HOME | DD

Balddog4 — Gun Control

#control #gun
Published: 2017-06-08 06:44:17 +0000 UTC; Views: 994; Favourites: 34; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description Here's another picture for all Liberal Haters to hate. Anyone who really and truly support our Constitution should know that the Government has no right nor jurisdiction to take away people's right to own a gun.

Now I'm all for background checks and all that, but in reality even then you can't always predict if and when a sane person will go insane and kill people. Which is why we need something to protect us from crazy people.

Think about it, what is the safer environment? A place where only one person is designated to be trained and carry a gun? Or a place in which multiple people are trained and carry a gun? Or a place where no one is trained and no one carries a gun?

Odds are you'd choose the second environment, why? Because it's safer to be with a lot of people who are carrying a gun and are trained. Criminals who wants to do a lot of damage and cause a lot of fear, will go some place where there are little to or no guns present. Why? Because they want to be in control. If more than one person in a room has a gun, safely hidden away, it lessens the abilities of a criminal's to be in control.

Besides think about how people killed in the past. Before the 15-16 hundreds when guns were starting to be used all over the world, and not just in china. So what did people use to kill other people? What ever they could find to use. Swords, knifes, poison, clubs. People never stopped murdering people for thousands of years. And you think that by getting rid of guns will cause people to stop killing each other? NO! In fact until recently Police officers in England never carried guns. But in light of the recent terrorist attacks, they are now required to carry fire arms.

People will find ways to kill each other. Which is why guns are needed for us to protect ourselves. Don't blame guns for killing, it's the person who holds the gun that is in control.
Related content
Comments: 67

Nudemodel3 [2022-06-16 08:23:54 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 2

ChurchillheavyALT In reply to Nudemodel3 [2024-06-28 21:41:15 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SuperArtMaxim In reply to Nudemodel3 [2023-07-18 23:02:05 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

truckinmeat [2021-10-25 03:32:43 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

yeetsauce44 [2021-07-30 23:49:47 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

truckinmeat In reply to yeetsauce44 [2021-10-25 03:42:08 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 2

SuperArtMaxim In reply to truckinmeat [2023-07-18 23:34:21 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

yeetsauce44 In reply to truckinmeat [2021-12-22 21:42:46 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

truckinmeat In reply to yeetsauce44 [2021-12-23 15:20:16 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

yeetsauce44 In reply to truckinmeat [2021-12-23 21:18:22 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

LayneSucksAtArt [2019-05-07 20:39:09 +0000 UTC]

I hate this. 

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Scorching-Whirlwind [2019-01-17 12:05:23 +0000 UTC]

Yes it does you deplorable asshole.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheOhioanBuckeye In reply to Scorching-Whirlwind [2020-12-19 05:45:03 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

yeetsauce44 In reply to TheOhioanBuckeye [2021-12-23 21:18:43 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Krysnha [2018-09-01 03:18:05 +0000 UTC]

I remember several years ago a show a talk show, they talk gun control in mi country and the invite a gun control pro and a ban pro, and beleive in one hour the guy that represent the equivalent of the national gun asociation talk for less than two inutes, he introduce himself and at the ending and yet what he said at the end was so true.
What he said is that if someone wants to kill you, rob you, or whatever he or she or whatever will do it, a gun allow you to defend you because the police can not arrive inmidiatly

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Xenotiic [2017-11-26 20:03:02 +0000 UTC]

Australia
*nervously runs away*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tikiyachod [2017-09-01 09:51:56 +0000 UTC]

I oppose gun control.
I support the rights to own a gun.

I hope one day more countries allow gun ownership.
And if people have guns of their own in Mainland China, the Communist tyranny would collapse within hours because the people had enough.

And if there were the rights to own guns in Germany, scumbags like Shitler couldn't rise to power and do crazy things. Sure, at that time Communist influence was strong and powerful, but a moment later the people would awaken and immediately topple any sort of tyranny and instill a better government.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Paremuine [2017-07-12 17:40:03 +0000 UTC]

Liberals don't hate guns, socialists do.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Graeystone [2017-06-13 15:48:35 +0000 UTC]

Gun Control - Hitting the target with the first shot.

👍: 2 ⏩: 0

OhgodMelanie [2017-06-09 01:51:56 +0000 UTC]

I agree completely.
Why make laws against laws?
Since when have killers obeyed the law???

👍: 1 ⏩: 2

SuperArtMaxim In reply to OhgodMelanie [2023-07-18 23:35:19 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Finland-Skywalker In reply to OhgodMelanie [2018-10-31 15:18:09 +0000 UTC]

Exactly!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SilverBeastLaguz [2017-06-08 23:56:50 +0000 UTC]

Not to mention, even in a gun-free zone, the bad guy will always find a way to get a gun and bring it into the zone to kill someone or some people.

👍: 1 ⏩: 2

ChurchillheavyALT In reply to SilverBeastLaguz [2024-06-28 21:42:56 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SuperArtMaxim In reply to SilverBeastLaguz [2023-07-18 23:35:36 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SilverBeastLaguz In reply to SuperArtMaxim [2023-07-19 00:03:02 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SuperArtMaxim In reply to SilverBeastLaguz [2023-07-19 00:37:09 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SilverBeastLaguz In reply to SuperArtMaxim [2023-07-19 01:19:11 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SuperArtMaxim In reply to SilverBeastLaguz [2023-07-19 21:53:00 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SilverBeastLaguz In reply to SuperArtMaxim [2023-07-19 21:59:39 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SuperArtMaxim In reply to SilverBeastLaguz [2023-07-19 23:19:40 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SilverBeastLaguz In reply to SuperArtMaxim [2023-07-19 23:53:27 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SuperArtMaxim In reply to SilverBeastLaguz [2023-07-20 20:14:49 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SilverBeastLaguz In reply to SuperArtMaxim [2023-07-21 00:56:39 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dragonpyper [2017-06-08 22:08:26 +0000 UTC]

All of the 'mass shootings' have happened in "Gun Free Zones".

Schools - Columbine, Sandy Hook, etc.
Aurora Colorado Theater
Orlando Florida Nightclub
Fort Hood (believe it or not at the time soldiers were not allowed to carry sidearms on base)
San Bernardino Ca. ( I lost a friend from the renaissance faire in that one. He was a good man.)

There are just a few examples. The thing is the people that will do this, do not follow the law. They're going to do what they will and a sign isn't going to stop them.

Here are some other examples that you've probably never heard of...
Clackamas Oregon
Pearl HS Mississippi
Muskegon Colorado
Golden Food Market Virginia
Winnemucca Nevada

Why haven't we heard about these?
Simply because these potential 'mass shootings' were stopped.
Not by Law Enforcement (Police or Sheriffs), but by armed citizens who were legally carrying and acted.
In fact the shooter in the Clackamas Mall  saw that there was someone who was armed and at that point killed himself.
The casualties in the others were very low and only a few fatalities (Sad that there were any at all).

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dragonpyper [2017-06-08 21:35:30 +0000 UTC]

Right again, Daniel.
Where I currently live, we have predators that walk on 4 leg and predators that walk on 2 legs and has very restrictive gun laws. Also has a lot of criminal based shooting incidents.
Where I'm retiring to, has more of the 4 legged type, still has some of the 2 legged types about and is an 'open carry' state. The criminal based shootings are low...

I've had several instances where my firearms were indispensable, including a dogs that got onto my property and went after my livestock and an attempted break-in one night.
Either way, it's better to have your firearms and not need to use them, than to have the need and not have your firearms.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

SilverKazeNinja [2017-06-08 17:59:15 +0000 UTC]

Just gonna leave this here...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SuperArtMaxim In reply to SilverKazeNinja [2023-07-18 23:53:11 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RavenHeart1984 [2017-06-08 17:51:26 +0000 UTC]

it's never works

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pixiefairydustpinup [2017-06-08 16:45:25 +0000 UTC]

"And you think that by getting rid of guns will cause people to stop killing each other?"

It would stop the mass shootings that devastate communities and that seem to be happening on an almost daily basis.

"People will find ways to kill each other. Which is why guns are needed for us to protect ourselves."

The flip side of that is: People will find ways to kill each other. Lets make it easier for them to kill by giving them high powered, semi automatic rifles with large capacity magazines.


👍: 2 ⏩: 1

king-of-hydras In reply to pixiefairydustpinup [2017-06-08 17:17:33 +0000 UTC]

Don't more gun attacks happen in areas with less gun control

👍: 1 ⏩: 2

pixiefairydustpinup In reply to king-of-hydras [2017-06-08 18:27:14 +0000 UTC]

No gun attacks happen in areas with no guns...

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

king-of-hydras In reply to pixiefairydustpinup [2017-06-08 19:16:14 +0000 UTC]

In Sweden it's illegal to own a firearm and they haven't had a massacre since 1961. It is legal to won a gun in certain parts in the US and here's a list of massacres we've had since then www.google.com/amp/s/thinkprog…

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

MadKingFroggy In reply to king-of-hydras [2017-06-08 17:54:36 +0000 UTC]

Funny, I live in a country with fairly strict gun control (but gun ownership is allowed with training for some people like farmers) and if any shootings happen they're on the news right away because they're so rare. :/

I think it depends on the culture. Here's we're more relaxed and laid-back, so we're less likely to shoot someone.
In America people want to sue each other for trivial things, are paranoid, fear driven, trigger happy people with a gun culture. Need I say more?

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

king-of-hydras In reply to MadKingFroggy [2017-06-08 19:16:50 +0000 UTC]

Yes. procrastinatingstill.deviantar…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MadKingFroggy In reply to king-of-hydras [2017-06-09 22:14:01 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

king-of-hydras In reply to MadKingFroggy [2017-06-09 22:50:52 +0000 UTC]

I don't follow

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MadKingFroggy In reply to king-of-hydras [2017-06-09 22:51:15 +0000 UTC]

I was agreeing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fujin777 [2017-06-08 16:36:01 +0000 UTC]

Seems legit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ReclusiveChicken [2017-06-08 16:05:57 +0000 UTC]

the proletariat shall arm themselves whenever necessary; they owe no obligations to anyone but themselves.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>