Comments: 19
Asuma17 [2017-05-30 15:15:45 +0000 UTC]
Still making them over feathered I see. At least when I think of a Compy considering its environment, it just a little set of downy fur-like plumage, but not this puffy. Also if you added that the Compy's are assorted with Passerine DNA, then should they exhibit a highly pack momentum? Sparrows and other passerines are highly known to socialize in large groups so to each their own I think a tribal formation in the Compies would suffice, it makes perfect sense to this since and to show that dinosaur exhibit high levels sociability while keeping to themselves like in the Kiwi.
Great job nonetheless though ~ Β
π: 1 β©: 0
AchillobatorPrince [2015-10-31 03:05:08 +0000 UTC]
Holy Corythosaur crap, THESE ARE TOO AWESOME FOR ME TO HANDLE, YOU MUST MAKE MORE!! I have some suggestions:
Spinosaurus
Pteranodons
Mosasaurus
Dimorphodon
Junior T.rex
Ceratosaurus
Dilophosaurus
Triceratops
Pachycephalosaurus
Raptors from: JP, TLW, JP3
PLEEEEEEEAAAASE!?!?
π: 0 β©: 1
AchillobatorPrince In reply to Arbitran [2015-11-02 22:47:22 +0000 UTC]
I "literally" cannot wait to see feathered JP gallimimus and fuzzy JP pteranodons.π
π
π: 0 β©: 0
Traheripteryx [2015-10-04 14:14:01 +0000 UTC]
Now the line "What are ya? Is it... A bird or something?" makes actually sense!
π: 0 β©: 1
raygungoth [2015-07-07 17:19:59 +0000 UTC]
Nice! In the book they were looking deliberately for a small scavenger to clone explicitly because the gut flora and the feces-decay bacteria and fungus weren't around, compys were released into the park to reduce levels of dino-poop shoveling needs. Could probably do something with that.
π: 0 β©: 1
Arbitran In reply to raygungoth [2015-07-07 18:59:41 +0000 UTC]
Definitely an interesting idea. They do proliferate quickly, so maybe either some light coprophagia as a dietary supplement, or maybe they gather dung to hold their nests together?
π: 0 β©: 1
raygungoth In reply to Arbitran [2015-07-07 20:51:22 +0000 UTC]
Quite possibly - I also recall in the book that the dinosaurs were all sick most of the time because of the lack of gut flora. That's why the Stegosaurs were in such terrible condition all the time.
π: 0 β©: 1
Arbitran In reply to raygungoth [2015-07-08 00:55:26 +0000 UTC]
Perhaps my park's dinos are a bit better off, from the use of avialan DNA that allows the proper development of guy flora; although I suppose it's plausible that it could be underdeveloped in some specimens (especially specimens like steogsaurs, that are considerably diverged from theropods).
π: 0 β©: 1
raygungoth In reply to Arbitran [2015-07-08 05:48:26 +0000 UTC]
I agree - the maniraptorians should at the very least be perfectly fine, and the inclusion of avian DNA after beta versions of the animals might be to cover this aspect much better than the effort of cloning a whole other species.
π: 0 β©: 1
Arbitran In reply to raygungoth [2015-07-08 06:23:19 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, for sure. I suppose ornithischians as a whole are probably worse off; and presumably croc DNA wouldn't be close enough to be of too much help. Maybe by the time Jurassic World opens, InGen has been able to engineer replacement gut flora and such? It would make sense why they seem to be healthy compared to those in the original park.
Also, I've been tossing around the idea of other parks... what if InGen attempted prehistoric mammals on another island? Cenozoic Park? Or what if there are experimental Paleozoic clones on another island? I don't see why InGen would stop at archosaurs; surely Cenozoic genetic material would be much more intact and easily recovered, compared to Mesozoic.
π: 0 β©: 1
raygungoth In reply to Arbitran [2015-07-08 09:28:55 +0000 UTC]
Oh, yes! You know, InGen could sell a lot of that as ecological: they're bringing back species whose ecosystem still misses them: "We brought back the Shasta ground sloth and we're going to release them into the deserts so the yucca won't go extinct!" or "Check out our adorable Tasmanian tiger rehab facility"
I would pay money to pet a Glyptodont.
π: 0 β©: 1