Comments: 4
zenitraMsj [2017-03-07 21:21:27 +0000 UTC]
This design might have worked. The problem with the German “Dragonfly” and the American “Pogo” was landing tail first and the pilot having to rely on mirrors or ground control. The cold war had some crazy ideas. Good work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Peebo-Thuhlu In reply to zenitraMsj [2017-03-17 08:47:53 +0000 UTC]
This is wht the Henschelle "Wespe"(?) design had the pilot prone wile in flight and 'standing' when landing/taking off.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
agricola64 [2017-03-07 21:04:45 +0000 UTC]
so on the ground he is basically standing in the control cabin ..
with his back to the fuselage? so he would have as large a field of view as possible for landing (that was always the weak points of the tailsitters)
the SRB's seem to be a bit of overkill - otoh this makes it a point defence interceptor with a phenomenal rate of climb (although a bit expenisive for training / regular operations
ii will see if i can finmd the article human g limits in different positions again
👍: 0 ⏩: 0