HOME | DD

woweek — Logotype01 Updated: Logotype

Published: 2008-10-24 15:32:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 2183; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 62
Redirect to original
Description Updated

Hello mates!
I think it's time to improve my skills
I know that my "logotypes" (as said my mate Arpad ) are kinda hard to read. Somtimes they are eyecatcing, but always unreadable as hell!
So Since the present moment I've decided to share my works with you with codename in "Logotype№" format inspite of real name. I decided to do it to get objective critique from you about readabitity of logotype.
So let's start guys! Is it readable? And what does it say?

Objective critique is very welcome! Don't be shy.

Description: For a client. Logotype for real estate investment company.

Copyright 2008 Vladimir Ilnitzki, October

P.s. And i know that i need to improve my skills in English!
Related content
Comments: 40

LSP-C [2013-11-17 23:13:53 +0000 UTC]

muy buen logo

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cfdesign [2009-07-29 14:43:39 +0000 UTC]

i like the yellow's R better
yellow R + red rest = win
+fav

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

darkslide7 [2009-05-15 16:17:51 +0000 UTC]

readilbly and cool..
but i thought it was a clothing brand

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thinkLuke [2009-03-26 08:18:41 +0000 UTC]

CAESAR - and its cool!
maybe just spread the text under the logo across the length of it???

keep them coming

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Neoconvoy [2008-10-31 00:56:54 +0000 UTC]

Caesar!!!

(My name is Cesar A)

Great logos man!

I like the first more, the second is good too, but that "s" looks like a SS bolt

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xnoleet [2008-10-28 06:47:26 +0000 UTC]

Another hit!

Readable and Artistic; companies should be more edgy in that sense .

Great work!.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

woweek In reply to xnoleet [2008-10-28 07:02:34 +0000 UTC]

Thank You very much! I think this one will be great for clothing brand or something like this. I should to do more classic variant

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

seloh [2008-10-27 08:09:06 +0000 UTC]

These are very readable but maybe they are a bit to "modern" for a real estate investment company ...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

woweek In reply to seloh [2008-10-27 08:58:28 +0000 UTC]

Yes. I agree. Thank You for comment!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MatyasSvejdik [2008-10-26 21:47:20 +0000 UTC]

Better

Much more readable and "R" and "S" are nicer... (sorry to dualform that I talk about letters separetly )...

The whole thing is nicer... More compact...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

superbonder [2008-10-25 20:37:17 +0000 UTC]

caesar!

very good!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

woweek In reply to superbonder [2008-10-25 20:40:50 +0000 UTC]

You right!! Thank You mate! Appreciate your comment

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

uphique [2008-10-25 16:34:14 +0000 UTC]

cool..
instant fave

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

woweek In reply to uphique [2009-03-26 10:56:21 +0000 UTC]

Thank You man! Appreciate!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dave-Random [2008-10-25 10:32:12 +0000 UTC]

F**k legibilty. It's art man, Art! : )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

woweek In reply to Dave-Random [2008-10-25 12:02:30 +0000 UTC]

But i think clients don't think so!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dave-Random In reply to woweek [2008-10-25 13:56:29 +0000 UTC]

True. I agree with the comment about techno artist vs. companies

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fade319 [2008-10-25 05:50:15 +0000 UTC]

I think one of the biggest problems is how the "C" extends too much and how it's connected with the left side of "A," making it look like a G.

Great work, though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

prld [2008-10-25 05:16:41 +0000 UTC]

Looks great as usual

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

brilliancy [2008-10-24 20:50:26 +0000 UTC]

love it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

raw-food [2008-10-24 20:27:33 +0000 UTC]

it depends on your clients mate. if you make a logotype for a minimal techno dj or whatever, I dont think he cares too much about readability. if its for a company, they most likely care.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mD-06 [2008-10-24 18:40:01 +0000 UTC]

ceasar but it could also be ciesar

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MatyasSvejdik [2008-10-24 17:58:22 +0000 UTC]

This is nice but Id also say that it is hard to read... The problematic letter is A... Cause it as a lot of "holes" inside itself... it is totally different to the others... For example "R" and "A"... If you look only at these two then you will see...

Ok, letter after letter... C is good, just normal... A is perfect but different (definetly the nicest one)... E and R are bit complicated and bolt... Not sure about these ... And S... S is a bit nazi

So after all Im not sure about this one...

Guess you got much better logotypes...

Sorry for this critique mate, still i may criticize but my logotypes are full of bugs...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dualform In reply to MatyasSvejdik [2008-10-24 18:31:31 +0000 UTC]

C is great A is crap E is good S is bad


well lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MatyasSvejdik In reply to dualform [2008-10-24 18:50:34 +0000 UTC]

lol?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dualform [2008-10-24 17:36:29 +0000 UTC]

type monster!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

woweek In reply to dualform [2008-10-24 17:55:02 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

dualform In reply to woweek [2008-10-24 18:22:21 +0000 UTC]

может сделаешь какую-нибудь прикольную фразу в крутой типографике. Я бы обыграл формой? collab i mean lol!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dualform In reply to woweek [2008-10-24 18:20:02 +0000 UTC]

хохотун говоришь?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kochiz [2008-10-24 16:46:55 +0000 UTC]

tought i t would be more for a casino or something like that
i digg it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kwedo [2008-10-24 16:29:46 +0000 UTC]

if its caesar - should c connect with an a?
anyways great stuff

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Master-Bryon [2008-10-24 16:11:46 +0000 UTC]

figured it out eventually, caesar

but at first glance i thought it said giesar

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MrSuma [2008-10-24 16:08:28 +0000 UTC]

Glesar

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

woweek In reply to MrSuma [2008-10-26 10:54:15 +0000 UTC]

maybe "СЛЕSAR"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MrSuma In reply to woweek [2008-10-26 21:05:25 +0000 UTC]

вот на первом caesar уже читаеться

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

helsesoestera In reply to MrSuma [2008-10-24 23:22:23 +0000 UTC]

lol
seriously?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MrSuma In reply to helsesoestera [2008-10-25 11:28:58 +0000 UTC]

yep
G than "\" shaped L
E S A R

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

D3STRUCTO In reply to MrSuma [2008-11-05 13:54:40 +0000 UTC]

agreed..
yellow version does look a lot like a "G" rather than a "C"
all in all good logo, but again like mentioned probably a bit too artistic for a corporate real estate company..

my two cents

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kntz [2008-10-24 15:46:15 +0000 UTC]

it took me a little, but i figured it out. caesar.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pValentin [2008-10-24 15:36:09 +0000 UTC]

Caesar?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0