Comments: 14
heliotropium [2010-05-08 17:46:32 +0000 UTC]
Overall
Vision
Originality
Technique
Impact
It's a really fine, soft and classical theme. The set of the picture is very rich. Despite my good appreciation for the theme, there are some questions to make, with your permition:
- the main focus for the lecture is in the right side of the square; so, I would invert the horizontal position, enhancing the blossom flower, it petals and the male organs
- my intuition brings me some question with the insertion for the set for the square format; if this picture was mine, i'd try another format or a resource of cuting, e.g.
I'm saying it supposing a more large original take, disconted the cut was made for the presented square;in a positive case, some round for the set can improve the dynamics, in the way to get out of excess of paralelism, resulting in a more naturalness for the beautiful theme.
I hope some of considerations may enjoy yourself ! e.deviantart.net/emoticons/h/h⦠" width="38" height="15" alt="" title="Hug"/> Regis 30°S BR
π: 0 β©: 2
heliotropium In reply to heliotropium [2010-05-09 13:44:53 +0000 UTC]
Dear member,
The picture is beautiful as it are presented, anyway.
You made it in YOUR way. For me - and I'm not professional - don't have standards, patterns.
(I didn't read the other critique, to be not influentiated.
The critic was only an exercise, and you request critics, it's positive, to share thoughts, alternatives, reflexions; in your case, for a relationship. To know persons, is to know ourselves. It causes some satisfacton for an inner
claim.
Somethimes, I make a submission, and I'm sure
that's all right. In another moment, I put the picture to subm. on the desktop, and I procastinate, stop my impulse, making studies, changes, and i gave me the chance for doubt.
Also, when I confused, I look for help.
I heard here is a laboratory (labor) for art and life. People are here for the more diverses motes.
I consider me an 'absolute beginner', and my satisfaction is not for the number of views, features, DDs, despite he fact some of pictures deserves DD. Here, female nudes and digital art seem the champions, and this fact is the way for
success and money. But I don't really care. My being is not good for busyness hehe but I need for, like everyone. Congratulations for your diferentiated art, and the way to watch the subjects. For me that's a fine goal ! Personalities like this make their own way and the others follow...It happened with me !
from RΓ©gis, also with the Southern Cross, 30Β°S BR
π: 0 β©: 0
bgnr In reply to heliotropium [2010-05-09 02:45:31 +0000 UTC]
Thanks so much for the critique, a previouse critique picked up the positioning in relation to the rule of 3rds. As i am a very novice photographer i had not heard of this rule but after investigation i can completley understand that the picture would be much more appealing to the eye if it had been framed and cropped in a more proffessional manner.
Thanks so much i really appreciate the effort on the critique
π: 0 β©: 0
bgnr In reply to koroshino [2010-05-04 00:46:29 +0000 UTC]
thank you very much for the feed back. i have not heard of the rule of thirds but now that it is pointed out i can see exactly what you mean
π: 0 β©: 1
koroshino In reply to bgnr [2010-05-04 04:24:18 +0000 UTC]
definitely google it. It's what photographers use all the time. and your very welcome. Only way we get better is from constructive crit.
π: 0 β©: 1
bgnr In reply to koroshino [2010-05-04 05:01:37 +0000 UTC]
too true, i will look it up and use the info to improve my work. Greatly appreciated
π: 0 β©: 1
bgnr In reply to koroshino [2010-05-04 08:27:23 +0000 UTC]
cheers will do...thinking of trying to get some shots of a tall ship as it leaves port on the weekend.
π: 0 β©: 0
AdrianBlake [2009-12-09 07:28:25 +0000 UTC]
This is an amazing shot!
π: 0 β©: 1
bgnr In reply to AdrianBlake [2009-12-09 09:00:15 +0000 UTC]
why thank you i appreciate it....sometimes it is the simplest things that work best
π: 0 β©: 1
AdrianBlake In reply to bgnr [2009-12-10 00:11:13 +0000 UTC]
YEah I agree!
π: 0 β©: 0
bgnr In reply to LittleRedShany [2009-12-09 05:03:41 +0000 UTC]
thanks so much, i was unsure of whether to post it or not. Very much appreciated and thanks for the faves
π: 0 β©: 0