Comments: 11
pling79 [2009-02-21 18:38:28 +0000 UTC]
Kjempe fint!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lokzaza [2008-08-02 23:02:01 +0000 UTC]
you should be aware that the Greek partheons and monuments appear so perfect in pictures because they use slighly curvy lines (no more than 6-7 hexagesimal degrees). in other words, the perspective isn't right.
also the compositional contrast between fantasy(contour trees) and the edges of the building strike me as a misfit, but otherwise an intriguing style
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gringa87 [2007-07-19 05:30:21 +0000 UTC]
Unbelievable. How long did this take you?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adrian87 In reply to Gringa87 [2007-07-21 22:51:12 +0000 UTC]
a few hours ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Adrian87 In reply to pinkly [2006-04-14 20:43:04 +0000 UTC]
Thanks!
Ionic columns actually ^^ Doric temples are the most beautiful, but the Corinthian and Ionic columns are finer..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pinkly In reply to Adrian87 [2006-04-14 22:56:37 +0000 UTC]
I get doric and ionic mixed up. ):
I try to remember which is the really plain one, and which had the problems with the corners.
Corinthian is my favourite though. ♫
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kiteh-sama [2005-12-21 17:01:45 +0000 UTC]
I can see that you put alot of work into this picture. It is still a little bit sketchy, but I believe that sometimes the sketchiness actually adds to the overall look of the picture. This is very true of your picture. It has a sort of elegance and coordination that set lines or color might take away from it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0