Description
They'd known that climate change would be a hard bullet to bite for decades, and the nations of Earth cooperated to mitigate its effects. They had plans; they had timetables; they had commitment. And maybe it would have been enough, in another world. But this was not that other world. In this world, black swans were prone to rear their ugly heads. In this world, their grand plans, and their grand world, millennia in the making, collapsed.
The culprit came as a stowaway with the pretty trinkets, slimstones, exported to Earth from Titan at tremendous expense to adorn the necks and wrists of the the fashionable and pretentious. In the diligence of their avarice, the Titanians sought the scintillating pebbles deep in their moon's Methane seas. Aside from the stones they cared little for what was in the hydrocarbon abyss, which cursory study had shown to be lifeless and uninteresting. They were wrong. The lifeforms of Titan were nothing like even the single-celled organisms of Earth and Mars. They were diffuse, non-cellular chemical patterns at home in the deep volcanic rifts at the bottom of Titan's seas.
The life form, later branded the Othrys Plague, found its way to Earth lying dormant in slimstones, unlooked for and unrecognized. The critical leak was tracked down to a single slimstone bracelet lost on a ship in the Arctic Ocean in 2083. Once the Othrys arrived at the sea bottom, it began to spread. After evolving in the sparse liquid water of Titanian cryovolcanoes, the deep ocean of Earth provided a bonanza. The only thing that had kept the Othrys Plague from spreading elsewhere was another critical component to their life cycle: high pressure methane. This was available in spades in the form of clathrates locked in the marine permafrost. The Othrys Plague's flourishing produced just enough ambient heat to thaw the permafrost, releasing the methane into the atmosphere.
According to the "Clathrate Gun Hypothesis", once large amounts of methane were released, that methane would further warm the ocean, leading to further releases of methane in a positive feedback loop as unstoppable and violent as igniting the powder in a gun. Climatologists had calculated that Earth would just barely escape this catastrophe, but the Othrys Plague pushed the climate over the tipping point. In the space of three years, global temperatures rose to five degrees above their preindustrial levels.
Nearly the entire globe suffered long burning droughts followed by brief and violent flooding. Vast forest fires raged out of control, decimating the world's carbon sinks and leading to massive soil erosion. Areas once fertile and temperate fell to sun-scorched rock. Rising temperatures and acidity destroyed marine ecosystems, collapsing fish stocks. The world struggled to phase in vertical farming and move populations into arcologies. Perhaps they would have succeeded, if they'd had more time. But each new storm or drought or flood or famine or fire came on with vengeful rapidity, adding to the burden and reducing the strength to bear it.
In the summer of 2086, the tropics, home to nearly a third of Earth's population, became uninhabitably hot for a span of several weeks. Nations to the north and south strained to take in the refugees in addition to caring for their own people. It was a sign of things to come. The off world colonies too were expected to carry some of the burden. Waves of new colonist were sent out to every body. However, as the extent that the disaster would inevitable reach eventually dawned on people, they realized the terrible truth, though few accepted it: there was not enough to spare for climate refugees. One way or another, most of humanity was doomed.
Mars was the first to run short of compassion for the dying Earth. The Martians had little love for distant Earth, which governed them with disinterest and distain. And besides that, Hellas Planitia was near its carrying capacity, and could not comfortably support any more inhabitants. A spate of refugee massacres in 2087 snowballed into all out revolt across all fourteen colonies. Earth would send a few token forces to try and regain control, but in practice Mars withdrew from system-wide affairs in that year. Certain Belt colonies would follow suit, seeing the Earthan collapse as a disease to be quarantined. The Vesti Cossacks, Ceresian Sikhs, and Pallasian Christians formed a pact pledged to resisting invasion and immigration from Earth. Titan refused to even acknowledge Earthan communiques.
After similar nativist sympathies started cropping up on Mercury, Venus, and Luna, Earth responded with force, sending heavily armed occupation forces to every major city from Earth orbit to the surface of Mercury, and launching a war to win back the Belt. These efforts strained the diminishing strength of Earth and those of the colonies, but still they did not provide enough aid. As the sub-polar nations fought desperately to sustain the ever growing flood of refugees, some of them started to balk. In 2090, England, Norway, Iceland, and Switzerland issued a joint statement that they would take in no more immigrants. Argentina, New Zealand, Australia, Nenetistan, Chukotka, Yakutia, and the Canadian Province of Nunavut each affirmed shortly afterwards. The other sub-polar countries and the vanishing tropical ones were livid. Sold on the idea that it was the duty of all countries able to take in as many refugees as possible, were convicted that the nativist coalition was condemning millions to death just to maintain their own standards of luxury.
It all came to a head when England torpedoed a ship of refugees in the channel. The event was the flashpoint for a war against the nativists. The fire of war spread instantly to those colonies that were still accepting refugees, giving birth to the most destructive conflict humanity had ever seen. half a billion died of climate chaos and massacres in the first three months of conflict, and the losses off of Earth were just as extreme. With populations dying off and critical infrastructure being destroyed, a few of the nations of Earth resolved to end the war as quickly as possible, and saw no alternative to tactical nuclear strikes. And of course, when this stared, it could never be undone. So many secure decades after the Cold War, the nuclear holocaust came in 2091.
After that exchange, there was little to fight over, and little to fight with. What was left of Earth could do little to prepare for the nuclear winter that followed, as debris blocked out the sun for three years. After the thaw, the Earth's temperature rose sharply before settling into a gentle upward curve. But by then, the damage was done. Future generations estimated that there were twelve million humans left alive on Earth. Of those, most lived in barely habitable regions as herdsmen, subsistence farmers, or hunter-gatherers. Others lived in the far northern and southern "civilized" regions, where rudimentary states still existed, at least in some cases. The lucky ones lived in the few arcologies that had survived the war, and lived withdrawn from the world in their self-sufficient mini-ecosystems. The rest of the system too, regressed, and the human species and all its works died back. It was a new age of ruin and loss. It was known as the Quiet Eon.
Humanity, once so serene in their assurance of their empire over matter, had fallen.
Comments: 27
ChrisY-DA [2020-12-11 08:07:38 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
xlander684 [2018-07-22 03:49:14 +0000 UTC]
It'd be really cool to see a political map of this new Earth
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
grisador [2017-09-12 23:22:45 +0000 UTC]
Great work there; are the colonies survived and/or have plans to recolonize the any important parts of Earth ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
K9theXV [2017-07-06 03:13:05 +0000 UTC]
Damn, that's depressing. However, do things get better (As in Humanity reclaiming their empire over matter) after the Quiet Eon?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AlexanderAbelard In reply to K9theXV [2017-07-08 18:06:33 +0000 UTC]
That's actually what I intended this series to be about all along. Was this question prompted by the listed sources and publishing house?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
K9theXV In reply to AlexanderAbelard [2017-07-13 14:45:30 +0000 UTC]
Ah, so this alternate history is a tale about the hubris of humanity then. Makes sense.
Sorry if this comes across as stupid, but I'm not sure what you mean by the "listed sources and publishing house" comment. I'm not trying to start any unnecessary beefs with you or anything like that, I'm just wondering if that was either a joke, rhetorical statement or something else.
But anyways, keep up the good work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AlexanderAbelard In reply to K9theXV [2017-07-17 04:28:57 +0000 UTC]
Actually no, the collapse is a device to make put Earth on equal footing with the rest of the system much sooner than it would be otherwise and to inject a little more creative freedom. Chill, the bit at the bottom right is just foreshadowing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
K9theXV In reply to AlexanderAbelard [2017-07-22 23:26:45 +0000 UTC]
Alright then. If the collapse is meant to put Earth on the same level as Mars, Venus and the rest, I look forward to seeing what a post collapse society would look like.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
123456789JD [2017-07-01 15:16:18 +0000 UTC]
But given current weather systems and rainfall patterns, how did the deserts spread so far so quickly?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AlexanderAbelard In reply to 123456789JD [2017-07-03 05:30:03 +0000 UTC]
The clathrate gun effect made sure that the weather and rainfall went haywire pretty much immediately. Plus the brief nuclear winter described made sure that everything at didn't die of heat died of cold, meaning that there weren't even any hot and dry loving species left after the world thawed out and became hot again to keep the all important soil in place.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Esha-Nas [2017-06-30 16:43:43 +0000 UTC]
While I'm not as optimistic about the spread of Humanity by 2100 - I do think we'll have self sufficient Lunar or Martian colonies at the least - I like the general map as a whole. I saw another map like this years ago, and sadly it seems we're due for one big collapse, without Titanite bugs. At least I'll be old or dead.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AlexanderAbelard In reply to Esha-Nas [2017-06-30 19:14:49 +0000 UTC]
I make a few assumptions. Like that a little known theory promising a perfect propulsion method will turn out to work. Plus prior to this the population of the colonies accounted for just 0.11% of humanity.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Viorp [2017-06-30 12:27:40 +0000 UTC]
When people amplify all the bad things about a hotter climate but ignore all the benefits --___--
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Whachamacallit1 In reply to Viorp [2017-06-30 13:43:23 +0000 UTC]
We've already experienced most of the possible benefits of a hotter climate, and the negative effects are only increasing. See the increasing droughts and floods, the increasing number of refugees, and the growing deadly heatwaves. While we have benefited from shorter winters, it's now becoming debilitating because so many of our crops are reliant on predictable weather, and with the decline in winter comes increasingly erratic weather. The question is can we limit the amount of warming so that the future is just a bit painful instead of catastrophic.
While I don't know how much warming this scenario entitles, I imagine it's around 7-10 Celsius warmer that the preindustrial average. At that point, the positives have been so grossly outweighed by the negatives that there's barely any benefits left. The only positives are that the poles are pretty temperate, but that doesn't help when soil is nonexistent and ice sheets would be in full-blown collapse mode. Everything else is Permo-Triassic levels of terribleness.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Viorp In reply to Whachamacallit1 [2017-06-30 13:59:22 +0000 UTC]
Climate change has nothing to do with refugees though, islam has... seriously... climate change?
If the temperature rose by 10C... the poles would be -40C instead of -50C.
Instead the water level would rise flooding the Sahara creating a new massive area for agriculture simmilar with the Australian desert.
The higher temperatures would also let us use Siberia and Cannada massive plots of land for farming. Which noiw are to cold to be of any use.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
AlexanderAbelard In reply to Viorp [2017-06-30 20:20:04 +0000 UTC]
There are three main issues: the first is the speed at which the warming happens. Given 15,000 years to adapt, the ecosystems of the world would be much better off than shown. However, given only 15 years everything will either wilt, die, and burn, causing all the soil to be eroded away in hot climates, or be inundated with meltwater, rot, and die, causing all the soil to be eroded away in the taiga or tundra. The other issue is that just warming the planet isn't the all there is. Warming the planet would disrupt ocean currents and make the weather more erratic. Warming the planet by 10 degrees could lead to heatwaves of plus 20 or 25 degrees every few years.
Apart from just the warming, this scenario includes secondary man-made effects, principly that nuclear war destroys humanity's capacity to build infrastructure to mitigate the effects, and that nuclear winter (a hotly contested issue in of itself; we know that it can happen, but not exactly how) cause a sort of "one-two punch" that further disrupts both humans and the natural environment.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Viorp In reply to AlexanderAbelard [2017-06-30 20:30:26 +0000 UTC]
Well, in the scenarion that makes sense.
But if we talk real life. We have very advanced gene manipulation techniques. We could easily create GMO based ecosystems to cope with the chnaging climate.
Ocean currents could also be somewhat kept slave with technology.
Not to mention that for teperature to go up 10C at the current speed we'd need 400-500 years.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AlexanderAbelard In reply to Viorp [2017-07-01 03:41:19 +0000 UTC]
That's a bit optimistic, and it would be catastrophically expensive to implement and maintain, but that depends on how far into the future you want to go. If we're talking warming sans clathrate gun (and at what point that happens and how violently it happens is anyone's guess) then yes, that really serious warming would be pushed pretty far into the future. However, atmospheric dynamics is one of the most poorly understood areas of modern science, which is what makes global warming so terrifying, and why I like to assume the worst, just to be safe.
As an aside, we have genuinely no clue how global warming will interact with the fact that the next ice age is 1000 years overdue, which is also frightening.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Viorp In reply to AlexanderAbelard [2017-07-01 09:08:09 +0000 UTC]
Let's hope no next ice-age comes, because that would be catastrophic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Esha-Nas In reply to Viorp [2017-06-30 16:40:38 +0000 UTC]
The lands that'll inundated by rising water level in the Sahara are worthless salt pans that'll be devoid of life. At best you can use them to make electricity. Even if you made a total, green Sahara, that'll mean a desert Amazon in turn down the road. All of these concepts have already been discussed decades ago: Atlantropa, Mega-Lake Chad and Lake Congo projects, the Qattara 'Sea', the 'Tunisian Sea' (of which most isn't under sea level anyway).
Yes, it'll open up Siberia and Canada, as you see in the image above. It burns everything else, meaning that everyone will scramble to that new land. Not to mention the methane deposits that'll be freed in the process....
Nothing in this universe comes without a cost; save maybe the Oberth Effect.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Arminius1871 [2017-06-30 06:08:00 +0000 UTC]
Omg that story about lifeforms from Titan was really amazing, I enjoyed reading it thanks!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Meerkat92 [2017-06-30 03:53:35 +0000 UTC]
Yikes. Nice map, though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0