Comments: 112
ninereeds-DA [2008-06-11 10:53:49 +0000 UTC]
This is wonderful. I love the dreamy softness.
π: 0 β©: 1
adagio-sostenuto [2008-04-07 03:16:28 +0000 UTC]
Athansor, I just found your reply & don't worry about not 'saying enough' or anything like that, your reply said a lot & was very much appreciated. (And I hope my replying here doesn't erase any files or comments!) Please know that any ' poems'βif my comments can even be called that!βcome from your work: I viewed a number of them and they evoke a poetry all their own...and on influence: Stravinsky was once asked if he was "disrespectful" by transforming some Baroque masters into something 'Stravinsky-esque': He said, "you speak of respect, but I speak of Love." Yes...From the depths of your own vision, you can bow with love to the many who've moved you along the way; but, like Stravinsky, it's your work, your heart & vision, and you can say to those who've moved you, "thank you"...well, I'll be visiting again & probably leave a couple more long comments (just warning!). Hard to look & not say thank you for all I've seen...
π: 0 β©: 0
adagio-sostenuto [2008-04-04 13:33:21 +0000 UTC]
(i'm aware that you're influenced by JMC and other masters of that time; I know their work and I can see some of them in your style; but your work is wholly yours w/ your presence & vision, and it touches because of something deeply from inside of you, and it is magical...)
π: 0 β©: 1
Athansor In reply to adagio-sostenuto [2008-04-06 06:30:17 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! It is always a pleasure to have someone else understand the difference between "influenced by", and "trying to replicate". JMC was perfect--for her time. That I love her work, and have her sometimes subliminally, sometimes consciously, at the back of my mind while I work, does *not* mean that I feel the need to try to reproduce her work. Why would I? (Other than as an academic exercise, perhaps!) To do so would be silly--as I don't share her background--I only admire the end result of work that came from who and what she was. My own work must come from the same place--who and what *I* am--and while a deep admiration for her work is part of that, it's not the whole. And likewise, for any of my other influences.
And while I honestly don't mind if my watchers think I'm trying to reproduce her work (or anyone else's), it's sometimes a little trying to to come up with ways of dealing with good-intentioned advice as to how I can make Image XYZ more like her (or someone else's) work.
The flip side of that, is that it's twice as refreshing when someone groks what is actually happening.
As for your other comments...you must forgive me if I take more time to savor them, before responding...they have well and truly bowled me over, and left me speechless. Through your words, I see my work both anew--with a feeling of "yes, that's what I meant/was thinking/was feeling", and for the first time, with a feeling of awe, that you should see so much there.
That you are a writer, is obvious--you paint with words. That you are a true art afficionado, is equally obvious--and adds weight to your compliments.
I feel like someone has written me beautiful poems...and any attempt at talking about them will brush the bloom away...so, yes, they'll have to sit and percolate a bit, before I can properly respond to them.
Besides. Once I reply to them, they'll disappear from my message center, and then I can't reread them, and gloat over them as easily.
π: 0 β©: 0
adagio-sostenuto [2008-04-04 12:17:15 +0000 UTC]
I always feel a little out-of-place commenting here since I post in other arts; but my years studying art makes walking these galleries a great treat. I found your gallery and found myself almost stilled---your work is very intimate and inward. Your mastery of this style speaks of true intimacy, a deep regard for the one-on-one of a heart exposed, a sense of visual caress, and above all, love---for your subject, exuding from within your subject, and in everything you allow around your subject. Your lighting seems to come as much from within this woman as from without: from within her gown, within the space around her, and from places undefinable by 'locale'. I see this in a number of your works; and you don't seem to wane, ever; each work does it without artifice, as if you 'wish' it out of your subject (which I know you can't; I'm aware of the many streams that lead to a single work). You capture gown-lights as if they were painted on, or were pouring through the furrows themselves, emanating from within them & showing that it isn't just the costumes you choose, but what you do with them that makes them 'sing' (and the song would be a Lied, an intimate song, rather than an oratorio). The face has light, but not more than other parts of her body (another thing I've noticed in some of your works) allowing part of her to remain in subtle mystery; and, through focus, grays/sepias and an organic lighting, her presence is as much 'felt into' the picture as physically placed before us. These works, which could be so contrived, are instead quiet communions, both intimate and dear (even the light in the viewer's upper left corner seems to enter quietly, never breaking the solitude, never taking over the shot---choices which may be 'normal', but which show your sense of deep respect for your subject). The folk-legend is given a voice as eloquent as any tale; and you've ended up with portraiture that is both private but genuinely open, very dear, and filled with a word that's hard to use but the only one I can find: grace. Very sensitive work. I'll see more...
π: 0 β©: 0
Athansor In reply to Alene [2008-03-11 11:27:36 +0000 UTC]
Canaries are charming little fellows!
Hmmm...well, the source is certainly something I would've had exposure too, as I used to live off the Andrew Lang fairy books...(funny how many elements of the classic fairy tales this one had in it!)...so it's certainly *possible* this is what I had in mind, and that I was just confusing it with other fairy tales..."The Canary Prince", for instance, was another one I remembered, after following a link from the article you sent me...but I can't shake the feeling that the bird was feeding the girl...and I've got this image in my head of the girl sitting in a cottage window, and the bird pressing food against the girl's lips.
So many tales are alike, though, that I could definitely be confusing several tales together--and yours is certainly the closest I've come across so far! (And thanks--I hadn't read that tale in YEARS...I need to track it down and reread it now, after having read the synopsis! )
π: 0 β©: 1
Athansor In reply to Alene [2008-03-12 02:26:56 +0000 UTC]
*sigh...* Sad, but true! The best, most lovely books go right out of print! Fortunately, they often have a second life on eBay!
I mixed Tuppy's red-factor food in with his normal pellets, so he didn't really notice...but he only got a little of it, even so. (Yes, I'm mean--I made my bird eat pellets. I gave him fresh greens every day, too--but unlike my LAST canary--he wouldn't touch 'em. I think it's because I didn't have any finches in with him, to teach him it was okay to eat them. )
Your Freddy is lovely--a very soft sort of red--just at the stage where they start to get really cuddly looking. He's charming. And your sketches of him are terrific--spot on! (You've PERFECTLY captured that cute, almost Disney-esque little face they have, as well as the pert way they stand. Aww...I miss my Tuppy, now! I need to get another canary--and some more finches. I'm jealous of your handsome little baby! )
π: 0 β©: 1
fondaffections [2008-03-08 05:31:59 +0000 UTC]
Very nice work you have here. Enchanting. A pleasure to see.
π: 0 β©: 1
AnnaKirsten [2008-02-05 22:53:56 +0000 UTC]
This is to let you know that this image (and possibly more that the one) is featured in my latest News Article on Expression in Art [link]
π: 0 β©: 1
Athansor In reply to Jack-Evans [2008-04-06 18:38:55 +0000 UTC]
No, I always managed to get assignments in on time...but on dA? Forget it! According to my stats, I've given 40 comments for every 10 I receive...with a grand total of 14,142 (make that, 14,143, after this one's crossed off! ), which is an average of 18.58 per day, if you subtract the year I took off...and I STILL average about 250 or so messages unanswered, at any given time. Last night, I worked 9 hours straight (until 6am, actually), to clear out approximately 150 messages (including reciprocal visits, etc)--and I STILL have 250 or so to go. Trust me--6 months is NOTHIN'--I've got at least 50 comments sitting at the bottom of my pile that were old, last January--which was when I managed to get down to only 87 or so, while away at a conference...who knows when I'll ever see THOSE comments again! :/
Given that I have exactly 1-2 free hours per day in which to cook meals and eat, work on my art, pay bills, maybe have a social life, read and respond to emails, and research things for new projects, the miracle is that ANYTHING ever gets answered around here!
More than "better late than ever", "there's never enough time" applies to me!
π: 0 β©: 1
vcrimson [2007-11-07 12:17:03 +0000 UTC]
another stunner from you, aurora!!! this is beautiful and i really love the colour treatment! it's gorgeous!
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>