HOME | DD

wibblethefish — TF2: Personal Pyro

Published: 2011-07-09 23:16:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 3895; Favourites: 81; Downloads: 24
Redirect to original
Description I've had this pyro scanned in since March I just never got around to doing anything with it, until today that is. Nothing too special, just basic colours.

This pyro is done up in the same items ~SniperBunny and I tend to affix to our pyro, although not featured is the flaregun that I suspect I use far more than the flamethrower.

TF2 (c) Valve
Related content
Comments: 14

Jazon19 [2011-07-23 04:43:38 +0000 UTC]

I say! Rather!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TWISTEDPYRO8 [2011-07-15 06:04:33 +0000 UTC]

the whiskered gentleman is the most fashionable thing on the battlefield

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Thebest91238 [2011-07-12 06:36:50 +0000 UTC]

SPAH CHECK!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SnipeTheSorrow [2011-07-10 02:32:33 +0000 UTC]

Hm, quite.

Getting uses out of those brushes I made, I see?

Epic as always, darl.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lypten [2011-07-09 23:33:42 +0000 UTC]

I want the Whiskered Gentleman so hard...I jelly
I so jelly!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wibblethefish In reply to Lypten [2011-07-09 23:44:42 +0000 UTC]

It is the finest facial attire any man nay, human can enjoy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lypten In reply to wibblethefish [2011-07-10 00:32:06 +0000 UTC]

It is!
It would go smashingly good with my Vintage Merryweather!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CajunPyro [2011-07-09 23:20:17 +0000 UTC]

Ez gud

but it needs more verbosity, Whiskered Gentleman

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wibblethefish In reply to CajunPyro [2011-07-09 23:26:12 +0000 UTC]

The Whiskered Gentleman Pyro needs not words to be superior. He knows he is, with every fibre of his being.

And thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

CajunPyro In reply to wibblethefish [2011-07-09 23:41:00 +0000 UTC]

What was I thinking? Questioning the unquestionable existance of The Whiskered Gentleman Pyro! I shall rethink my life as a stereotypically uneducated American and become British in admiration of the Pyro's facial attire and monacle (despite the fact that Romans were the first to use monacles way before the British in the 1700s)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wibblethefish In reply to CajunPyro [2011-07-09 23:44:07 +0000 UTC]

I did not know that, thank you for that nugget of information.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CajunPyro In reply to wibblethefish [2011-07-09 23:46:21 +0000 UTC]

Well, when you have boring history classes, those kinds of things just catch your mind in that moment while the rubbish slips by

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mr-Lobo In reply to wibblethefish [2011-07-09 23:27:22 +0000 UTC]

+1

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wibblethefish In reply to Mr-Lobo [2011-07-09 23:43:14 +0000 UTC]

Glad to see you agree, old bean.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0