HOME | DD

whathisname In reply to ??? [2010-12-19 13:37:57 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! A wonderful collection!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to weltengang [2008-12-14 10:18:56 +0000 UTC]

Danke!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to weltengang [2008-08-04 13:04:57 +0000 UTC]

Indeed

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to soulrescue [2008-01-12 10:16:56 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to omni-nominis [2008-01-12 10:16:47 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to lucidscarlet [2007-12-27 12:09:09 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to elisabethaBathory [2007-06-16 20:26:16 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to AngelFromDarkForest [2007-06-11 11:08:55 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to luciolia [2007-05-22 13:43:28 +0000 UTC]

indeed.

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to robherr [2007-03-16 16:40:15 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad you liked it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to a-sullen-girl [2007-03-07 14:35:44 +0000 UTC]

Sometimes there's beauty in tradegy... all torn from their roots. Waiting for summer, and the end..

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to SilverFirefly [2007-02-27 15:32:19 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to CBJJBC [2007-02-25 08:12:48 +0000 UTC]

Shouldn't a diptych consist of two parts?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CBJJBC In reply to whathisname [2007-02-25 11:43:50 +0000 UTC]

the definition of a diptych is 1+1=2
but we accept triptych, animated picutres and so on.
so your quadriptych will be welcome by our community

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

whathisname In reply to CBJJBC [2007-02-25 12:02:44 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad to hear that

I shall send the formal submission- and join-note

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CBJJBC In reply to whathisname [2007-02-25 12:23:38 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

whathisname In reply to CBJJBC [2007-02-25 16:14:01 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to citizenfour [2007-02-23 14:33:43 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to katsaridas [2007-02-22 14:35:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks a lot Thanos!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to enivrez-vous [2007-02-22 14:40:53 +0000 UTC]

Not yet actually. Just creative use of fluids on the lens filter and ps... I'm still working on the pinhole... It's harder than I first thought.

Thanks ms. newspaper

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

enivrez-vous In reply to whathisname [2007-02-22 22:46:13 +0000 UTC]

Hahaha, ms. newspaper? Don't spread it!

I'm waiting for some tin to get empty, so I can start its mutation.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

whathisname In reply to enivrez-vous [2007-02-23 11:11:38 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to Ezis [2007-02-22 14:44:42 +0000 UTC]

I agree about the frames. I thought they would be too dominating. On the other had they give an impression of looking through tiny holes. Once again I had to make a compromise.

Thanks a lot for the comment and especially for the critique!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ezis In reply to whathisname [2007-02-23 10:18:05 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I can agree about those tiny wholes
My pleasure !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to kuru93 [2007-02-22 14:54:21 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to kelliemarian [2007-02-22 14:52:38 +0000 UTC]

I put some cleaning-gel on the lens filter. It includes a lot of alcohol, so it didn't mind -20 degrees That created a little faded, nostagic look. Then I used ps to create the vingetting and to adjust them

Thanks for interest!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to rosilynclaire [2007-02-21 18:00:03 +0000 UTC]

me too

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to Jack-in-the-box [2007-02-21 17:59:49 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whathisname In reply to acoprules [2007-02-21 17:59:43 +0000 UTC]

Thank you a lot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0