Comments: 15
kecen [2010-06-23 03:33:42 +0000 UTC]
This captures a very pre-dawn or evening feel. Perhaps it could be a video game. The Frog Catcher: Catch Them All!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kaede-kit [2010-05-15 04:00:34 +0000 UTC]
Ooh, interesting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pacman23 [2010-05-12 18:03:29 +0000 UTC]
VERY nice, it also has a James Jean vibe to it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TenderlySharp [2010-05-12 03:55:14 +0000 UTC]
Interesting display of intention.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
idiacanthus [2010-05-12 01:08:43 +0000 UTC]
Oh, nicely done! Those stylized willows are super gorgeous...I think you're emulating the Rackham style quite well, here. The bold lines and diluted colors really capture the atmosphere of his pieces ;D. That's pretty interesting to hear about his process, too; I didn't know he used bleach to distress his work! :o
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Batfood [2010-05-11 21:42:35 +0000 UTC]
WOW!
Simply gorgeous. I adore the concept and the atmosphere. It reminds me a bit of the enemies in Okami, which is a good thing because I think the character design is phenomenal in that game, particularly the enemies
The subtle reflections in the water really help give it a watery feel. I love how the sky blends into the swamp, too; it makes it seem foggy.
The texture in the sky gives the impression that there's more in the background that's just obscured by the fog, giving it more depth. Amazing!
I wish I could comment better. Keep up the great work- I always love seeing your art!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
InknPaper [2010-05-11 18:11:39 +0000 UTC]
Wow! I mean WOW, this is stunning, I love the whole feel to this, with the water and the trees and the anatomy, just wow. Also Arthur Rackhams is awesome <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sneaksby [2010-05-11 17:55:02 +0000 UTC]
This is a really neat concept! The frog is cute, haha.
Annnd, that's a really interesting tidbit about paint composition. Interesting!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ihartsnape [2010-05-11 17:15:56 +0000 UTC]
It's gorgeous! Very well done.
I don't know much about the artist whose style you've based it on (though I've seen a few of his works). Forgive my ignorance, but why is it we can't reproduce works like his today? I'm very curious to know now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Andoledius In reply to ihartsnape [2010-05-11 17:23:00 +0000 UTC]
its fine i had no idea how he worked until very recently either. Anyway, he used a combination of watercolours, ink, and bleach. First he would lay down the ink/watercolor, then paint over it with bleach, which would "erase" the watercolors in a way, and give the painting a "blurred" feel, which is what hes famous for. (example [link] )
well since his death to now, they've changed the chemical components in watercolors and ink, so it no longer reacts to bleach the way it used too. so you can take the same brand of paints, but it wont react to bleach at all :/ The only way to recreate it would be to make your own ink without those certain chemicals. unfortunately for me i dont have the alchemy skills required to try such a task.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Razkall [2010-05-11 17:07:50 +0000 UTC]
I absolutely love the look of the entire image (: Is it a mix of digital and traditional techniques?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Razkall In reply to Andoledius [2010-05-11 17:13:49 +0000 UTC]
Well it is hard to make something LOOK like you painted it on the computer in my book, I bow to you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0