Comments: 6
DreamingSentinel [2015-09-10 01:56:44 +0000 UTC]
I think you would benefit highly from travelling the world. It is easy to believe such things when truth is black and white, but what is truth, really? Is it something that society dictates? Did Gandhi beat his wife, molest children? Did Rasputin? Look deeper into who is it that says such things, and what would be their incentive to. At the time Gandhi was threatening strong industry powers in the first world countries through his revolution for a free India, so of course mainstream media (especially that of the English Empire) would be doing their best to discredit him to the public eye. They had a lot to lose (for an example of that, I recommend you watch The Wolf of Wall St )— especially Alexander Lebedev, who was a billionaire at the time of that article’s publishing in "The Independent" (which he owned).
At the same time, the Indian's had a lot to gain by making him look a saint. So, what really happened? Only Gandhi and his closest friends would know, and maybe not even then.
The bible is the words of humans writing for God. Although they may have been following their hearts and trying to create a better world, they were never referenced by common historians of that era. I have even heard theories going so far as to say that Jesus was a fiction created by the senate of Rome as a means to transfer their power before Julius disbanded them. Whether this is true or not, again, people can only guess (although it would be eerily similar to today's current manipulation of society by the media).
Look at the current Vatican and the pope (the Godfather III is a great, sad example of this); they've publicly apologised for atrocities committed in the past , but what's he doing signing this agenda? “[It’s] far, far more dangerous than Agenda 21 ever was, and it is a giant step forward into a one world system governed by bureaucratic control freaks.”- Michael Snyder
It’s just like Game of Thrones (which is part of the stories success); plots within counterplots. Everyone has incentives, reasons, motivations, and because of it the pages of history are as blurred as the muddied waters of the Nile.
Please don’t take my posting this as an attack, as I don’t mean it as such. I write this because I can see that you’re a smart person trying to follow their beliefs in what they know is right, and help others along the way. The universe is a beautiful place, and there perhaps is a higher power (although evolution explains the perfection of life, it does not explain that of atoms, or things as we understand them now which do not apply). But you have to question everything.
Maybe God inspired you to write this so that I would respond in course.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WhIppIng-b0y In reply to DreamingSentinel [2015-09-11 06:39:02 +0000 UTC]
Oh no, I'm not offended, I'm actually pleased that you are actually commenting and not just disregarding this. I'm just a person trying to obey God, thank you though.
Although yes, we can't really know for sure about the things that have happened, I think that some of the things we hear may have credence. The info about Gandhi for example, I would've likely wrote it off if it wasn't for all the things surrounding it. The various sources I looked at myself showed quotes of Gandhi's letters, testimonies from those who worked with Gandhi, feminists in India who were complaining about how Gandhi treated certain females around him, and other such things. I know this all very well could be just some very intricate and well executed plan to mar Gandhi's image, however slight, but it all seems a little too suspicious for me. I know all too well about people with secret agendas trying to change the truth, but something must happen if there are those trying to change what had happened. I'm faced with that time and time again in my own faith, trying to see what's real, what's fake, and so on. I however try to find the best answers I can to the best of my abilities, and I also pray to my God that he would lead my searches, and feel that I can get a good idea of certain things.
The thing about the bible is that even though yes, man physically are the ones who sat down and put the ink on the paper and sometimes even wrote their own words, that I and a great many believe that God directs all of our actions. God, the Lord of Abraham, speaks in the bible of how he used people who didn't believe in him for his own purposes. He used the Assyrians to conquer his chosen people, the Jews, for being wicked even though he made it clear that he'd also judge the Assyrians for their own wickedness and pride. biblehub.com/kjv/isaiah/10.htm (Verses 5-19) and in the same way, he uses those who believe in him to do his good works, including the bible. As for those historians, remember that the church faced great persecution, many of the most ardent biblical scholars can't even find a transcript dating any earlier that 400AD (Don't quote me there on the exact date, but it was close to those times if not on those times.) does that mean the church simply didn't exist before those times? Potentially, but I don't believe it to be. If the romans burned anything that had to do with Christ or Christians, it's very likely they burned the historians' accounts concerning Christ as well. It could go either way from our viewpoint, I know, as it was a very long time ago and we can't truly know what happened, but as I said before, we who believe believe our God is Omnipotent, Omnipresent, and Omniscient. "For we walk by faith, not by sight." (2 Cor. 5:7)
What if it's all just a lie? A fabrication? Or at the very least partially made up for someone else's agenda? Then I believe that if that is the case, I would've lived a life trying to find a perfect ideal and trying to do good for the world according to my belief, and if there is no afterlife, then I feel that still would've been worth it. If it is true however, if there is a man named Jesus who died for my sins, and I don't believe, I would've been tricked out of eternal salvation, so I see it as a win-win situation regardless. But I earnestly believe the bible to be God's word written by man but spoken or inspired by God. I question everything I hear of man, but God is not a liar, lies are contrary to him. I find it kinda funny that you asked what truth was, and I believe God is truth, and I seek him as best as I'm given. I know this may sound rather illogical to those who don't believe, but it isn't logic that faith and spirituality in general is based on. Man are always liars, I question anything I hear from a human (even those things I list I accept that they may be false, but I put them anyway since I think there's more compelling info to the contrary) even things like the theory of evolution has too many lies, suspicious things, and flaws around it for me to even consider it real that humans came from single celled organisms, or at least in the way the theories suggest. I believe the bible was put in my hands by God and therefore I should trust him. That's why I am quoting the bible so much, and is why I am what many would call a "bible thumper"
I'm glad you are being more open about this, I am starting to believe very much that God indeed intended for us to meet and have this discussion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DreamingSentinel In reply to WhIppIng-b0y [2015-09-14 01:22:43 +0000 UTC]
I appreciate the way you think, you have a keen mind. True, as there was great incentives on both sides of the story. But rather than being a "intricate and well executed plan", I see it more as lots of different, capable individuals trying to change the outcome of events to suit themselves. There would also be a lot of social stigma involved for people to say or not say things within their friend circles and such (think of modern-day celebrities and everything that can be found around them). But you're points are valid
Many different churches existed before those times (and still do), but not the new testament. Referring to Jesus and the historians of that era was more to point out the possible motivations mortals would have had to write The Bible and hopefully lead you to question their intentions. I believe in free will as much as I do destiny; that we have choice and may deviate from our paths, but in the end what will be and what should be will always be. I think the universe constantly guides us towards happiness and our fates at every opportunity, and that it loves compassion. But I also believe that our perceptions interact with these things and the way we lead our lives, and eventually too, their ends.
I don't know if your use of the word here is referring to my reference of the 2030 Agenda or not (that's more a law to pass a world government and take away the rights of people globally), but your reasoning is a good one. It's nice to hear that you're following your heart and morality, but along the same line of thought, what about all the other religions? Many of them have laws which contradict the others, which means that if any one of them is actually true there would most likely be a breach somewhere.
The theory of evolution strikes a chord within me. I think it explains a lot of the magnificence in the realms we see around us, and if there is a God, would only give them all the more of my reverence for the perfection of the universe. What we know now, we can only glimpse at, and yet it's made all the more wondrous for that we cannot truly understand it's complexity. It would be a shame to see such beauty simplified to that which we can comprehend.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WhIppIng-b0y In reply to DreamingSentinel [2015-09-15 00:19:27 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, I also find your open mind to be refreshing
Indeed, many churches did exist before Christianity, but at the same time they didn't. Christianity is actually a name that wasn't conceived until many many years after the people who would come to be called "Christians" started their church. The church members were called such because they went around the world preaching the 'good news' salvation of Christ's sacrifice for our sins. In that regard, Christianity didn't exist before certain ancient religions. However, the very first Christians were members of a different church, or rather synagogue. Jesus Christ, the very namesake of the religion, was a Jew, his 12 disciples were Jews, and most of the first believers were Jews. Judaic beliefs go back even before the Jews were even a people. I also believe that we have free will and a destiny at the same time, I believe we have the free will to choose what we will, whether Jesus or Gandhi or Muhammad or what not, but I also believe in destiny, since I believe my God is in control of what we do. I've heard testimonies of people who were completely atheistic, but have had their spiritual lives turned around due to some miracle they witnessed or some other experience which may not have neccesarily been "supernatural" but was powerful enough to convert them. I think their is a plan for all, whether they choose one direction or the other.
Uh...I'm sorry, but I'd haven't had a chance to look at all of your links I was very much meaning to, but my interenet was acting up and I couldn't open up more than one page, and I forgot about them. I'll try and check it now as my internet has been getting a bit better now, but I don't really know what 2030 agenda is (other than what you just told me of course). As for other religions, the bible says that the only way to God in heaven in through Jesus, unfortunately meaning the others won't get anyone saved according to my religion, which is why we are told to spread the gospel. The Judaic religion has many prophecies and promises of the God of Abraham, one in particular being called "Messiah" a prophet who would lead the Jews and their nation to freedom and would teach them all the ways of God. Jesus was this Messiah, but not all believed God so not all the Jews believed Jesus, and thus was the religion sort of split. Those who believed in Christ, and those who didn't. In many ways Christianity can be considered an offshoot of Judaism. They're not entirely the same, even in a Jew belives Jesus was the promised Messiah, but they should be side by side. Now Judaic beliefs go back even further than even before there was a nation callled Israel or a people called the Jews as I believe I've already mentioned. The beliefs of the God of Abraham go back so far, that even the events of the book of Genesis are mentioned in ancient texts from what are believed to be humanities first civilizations such as Egypt and in Sumerian texts like the epic of Gilgamesh (was it Sumerian? I may be mistaken) as it has tales of events of things that happened from the ancient times. What if it's wrong or fabricated? How could events from such a long time ago be accurately told? I only believe because it's in my God's holy Word.
True, according to the bible, even if the theory of evolution was true, it would still be God who had done it, I don't think it would give him greater glory. In the older world, explorers from europe came back from africa claiming to have seen unicorns, now these unicorns happened to actually be rhinos, a far cry from the common ancient depiction of a unicorn, yet they were mistaken nonetheless. I suppose in any ancient people they wouldn't know what else to call microorganisms (they wouldn't know what those were) other than dirt since they're so small and everywhere(if they could see them that is, not possible by the naked human eye), so I think it's possible that when the bible says that Adam was made from the dirt, that it could've been micro-organisms in some way, but I don't believe it to be. The name Adam comes from the word Adama which means earth or dirt. I think it was literally meaning God turned dirt to a living being, which to me seems more a grand feat than using already present living organisms (which he still would've created I suppose, so just as grand in that sense) I believe the theory of evolution doesn't directly oppose religious belief, but it does show some strange things about it. Many times people use carbon dating to get how old some bones or such are, and especially in certain areas concerning the theory of evolution, but carbon dating was laughed at from the start for its complete unreliability, putting thousands of years difference between two parts of the same frozen animal they found (a mammoth I think it was) and a lot of other evidence shows that it's impossible for the Earth to be millions of years old as suggested. Also the thought that we share common ancestry with monkeys is bonkers, there's no concrete fossil evidence suggesting this. I personally find the theory of evolution to be the simplification of things, as it tries to make things seem as though they were created because of gravity behind it all. I know that they get some things right, the ancient earth was in no way the same as the one we know today, and we can only speculate as to how things worked back then as the bible doesn't say yea or nay to very many things. Christian scientists believe that the dinosaurs did exist due to certain parts in the bible, but they think they walked with man rather than 65mil years ago due to certain things like Egyptian and other ancient civilizations wall paintings, carvings, etc. Many theories involved with evolution may very well be true to some extent, as they don't necessarily go against the biblical facts, but some of the bigger ideas, like us sharing ancestry with primates, doesn't make any sense.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1