Comments: 20
captshade In reply to veronicafan [2009-05-23 17:55:35 +0000 UTC]
Glad you liked it...And it's always good to hear about a fellow Navy man.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Itsomi [2008-04-23 05:34:25 +0000 UTC]
cool ship! although it reminds me of the nebula class.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
captshade In reply to Itsomi [2008-04-23 05:41:03 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. It does a little bit. Though, to the best of my knowlage, the design was made before TNG. And there is a TOS design that's closer. And I'll probably get around to doing it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
davemetlesits [2008-04-22 12:36:52 +0000 UTC]
I really like this small, compact nacelle design.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
XRaiderV1 [2008-04-22 10:21:58 +0000 UTC]
unusual design, I like it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Roguewing [2008-04-22 00:04:02 +0000 UTC]
It's a design with potential....
Needs a few upgrades, though.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
captshade In reply to Roguewing [2008-04-22 00:37:50 +0000 UTC]
True...Though the Ranger Class never made it out of this stage...Though there are some fan artists that tried.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Roguewing In reply to captshade [2008-04-22 00:41:06 +0000 UTC]
May take a stab myself if I get an idea
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
captshade In reply to Roguewing [2008-04-22 01:39:42 +0000 UTC]
Go for it. Would love to see what you can do with her.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JamieTakahashi [2008-04-21 22:08:36 +0000 UTC]
I like how the bridge isn't on top for this one, I never did like that design rule.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JamieTakahashi In reply to captshade [2008-04-21 22:59:25 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, which I'm okay with. If it's not on top, it should be on the saucer. If it is on top, it can be anywhere. In my humble opinion at least.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
luka89 [2008-04-21 21:15:43 +0000 UTC]
Another brilliant rendition.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
luka89 In reply to captshade [2008-04-21 22:19:22 +0000 UTC]
And it shows.
^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1