HOME | DD

danielnikolic β€” field bindweed detail 1 by-nc-sa

Published: 2008-06-10 09:06:06 +0000 UTC; Views: 275; Favourites: 17; Downloads: 3
Redirect to original
Description A detail of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis , divlji slak in Croatian) flower. It's a quite small flower, 1-2 cm in diameter.

I'm not very satisfied with quality of the photo
Related content
Comments: 18

Ronin-San [2008-06-12 15:17:07 +0000 UTC]

ah ne pričaj mi o kvaliteti...koliko sam odličnih makro slika propustio dosada...ali sve u svoje vreme.me like:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Whitepantheress [2008-06-11 01:33:55 +0000 UTC]

Is this halo-like affect at the flower edges caused by poor lighting, or is it an issue with the digital camera? Something else?



WP

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

danielnikolic In reply to Whitepantheress [2008-06-12 07:16:10 +0000 UTC]

It's a limitation of lenses, that is specially visible where are high-contrast transitions, see [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Whitepantheress In reply to danielnikolic [2008-06-12 11:17:23 +0000 UTC]

So reducing the appature(sp.) diameter and compensating for that with a longer exposure time should minimise this affect???

(after reading the linked artical)



WP

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

danielnikolic In reply to Whitepantheress [2008-06-12 12:34:50 +0000 UTC]

Likely, because it's depending on the lens, and if you decrease aperture you use a smaller lens area. If you take a look at EXIF data for the pic, you see the exposure is 1/320 s. I could go to manual settings, and go to 1/125 or like. But it's hard to see small aberrations on the built-in LCD, so I was under a false impression the photo was OK.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Whitepantheress In reply to danielnikolic [2008-06-13 00:32:07 +0000 UTC]

Could you now assume that in high contrast the cameras' computer is a little off and take the shutter speed down proactively in each situation like this?

Or is is a shot by shot thingy?

(Only picking your brain so I can try it with my camera, not telling you what you should do....I am learning heaps this way :-D )

WP

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

danielnikolic In reply to Whitepantheress [2008-06-13 07:02:37 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I could, but then I'll have to switch from automatic to manual.

I'll try

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Whitepantheress In reply to danielnikolic [2008-06-14 23:38:43 +0000 UTC]

Ahhhhhh...yes, I haven't poked at my manual settings either. Thanks for working me thru the hypotheticals of how to do that though

Now I know....

WP

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

danielnikolic In reply to Whitepantheress [2008-06-15 07:14:21 +0000 UTC]

No problem, you're welcome. Playing around with settings won't harm your camera and can be a lot of fun

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Citrakayah [2008-06-10 12:39:57 +0000 UTC]

Nije losa !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

danielnikolic In reply to Citrakayah [2008-06-10 12:52:06 +0000 UTC]

Malo ima Ε‘uma, i kromatske aberacije

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Citrakayah In reply to danielnikolic [2008-06-10 13:02:28 +0000 UTC]

XD ja nisam primjetio

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

danielnikolic In reply to Citrakayah [2008-06-10 13:23:36 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Aussie-Blonde [2008-06-10 09:07:24 +0000 UTC]

looks good to me

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

danielnikolic In reply to Aussie-Blonde [2008-06-10 09:11:49 +0000 UTC]

Zoom in and you'll see some color on the flower edge where it should not be. Also, note a lot of noise

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Aussie-Blonde In reply to danielnikolic [2008-06-10 09:18:07 +0000 UTC]

noise???? i can hear a thing but animal planet

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

danielnikolic In reply to Aussie-Blonde [2008-06-10 09:19:13 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Aussie-Blonde In reply to danielnikolic [2008-06-10 09:24:49 +0000 UTC]

well its very quiet here cat is sound asleep in her little pink bed i took her pic

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0