-02 02:54:24 +0000 UTC]
oh yeah baby, you know how to turn me on! awesome composure and colors. the red is perfectly dominat over the black. roses with a black back is always a winner.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Laughalotcrazy [2004-06-21 13:30:40 +0000 UTC]
Hmm Photoshop... I love that program...
Anyways... Another great rose capture. I like the vibrantness of the rose and the way the roses in the background blur out...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
f4ever [2004-06-19 02:25:23 +0000 UTC]
I love this one ^_^'. The focus is brilliant and the fading really works well in this one.
Honestly, I think that sepia toning it would ruin it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
csharpmajor [2004-05-26 04:34:52 +0000 UTC]
Colour! Keep it in colour! The colour is great, why would you want to ditch it?
Hmm, I think you should ahve zoomed in more on the front rose. Were you trying to have a trail of roses behind? Well you can keep the trail if you want...but the front rose right now is the same size as the others, and the other roses also have really vibrant colours, so there's not much to make it stand out. I think you could also improve the picture by making the line of roses more strongly diagonal, ie move your camera so the front rose is in the lower left corner, and the very back one is in the upper right. All this is hypothetical of course, since this is an old photo. But it's always good to see how you can improve a photo since it means you'll do better next time. You should probably have used a shorter depth of field too, sicne like I said the colours are really strong in ALL the roses. If the ones in the back were more blurred then it would put more focus on the front rose. This is expecially important for the rose right behind the front one, since they kind of blend into each other and look like a gigantic mutant twinhead thing. But it's really nice right now too, the red goes really well with the green. Um. You should probably keep it in colour, the red is one of the best things about this picture.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DawnFire84 In reply to csharpmajor [2004-06-01 04:41:42 +0000 UTC]
sorry I'm so late in replying, but thank you very much for your detailed comment! I'll definitely take your advice for the future. I really appreciate it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vcrimson [2004-05-20 11:12:09 +0000 UTC]
you shouldn't apologise....these images are really fantastic. this one, i think is my favourite of the roses...it is just breath taking...i really don't know how you've managed to get such rich colour...and the lighting and shallow depth of field...well it's just perfect!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DawnFire84 In reply to vcrimson [2004-05-20 16:40:55 +0000 UTC]
thank you so much! I'm glad you liked it! I owe how well the color showed up to those beautiful roses, they were so rich in color to begin with! Thanks so much for your comment and for the fav!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vcrimson In reply to DawnFire84 [2004-05-21 08:50:33 +0000 UTC]
you're welcome!!! they really were fantastic!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DawnFire84 In reply to taoge [2004-05-20 16:34:25 +0000 UTC]
thank you, I'm glad you like it! Thanks for the fav too!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SiempreYo [2004-05-19 01:51:37 +0000 UTC]
these roses are so beautiful! nice work catching these!! i really like them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AgentTuna [2004-05-18 14:49:57 +0000 UTC]
yeah no problem
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nsbell [2004-05-18 09:16:28 +0000 UTC]
this is simply beautiful - i dont know how else to describe it. the soft colours and perfect lighting lend a very romantic ambience to this piece, and, as a hopelessly quixotic person myself - it really appeals to me. I especially love the way the large bloom is the focus of the shot, but the other blooms behind it kind of lead your eye to it. im no photographer, hence the untechnical terms, but my lack of understanding doesnt dull my sense of appreciation. this is a definite favourite, very aesthetically pleasing. beautiful, in a word
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DawnFire84 In reply to AgentTuna [2004-05-18 14:45:56 +0000 UTC]
heh, why thank you! Actually the roses were really cheap! It was only $5 for all of them! I just couldn't pass up the deal. Thanks for your comment and for the fav!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
art-shmart [2004-05-18 02:35:57 +0000 UTC]
i'm quite partial to the intense red, myself. it really shows the nature of the rose. gorgeous photography.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
art-shmart In reply to DawnFire84 [2004-05-18 02:42:18 +0000 UTC]
it's amazing that it came out that beautiful without alteration. you definitely have a good eye for beauty.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DawnFire84 In reply to art-shmart [2004-05-18 02:47:06 +0000 UTC]
aw, well thanks! But hey, it's easy when you have something beautiful like roses to work with. I think the reason the color stands out so much is also due to the fact that these roses were the most amazing deep shade of red that I have ever seen. They were only $5 too, so I just had to buy them!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wench-101 [2004-05-18 02:26:44 +0000 UTC]
that looks gorgeous
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DawnFire84 In reply to wench-101 [2004-05-18 02:33:05 +0000 UTC]
thanks! And thanks so much for the fav and the watch, I appreciate it greatly! :hugs:
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fee-clochette [2004-05-17 20:47:50 +0000 UTC]
lovely shot!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1