HOME | DD
Wendel-Fragoso β Resting.
#anthrofemale #anthropomorphic #blood #boxe #boxeo #boxing #debby #deborah #furryart #furryfandom #furryfemale #mouthpiece #boxeadora #anthrocharacter #anthroboxing #boxingfemale #furryboxing #boxingfurry #boxingcat #headgear
Published: 2019-03-04 05:04:12 +0000 UTC; Views: 35775; Favourites: 460; Downloads: 128
Redirect to original
Description
Deborah in her most exuberant physical form, ready for the big challenges .Related content
Comments: 181
Fighting with this brazilian babe means death Wendel!!!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
I would do my best, but I think I'd be in the emergency room.
π: 0 β©: 0
Sim.
SΓ³ me dΓͺ um tempo, vou acionar o Seguro SaΓΊde Brasdesco corporativo, sΓ³ pra qualquer eventualidade....
π: 0 β©: 1
Β OK. Good lucky aaannd... Protect your teeth.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
She's going to face Deborah Kranz? Oh Boy
π: 0 β©: 1
This is my intention.
π: 0 β©: 0
Take these gloves, this head gear, this mouthguard, this groin protector, this shield, this wall...
π: 0 β©: 1
Looks awesome, Deborah so cool, stronger, and sexyΒ Β , always cool seeing the headgear on her, love it, the poor crushed opponent, but Debby being brutal in her fights is awesome, love the pic.
Tiffany Lords, Yang, Grace, Lopunny, or Penelope Kangeroo will so love to fight the New Stronger Deb.
π: 0 β©: 2
www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuL6cJβ¦
π: 0 β©: 0
FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!Β
We want blood!
π: 0 β©: 0
She looks really cool ! I bet she trained a lotΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
With a body like that, I'll always be the next!
π: 0 β©: 1
Well maybe, if I there is a chance to survive?
π: 0 β©: 1
Β I don't know.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
She's waiting a opponent, maybe you!!
Do wanna try?
π: 0 β©: 0
That bloody mouthpiece on the mat must mean that she brutally beat her previous opponent to a bloody pulp, huh?
π: 0 β©: 2
Yes, and it looks horrible.
π: 0 β©: 0
Please re-read your comments; specifically your responses to other people's comments and ask yourself: What makes you think that you are the supreme arbiter of how something should be drawn or what other people think of that art, and in what right are you in to tell the artist, in this case this work is a disappointment and to tell others they have bad taste?
Have you taken drawing classes? Have you studies how muscles work in people or even animals?
We all have our opinions so it's okay to not like something, but unless you actually do have a full contrusctive critique based on actual artistic and critical merits, while openly acknowledging it's your own opinion just as others have theirs, you probably shouldn't say stuff like this.
Blantly scolding other people on what they think of a work, or even the artist themself based on how you treat your own opinion as an objective truth only takes away your own credibility as a critique and creative entrepreneur.
Plus as far as I know in regards to "Those abs aren't natural!" and especially telling others to "Look at your own abs," another thing you should bare in mind is that not everybody's bodies are the same, particularly those who may not be athletes themselves, and even those who are also have differentiating body plans.
Oh and as for how abs not only should be drawn, but also how the muscles that fit in the abs are actuall placed...
π: 0 β©: 2
I faved them, thank you.
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh you're welcome. Sorry if there's any trouble btw.
π: 0 β©: 0
Kay. But my point still stands, don't treat your opinion like an objective truth, and force it down others.
π: 0 β©: 1
You just validated my objective criticism about how Deborah looks physically with this:
π: 0 β©: 1
You're right I did, but again not every athletic body is the same, and different artists have different techniques on drawing anatomy, particularly from a certain angle or perspective and drawn in a differing style.
But even then the whole point of the argument is instead of blatantly scolding people, you should try and have more integrity with your choice of words.
ex: "This is very nicely drawn, although I think the abs could use more improvement, here's this for reference." or when replying to someone's comment "Well I don't exactly agree, but whatever floats your boat man."
See the point of engaging in a conversation is all about integrity, you should have integrity when commenting an artist or another person; just as those other people may also have integrity.
π: 0 β©: 2
"You're right I did, but again not every athletic body is the same, and different artists have different techniques on drawing anatomy, particularly from a certain angle or perspective and drawn in a differing style."
And?
"But even then the whole point of the argument is instead of blatantly scolding people, you should try and have more integrity with your choice of words."
First of all, I did not scold the whole world. Technically, I only answered those comments that praised Deborah's new appearance too much, and decided to respond to those comments. And the thing is that there were only two responses plus the original comment, where I made my criticism towards the new appearance of Deborah, so it was practically not as many as you can see. Regarding the responses of those users (including you) to my original comment? That is another thing.
Second. What I had said in my original comment, still stands.
"ex: "This is very nicely drawn, although I think the abs could use more improvement, here's this for reference." or when replying to someone's comment "Well I don't exactly agree, but whatever floats your boat man.""
And?
"See the point of engaging in a conversation is all about integrity, you should have integrity when commenting an artist or another person; just as those other people may also have integrity."
I did it; read the original comment, please.
π: 0 β©: 1
"And?"
And, what exactly?
"First of all, I did not scold the whole world.Β Technically, I only answered those comments that praised Deborah's new appearance too much, and decided to respond to those comments.Β And the thing is that there were only two responses plus the original comment, where I made my criticism towards the new appearance of Deborah, so it was practically not as many as you can see.Β Regarding the responses of those users (including you) to my original comment?That is another thing."
I didn't say you scold the whold world, I was cautioning you to not scold people in general for what they like or dislike. Is that how you would like someone to treat you? And after reading those comments I didn't read anything that made it look like they praised it too much, just that they liked it, and that's okay. And even if there "Weren't as many" you should still take other people's feedback with a grain of salt.
Also, I may not have to make that big a deal of your original comment if that was posted before you responded to other people, while also trying to be fair with your criticism and not call it "a dissapointment" cause that in itself could very well insult the artist, and make you seem stuck up.
"And?"
Again, and what?
"I did it; read the original comment, please"
I did, and I'm sorry but it came off as stuck up. The whole point of what I'm trying to tell you from the begining is to be more attentive to what you say to other people.
π: 0 β©: 1
"And, what exactly?
"First of all, I did not scold the whole world.Β Technically, I only answered those comments that praised Deborah's new appearance too much, and decided to respond to those comments.Β And the thing is that there were only two responses plus the original comment, where I made my criticism towards the new appearance of Deborah, so it was practically not as many as you can see.Β Regarding the responses of those users (including you) to my original comment?That is another thing.""
I read the comments of those people, dude; I know what I read. And for the last time, I already told you that there were only two answers and nothing else. The next time you bring this to a standstill, knowing that there is nothing more to add, I will ignore it.
"Also, I may not have to make that big a deal of your original comment if that was posted before you responded to other people, while also trying to be fair with your criticism and not call it "a dissapointment" cause that in itself could very well insult the artist, and make you seem stuck up."
I think you understand what is happening here, I will tell you directly. This is a version of Deborah, and I have no problems with her overall appearance when it comes to dress. In regard to your physical appearance? Well, I already gave my opinion about it. And to clarify things even more; when an artist makes a new version of something or when his art changes that will bring some kind of controversy, whether one wants it or not, because it is normal that happens. Do you understand now?
""And?"
Again, and what?
"I did it; read the original comment, please"
I did, and I'm sorry but it came off as stuck up. The whole point of what I'm trying to tell you from the begining is to be more attentive to what you say to other people."
In other words, do not say anything negative, right?
π: 0 β©: 1
It's okay to share your opinion and what you like or don't like about it, but it's the manner of how you presented it that's the problem.
But whatever, I'm not continuing this conversation.
π: 0 β©: 1
Respect earned
π: 0 β©: 1
No problem
π: 0 β©: 0
Art and anatomy is still good. Regarding Deborah, at least she looks a bit attractive; that's something, i guess. Also, those abs do not look natural, it looks like he used steroids. In conclusion, she practically no longer looks attractive; what disappointment. Score: 5/10.
π: 0 β©: 3
| Next =>