Comments: 15
MrScootyPants [2004-05-31 05:00:24 +0000 UTC]
Now the boys overseas know what they're fighting for.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rondeaux [2004-05-30 22:30:07 +0000 UTC]
Your model looks a very sweet girl with no vices, no bad temper, all angelic. Of course you can't tell by appearances, but I'd like to meet her.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zzyzzx In reply to Rondeaux [2004-06-02 05:02:01 +0000 UTC]
yes, she is a very cool girl.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rondeaux In reply to zzyzzx [2004-06-02 05:33:22 +0000 UTC]
I envy you so much, although I am married to the most wonderful woman in the world. I'd like to just take a couple of photos of your models for practice.....you know what I mean?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zzyzzx In reply to Rondeaux [2004-06-02 15:53:15 +0000 UTC]
none of them are professional models. but if you live close to Newport BEach, CA, i could ask.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rondeaux In reply to zzyzzx [2004-06-02 21:34:07 +0000 UTC]
I live in Australia, far far far away. But thanks anyhow. You are just so lucky to have those wonderful friends willing to pose wo beautifully for you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
shatterdrose [2004-05-30 16:06:08 +0000 UTC]
It looks a little overexposed to me, the highlights on her face are too white. Maybe Increase the shutter by a third or half stop would make this much better. You might even be able to fix It In photoshop using Levels.
Were you using any type of softbox or umbrella with this shot? My only other suggestion Is that If you were planning on printing this, you got to close to the edge ofthe frames. On a standard 8x10 print, It has a 2:3 ratio while this shot will have to printed at a 3:4. Usually when I do portraits, I leave a space at top and bottom from where I want my subject to hit the print edge. Cause unfourtunetly, the 2:3 ratio Is still popular among frames and prints.
Otherwise, I really like the Idea and pose, she looks like she's really enjoying herself and that reflects on the overall meaning of this shot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
joseyung [2004-05-30 13:45:17 +0000 UTC]
stupid americans doing stupid things
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zzyzzx In reply to joseyung [2004-05-30 19:58:30 +0000 UTC]
yes, we are
👍: 0 ⏩: 0