HOME | DD
Yudaev — White Landscape. 2004
#2004 #abstraction #accumulation #city #flow #geometry #landscape #moving #painting #river #sky #wall #watercolor #yuri #акварель #абстракция #racei #юрий #yudaev #геометрия #юдаев #рачей
Published: 2014-11-09 12:47:44 +0000 UTC; Views: 994; Favourites: 35; Downloads: 14
Redirect to original
Description
Watercolor on paper, 41 × 29 cm.
ABSTRACTION
Artist's Collection.
Related content
Comments: 10
beautiful.
the abstraction,
the collage-like quality,
the transition from solid to ephemereal.
i like it very much!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I love this one - I just love the look of it - the ''feel '' of it .excellent !!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yuri, very interesting, elementar interpretation of the spheres. It awakes some art of abstract-poetic
thinking-feeling
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thank you so much, Wieslaw ! This very elegantly expressed estimation, so far as I can judge.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hmmm ... I don't understand why the lower part of the pic with those lots of squares was necessary ... I think without them, the pic also stood on its legs. anyway, a good work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Cutting off with scissors the white field from the Malevich' square, you may get a small Reinhardt (but for what ?).
Attempt to reach of understanding of an author's thought isn't better ?
Thank you anyway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If you mentioned it, I must say that I don't like Malevich's squares much, especially his mono-coloured squares and similar shapes; and even lesser I like Reinhardt. I think the black square is a dead-end of art. It can be considered to be art, and I understand sometimes lesser is better. But this opens lethal problems and leads to consequences which one can hardly face. If the minimalist wing of suprematism-like painters were consequent when they say "lesser is better", they should paint nothing. Not just white canvases, but really nothing. It is the death of art of course.
I think this problem can't be handled by arguing over "how much minimalism does good?", it is the problem of harmony and composition. Of course you can say you like disharmony, or that you like a concept of harmony of your own, but I have the equal right to say that I like my own concepts of harmony. And into that concept, texture difference without solid transition from a rectangle field into a more blurred field of levitating triangles and circles, doesn't fit in. But this is a question of senses of tastes, of course not an absolute decideable question.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I like the final part of your discourse.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And I like your piece, as i said above, so don't get my "criticism" wrong; just don't understand a part of it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0