HOME | DD

BlastWaves — Defiance-class Heavy Battleship by-nc-nd

#1950s #1952 #battleship #bb #blastwaves #class #crosssection #cutaway #defiance #fictional #fictitious #internal #internals #montana #ship #ships #steampowered #vehicle #vessel #warship #worldwar2 #worldwartwo #ww2 #battle_ship #internalview #cross_section #inside_view #shipcutaway #montanaclassbattleship #montana_class #battleship_cutaway #warship_cutaway #crosssections
Published: 2019-10-13 15:11:13 +0000 UTC; Views: 89466; Favourites: 1013; Downloads: 481
Redirect to original
Description A fictional design for an extremely large and heavily armored battleship, based primarily upon the unbuilt American Montana class of battleships.

This drawing depicts such a ship around 1953, with its anti-aircraft cannons still intact and its aircraft catapults removed for helicopter operations, much like that of the Iowa class battleships used during the Korean War.
---
Defiance-class Heavy Battleship
As the war between the Ostellan Republic and the Esternan Federation between the Atellan ocean intensified, it became apparent that the then currently fielded battleships of the Ostellan Navy (Archer-class, Typhoon-class, and Daring-class battleships) were obsolete by modern warship standards. This was due in part to being strictly limited in their construction by arms control treaties signed after the end of the First World War, despite costly modernization and refit programs to combat these effects. As a result, a program to develop a more modern and capable warship no longer limited by international treaties was quickly put in place. While initially many designers and shipbuilding companies approached the Ostellan government to design the next-generation warship, the Ostellan government and Navy ultimately chose to establish a new, specialized division dubbed the Ostellan Naval Committee of Battleship Research (ONCBR) to both design and build what would become known as the Defiance-class of battleships. By May of 1940 the first design was presented to the Centralized Committee of Ostellan Naval Warfare Research (CCONWR), featuring three triple-mount 15-inch gun turrets, 16 anti-aircraft guns, and four dual-purpose 5-inch cannons. This design would later be modified to have four 15-inch turrets and 18 anti-aircraft guns, and a few weeks later further changed to have 20 anti-aircraft guns and eight dual-purpose 5-inch guns. After a year later and nearly two dozen design iterations later, on June of 1941 a finalized design was presented and approved by the CCONWR for production at the North Superna naval yard, with two vessels being dubbed BB-52 Defiance and BB-53 Triumphant to be constructed. However, materials to actually build the two ships would not become available until December of 1942, as the majority of the steel and manufacturing force was being used in the construction of aircraft-carriers and smaller sized warships. 

Between July 1941 to January 1943, under the supervision of numerous high-ranking Ostellan Navy personnel, several changes would once again be made to the "finalized" design of the Defiance-class battleship. These changes included the refinement and lengthening of its hull, the addition of several dozen 20mm anti-aircraft guns, 16 inch sized cannons for its four main-battery gun turrets, and the addition of two more 5-inch dual-purpose turrets. Multiple changes would also be made to its internal configuration, curiously being the enlargement of the spaces for its Admiral and Captain's quarters, and more luxuriously equipped kitchens and pantries. While these changes would increase the price of both ships substantially, the design would still be approved for production with few complaints from high-ranking Ostellan Navy personnel.

By February of 1943, work had finally begun on constructing the first of the two battleships, though now bearing little resemblance to its 1941 design. Despite having a crew of approximately 8,000 workers continuously working around the clock, the first of the Defiance-class battleships would be launched in late 1947, nearly a year and a half after the end of the war in the Attelan ocean. Due to rather demanding labor and few breaks for its shipbuilders, worker strikes were common at the North Superna naval yard, often leading to week or even month long delays in finishing sections of each vessel. The naval yard also lacked the safety features of most Ostellan Republic shipyards, and as a result worker death or injury was a common occurrence caused usually by either collapsing cranes, falling equipment, debris, or more often than not personnel falling off the sides of the ship or dock walls due to a lack of issued safety harnesses. This would in turn cause more worker strikes and delays, with replacement personnel often choosing not to show up or apply to transfer to a safer, less overbearing shipyard. Despite all of this, the two battleships would continue to be built at the North Superna naval yard, as due to the size of the vessels (292.7 m) the North Superna naval yard was the only available and capable yard in Ostella large enough to both build and service the two warships, as well as keep the price of production relatively affordable. With the end of the war and the continuous worker strikes slowing production, the Ostellan government eventually opted to forcibly transfer personnel from other naval yards in the country to speed up the production of both of ships, nearly tripling the amount of active shipbuilding personnel from 8,000 to 22,000.

After nearly four years of continuous labor and technical difficulties, on December 21st of 1947, the first of the two commissioned battleships, BB-52 Defiance, would be launched from the North Superna naval yard at 9:43 AM. While it would eventually pass its shakedown trials successfully, due to a rather sudden oil shortage, the ship would quickly be sent back to its naval yard in March of 1948 and remain there until early February of 1949. The sister ship of Defiance, BB-53 Triumphant, would never reach full completion due to the 1948 oil shortage and would eventually be scrapped due to the Ostellan Navy ultimately never having the funds to operate more than one Defiance-class battleship at a time.

By the time BB-52 would officially be commissioned into Ostellan Navy service and begin patrol operations in Ostellan territory, the single operational Defiance-class battleship would quickly become obsolete with the developement of guided missiles and more advanced warships built by other countries.

Specifications:
Length (overall): 960 feet 6 inches (292.7 m)
Draft: 35 ft (10.66 m) (full load)
37 ft 9 in (11.51 m) (maximum)
Beam: 115 ft 6 in (35.23 m)
Displacement (standard): 70,000 tonnes
Speed: 31 knots
Complement: 2,633

Armor:
Main belt: 16.7 inches (424 mm)
Lower belt: 7.2–8.5 inches (183–216 mm) inclined 10°
Bulkheads: 18 inches (457 mm) forward, 15.25 inches (387 mm) aft
Barbettes: 21.3 inches (541 mm), 18 inches (457 mm) aft
Turret face: 22.5 inches (572 mm)
Conning tower: 14 in (355 mm)
Decks: 3.36 inches (85 mm), 8 in (203 mm), 0.63–1 inch (16–25 mm)

Armament (1952):
4 × triple 16-inch (406 mm)/50 cal turrets
10 × twin 5-inch (127 mm)/54 cal turrets
26 × quad Marloni 40 mm (1.574 in) anti-aircraft guns
74 × twin 20 mm (0.787 in) Konsa anti-aircraft cannons

Aviation facilities:
2 × aircraft catapults (1947)
4 × helicopters (1949)
Related content
Comments: 125

Imp1985 [2021-11-04 20:48:17 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jlvfr [2021-10-17 17:05:03 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Torpiddrawer [2021-09-05 02:28:55 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Emilion-3 [2021-08-24 14:13:44 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

108e8e99e8 [2021-04-28 07:10:02 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stefvdb140 [2021-04-13 20:33:37 +0000 UTC]

Respect that you put minimums put 5+ work into making Full interiors and backstory. You my man are a true battleship lover. Do you mind if i make this ship in 3D? Cause i think it looks interesting

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to stefvdb140 [2021-04-15 21:24:33 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 3

stefvdb140 In reply to BlastWaves [2021-04-15 21:28:53 +0000 UTC]

Also, verry interesting choice to give it 3 rudders, and is it called the defiance cause it defies all logic?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stefvdb140 In reply to BlastWaves [2021-04-15 21:26:51 +0000 UTC]

(Also, i just uploaded a picture of one of mu 3D models, the one i will make of your ship will be about twice as much detailed)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stefvdb140 In reply to BlastWaves [2021-04-15 21:25:36 +0000 UTC]

*happy stef noises*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

coreyps2003 [2020-10-20 19:20:20 +0000 UTC]

👍: 3 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to coreyps2003 [2020-10-21 03:27:41 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Crashley1960 [2020-09-13 09:34:02 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to Crashley1960 [2020-09-13 12:49:42 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MviluUatusun [2020-01-25 19:38:44 +0000 UTC]

Wow!  With those 12 heavy guns, this ship is similar to my largest battleships I'd designed for an as yet unwritten story.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

allman08 [2020-01-17 22:18:48 +0000 UTC]

Honestly, this is super awesome

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to allman08 [2020-01-17 22:59:02 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Operation-Mechanima [2019-12-26 18:26:48 +0000 UTC]

This design is so dope, I love the super tiny details <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to Operation-Mechanima [2019-12-26 21:46:54 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, I'm glad you like it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

eyepilot13 [2019-12-25 15:06:30 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to eyepilot13 [2019-12-25 15:17:56 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Grevinsky79 [2019-12-07 09:36:11 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to Grevinsky79 [2019-12-07 16:02:11 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, Grevinsky!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KaijuLover1954 [2019-11-18 18:02:22 +0000 UTC]

This is really well made ! looks like something id see in METAL SLUG.
How much time did it took to make this?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to KaijuLover1954 [2019-11-18 20:14:21 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

It took about two and a half months of on and off work between other projects.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KaijuLover1954 In reply to BlastWaves [2019-12-01 05:06:31 +0000 UTC]

o.o; that's dedication.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Abbieisurqueen [2019-11-08 17:47:23 +0000 UTC]

Top notch work as usual, Blast. Well done.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to Abbieisurqueen [2019-11-09 00:38:50 +0000 UTC]

Thank you kindly!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Abbieisurqueen In reply to BlastWaves [2019-11-09 04:13:33 +0000 UTC]

Welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Not-Working-Clock [2019-10-31 00:38:23 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to Not-Working-Clock [2019-10-31 01:05:45 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Roddy1990 [2019-10-25 19:52:08 +0000 UTC]

She's a BIG girl...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to Roddy1990 [2019-10-25 23:16:51 +0000 UTC]

Indeed she is!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RRaillery [2019-10-25 12:52:23 +0000 UTC]

Such astounding detail!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to RRaillery [2019-10-25 15:55:19 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

OcGuy1 [2019-10-19 03:16:56 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to OcGuy1 [2019-10-19 13:51:39 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much! I'm glad you like it.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

OcGuy1 In reply to BlastWaves [2019-10-19 16:41:07 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SovietReality [2019-10-17 23:25:27 +0000 UTC]

This is god tier of pixel work, my fucking god are you good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to SovietReality [2019-10-18 02:42:30 +0000 UTC]

Thank you kindly!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lanugget [2019-10-17 01:06:17 +0000 UTC]

Dude, i dont know how long it took your to make that, but i love it. Please never stop making art like this

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to lanugget [2019-10-17 13:43:29 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad you like it! It took quite a bit of time, but I don't intend to stop.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lanugget In reply to BlastWaves [2019-10-18 00:47:51 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MacPaul [2019-10-15 11:02:21 +0000 UTC]

A lot of work in this, kudos. But the displacement should rather be 100.000  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to MacPaul [2019-10-15 14:22:13 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! I based the numbers on the largest Montana-class battleship scheme (BB-65-8), which had a standard displacement of 70,000 tonnes and a planned trial displacement of 82,000 tonnes. It was also larger than this ship at 1050 feet in length, so I think around 70,000 tonnes is accurate to what it would be.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nhinhonhinho [2019-10-15 10:27:06 +0000 UTC]

cu7ng1wow very nice


👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to nhinhonhinho [2019-10-15 14:22:16 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

nhinhonhinho In reply to BlastWaves [2019-10-17 14:09:55 +0000 UTC]

np

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nhinhonhinho In reply to BlastWaves [2019-10-16 11:55:26 +0000 UTC]

No problem

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

r9specter528 [2019-10-15 07:03:00 +0000 UTC]

  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>