Comments: 9
loqutor [2011-07-07 22:51:52 +0000 UTC]
Links to the actual dispute (or maybe excerpts from it) would be a lot more helpful in emphasizing your point.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Cola82 In reply to loqutor [2011-07-08 04:30:09 +0000 UTC]
This wasn't the result of any one conflict. Or are you just being ironic?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
loqutor In reply to Cola82 [2011-07-08 04:36:08 +0000 UTC]
I'm talking about the exchange that you mention in the ACs from Pandagon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Cola82 In reply to loqutor [2011-07-08 04:44:43 +0000 UTC]
Ah, I see. Yeah, I thought that link went back to that article. I don't know what happened. But it really doesn't matter (I'm not going to go back and look for it, because I don't even remember what the article was about, and it would take a lot of time). It isn't necessary to know what the specific disagreement is to know that the phenomenon of arguing in bad faith exists. It's independent of political ideology; anyone can fall prey to it, and anyone can get caught up in arguing with someone who has. It's more of a function of self-centeredness and immaturity than anything. I may have been inspired to create the stamp after the specific exchange I describe, but I had a dozen or more of my own battles in the back of my mind while I made it.
Anyway, I see that you're a "Men's Rights Activist" who doesn't care much for third-wave feminism, which I imagine is probably the real source of your curiosity (given the nature of the blog). Trust me, it doesn't matter what the conflict was. If you want to watch Amanda Marcotte argue with trolls on her blog, you can do that any day of the week.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
loqutor In reply to Cola82 [2011-07-08 04:59:32 +0000 UTC]
I haven't seen much of that lately, actually. In fact, I have yet to see a single comment that so much as contradicts a thing she says. Most likely she blocks any and all dissenters.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Cola82 In reply to loqutor [2011-07-08 05:24:19 +0000 UTC]
Considering I was reading a series of disagreements in the comments of a recent post last night, I doubt that, but that's neither here nor there. You can host any kind of conversation you like on your own blog. I'm not interested in having a semantic argument about trolls.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
loqutor In reply to Cola82 [2011-07-08 05:29:43 +0000 UTC]
Okay, fair enough. I was getting off-topic, anyway; my original intent was to offer constructive criticism, nothing more.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
two-smokes [2010-08-28 04:08:35 +0000 UTC]
Bravo!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1