HOME | DD

unusualsuspex β€” Discovery

#federation #star #starfleet #starship #trek
Published: 2014-12-13 11:10:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 4363; Favourites: 83; Downloads: 226
Redirect to original
Description Captain's Log StardateΒ 3846.7

While the landing party remain aboard the Raleigh, sensors have discovered elements of wreckage from what may be the aggressor. I am having these remains tractored into the hangar bay for further investigation. A transmission of our current situation has been dispatched to Starfleet Command. In the meantime, we are on maximum alert as the wreckage of the Raleigh drifts uncomfortably close to the edge of the Neutral Zone.

Constitution - Jason Lee
Mystery attacker (wreck) - James Basset
BG - Me
Related content
Comments: 29

CarbideRules [2022-02-13 01:22:19 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

unusualsuspex In reply to CarbideRules [2022-02-13 14:14:06 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

snate56 [2019-11-30 09:33:32 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Geoffryn [2017-04-03 06:42:19 +0000 UTC]

Actually, NCC-1700 is the USS Constitution's call number.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Car-54 [2015-12-08 03:48:46 +0000 UTC]

I have a bad feeling about this

(someone had to say it.)Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

unusualsuspex In reply to Car-54 [2015-12-08 07:11:06 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Car-54 In reply to unusualsuspex [2015-12-09 01:39:18 +0000 UTC]

I'm a fan of both Star Trek and Star Wars...along with the original Battlestar Galactica.Β 
I'll just say this. Don't underestimate the constitution class. (Size matters not)Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Hardcorev20 In reply to Car-54 [2017-11-10 03:48:38 +0000 UTC]

With a forward battery of eight phaser banks and six torpedo tubes? How hard is it not to be?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Patriot1776 [2015-03-20 22:34:28 +0000 UTC]

O_O Β Oh no...TIE fighter wreckage? Β Of course they don't know what it is, but that is a VERY bad sign...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheLordTaxus [2014-12-14 02:35:16 +0000 UTC]

If that is what I think it is this will end badly for the Federation. The Constitution class would not even be a match for an old Venator SD much less an Imperial II or a Tector Class ship.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Greyman01 In reply to TheLordTaxus [2014-12-21 05:56:06 +0000 UTC]

Um....no. Lasers would bounce off Star Trek shielding.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheLordTaxus In reply to Greyman01 [2014-12-21 13:04:07 +0000 UTC]

Turbo lasers are quite powerful and repeated hits could overload Star Trek shielding I think.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Greyman01 In reply to TheLordTaxus [2014-12-21 14:25:51 +0000 UTC]

I'm using tng for refrence but hey, 23rd century tech is diffrent, so idk.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

megadolon013 [2014-12-13 22:40:18 +0000 UTC]

Β Β Β  Romulan my foot.Β  Tie Fighter.Β  Reads imperial that equals trouble.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

4ELEVEN-IMAGES [2014-12-13 21:27:46 +0000 UTC]

nice

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Midway2009 [2014-12-13 20:37:19 +0000 UTC]

Awesome work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jonsan90040 [2014-12-13 16:17:56 +0000 UTC]

*waves his hand* these are not the aggressor's you are looking for! Move along!!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Hardcorev20 In reply to jonsan90040 [2017-11-10 03:50:38 +0000 UTC]

Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

unusualsuspex In reply to jonsan90040 [2014-12-13 16:44:20 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kittamaru [2014-12-13 15:28:55 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm... doth my eyes deceive me? Would that be the solar panel from a Sienar TIE/LN Fighter?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

TheLordTaxus In reply to Kittamaru [2014-12-14 02:29:45 +0000 UTC]

That is what I was thinking.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

unusualsuspex In reply to Kittamaru [2014-12-13 16:44:44 +0000 UTC]

Maybe...maybe

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kittamaru In reply to unusualsuspex [2014-12-13 18:45:31 +0000 UTC]

hehe... depending on the era these two timelines intersect, this could be bad for the Federation!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

unusualsuspex In reply to Kittamaru [2014-12-13 19:50:56 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

acerr85 [2014-12-13 14:46:47 +0000 UTC]

nice work tie fighter wreck?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PardotKynes [2014-12-13 13:07:27 +0000 UTC]

Oops!

Awkward!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DCJBeers [2014-12-13 12:37:52 +0000 UTC]

Fantastic job my friend!Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

timberfox15 [2014-12-13 11:16:26 +0000 UTC]

what can i say.... OH MY?!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

unusualsuspex In reply to timberfox15 [2014-12-13 12:53:30 +0000 UTC]

And the story shall continue....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0