Comments: 45
mmmpoptart [2005-04-20 18:51:11 +0000 UTC]
absolutely stunning!
π: 0 β©: 0
f0rTyLeGz [2005-04-20 04:31:43 +0000 UTC]
glorious!
π: 0 β©: 0
ayo [2005-04-19 13:42:04 +0000 UTC]
the sky is wonderful !! congrat !
π: 0 β©: 0
nasht-01 [2005-04-19 07:44:58 +0000 UTC]
you did a very good cleaning work! lovely picture!
π: 0 β©: 0
jpspyro [2005-04-19 04:50:41 +0000 UTC]
gorgeous
π: 0 β©: 0
davegarbs [2005-04-19 04:04:55 +0000 UTC]
nice...defininately looks less "fooled around" with
π: 0 β©: 0
disfractional [2004-08-18 06:28:39 +0000 UTC]
i love those cloudy wisps!
π: 0 β©: 0
kpanic [2004-08-09 20:24:23 +0000 UTC]
very rich in colour, contrast is real nice also.
π: 0 β©: 0
sidetracked [2004-07-21 03:50:28 +0000 UTC]
This is so amazing... the composition is great, you fit the whole scene in the frame...
each element is gorgeous in its own right, but you then take it a step up by combining them just right. The sky is stunning, the grasses add a rough-growth texture to the bottom, and the rocks, water, and lush green hills frame the horizon and create a wonderful balance along side that "painted" sky
top notch work as always,
keep em coming!
π: 0 β©: 0
lostheart [2004-07-15 20:11:47 +0000 UTC]
Another impressive landscape...what I admire here is the clarity and the fact that the image is tack-sharp!
Wonderfully composed and layered with this to-die-for sky, the mountain range and the brown grub on the sea.
The thing you gotta do in your upcoming Deviations is to provide us with a little more detail on lenses, filters, etc. ...I'm always interested in this technical stuff.
Top notch work again...
π: 0 β©: 1
bkm In reply to lostheart [2004-07-16 03:25:36 +0000 UTC]
I'll try to remember. I post pro my images in PS so the exif information gets lost on the way. I shot this handheld with my EOS 10D and the EF 17-40 F/4L lense. I shoot most of my stuff it in "RAW", so post pro is therefore required. So I leveled the sky and the ground separately in PS to gain contrast on the ground/water without losing cloud detail.
ISO 100
Focal length 17mm
Aperture 4.0
Shutter speed 1/3000
Thank you.
π: 0 β©: 1
bkm In reply to sidetracked [2004-07-17 10:30:41 +0000 UTC]
It's not worth it if you don't like to fiddle with the images in post pro. So for most people it's not worth it at all. It can even be a negative experience because it's such a long road to go compared to ready-to-use jpegs. But to me it's worth it because I like to balance my pictures in PS most of the time because I think I do a better job at it than the camera does (To meet my personal style I mean). And in "raw" the camera hasn't smeared its settings on top of the picture before I smear MY settings onto it. So you put less "exhaution" on the image so-to-speak.
Thanks so much for your inputs on my deviations BTW. And I'll try out your tip on EXIF, thanks.
π: 0 β©: 1
sidetracked In reply to bkm [2004-07-21 04:10:50 +0000 UTC]
Hey, thanks for the advice, I appreciate you taking the time!
I think I'm just gonna mix up Raw and JPEG... if it's a less important shot, I'll take my chances with JPEG (I don't have enough memory card space to really go all RAW quite yet... my 256 only holds about 50 images...)
π: 0 β©: 0
bkm In reply to JoshClarkeDraws [2004-07-15 16:43:01 +0000 UTC]
Hehe, yeah, I will try to set up an account during this month.
All my images in deviantart are shot with digital SLR (With a few exceptions where I've used a IxusV) (most of them with a Canon EOS 300D, but I used my 10D for this one).
Thank you.
π: 0 β©: 1
JoshClarkeDraws In reply to bkm [2004-07-15 17:00:30 +0000 UTC]
Ooh, I was thinking about getting a Canon EOS. So you would you recommend it?
π: 0 β©: 1
bkm In reply to JoshClarkeDraws [2004-07-16 04:16:57 +0000 UTC]
The 300D? Sure, the 300D is a fenomenal DSLR for the money, no doubt about it.
π: 0 β©: 2
chris-alex [2004-07-15 15:44:09 +0000 UTC]
It's a very wonderful picture. I've added it to my favourites.
π: 0 β©: 0
dfiller [2004-07-15 03:48:06 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful photograph, I love it when the sky has a combination of different clouds. The water, the leaves, it's all gorgeous, congrats on a stellar photograph.
π: 0 β©: 0
80schick [2004-07-15 03:13:50 +0000 UTC]
There is so much color and texture in this photo, I don't know where to begin!
I like how, in contrast with the vibrant blue sky, the water is a slate-grey color. There's a surreal element to it where, on the right, it gets incredibly smooth and calm.
The "rule of thirds" is followed nicely in the foreground, with the rocks in the first third, the bright brown and the lone rock in the center for the second third, and the abundance of water in the last.
The darkness of the hills sets the stage upon which the hovering cloud is exposed in all it's glory. It is actually overlapping the top of the hill, which makes one wonder: "Is that really a hill and not a mountain, or are those clouds just exceptionally low to the ground?"
Lastly, the continuation of the land along the horizon with clouds, once it ends, leads the eye across the whole picture.
This is, undoubtedly, a very well-composed shot.
π: 0 β©: 0
mackykitty [2004-07-15 02:27:44 +0000 UTC]
Simply beautiful capture.
π: 0 β©: 0
ALIENLABS [2004-07-15 01:31:46 +0000 UTC]
Awesome!
Your photos are so vibrant, and crisp.
π: 0 β©: 0
HaNeshama [2004-07-15 01:31:11 +0000 UTC]
The "feathers" on the clouds are great! Wonderful picture...
π: 0 β©: 0
duende [2004-07-15 01:28:28 +0000 UTC]
really beautiful shot! the sky is amazing
π: 0 β©: 0