Comments: 51
Roogna [2014-11-25 15:00:48 +0000 UTC]
that has to be one of the cutest ouroboros I've seen
π: 0 β©: 0
Locaris [2013-08-31 03:51:33 +0000 UTC]
I think that the running guy is going to have some trouble running when the dragon's spikes get stuck in the ground...
π: 0 β©: 0
xSamiamrg7x [2013-08-26 23:03:11 +0000 UTC]
I always thought that the uroboros represented something that foolishlyΒ hurts itself by existing, like how zombies eventually die outΒ by running out of humans.
π: 0 β©: 0
Nerohn [2013-04-25 20:07:47 +0000 UTC]
Excellent view on this! FMA brought me here xD makes since. Sweet picture btw!
π: 0 β©: 0
IAMANOTHERYOU [2013-02-10 17:13:33 +0000 UTC]
hehe, itΒ΄s funny :3
π: 0 β©: 0
CelestialDrake [2013-02-03 16:11:40 +0000 UTC]
Om nom nom
π: 0 β©: 0
Toen [2013-01-26 12:57:16 +0000 UTC]
The most cute Uroboros I've ever seen!
π: 0 β©: 0
Charlie-Lang [2013-01-20 09:12:27 +0000 UTC]
The ancient version of a loading symbol. Just imagine it spinning
π: 0 β©: 0
Malesx [2013-01-15 18:10:17 +0000 UTC]
very nice XD
π: 0 β©: 0
Tobi-or-not-Tobi [2013-01-13 20:37:24 +0000 UTC]
This is a shark Oroboros?
It is very cuuuute ^^!
π: 0 β©: 0
flickjovany [2013-01-11 10:05:29 +0000 UTC]
I do love this symbol but man is it overused in so much media. It's generally seen as the "Pure Evil" concept in most media and I wish it were depicted in a more natural manner.
π: 0 β©: 0
EarthRequiem [2013-01-10 04:40:24 +0000 UTC]
he looks so cute
and hi-five for matching up with homestuck (weather intentional or not)
π: 0 β©: 1
Kitsune-95 In reply to EarthRequiem [2013-01-11 15:26:23 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I don't think the weather is intentional. The weather can be very unpredictable, if I say so myself.
....in case you don't get it, there was a grammatical error. Sorry for being a douche in pointing that out, but it just bugs me.
π: 0 β©: 0
M3g4l0d0n [2013-01-10 00:31:58 +0000 UTC]
*Anything related to Gojira = Instant favorite.
π: 0 β©: 0
therealarien [2013-01-09 23:53:46 +0000 UTC]
It's like the Aussie hoop snake!
π: 0 β©: 0
Kaminarai [2013-01-09 22:55:18 +0000 UTC]
ha! this is great! did you have FMA in mind when you did this or is it just a coincidence?
π: 0 β©: 0
MrBoxerBriefs [2013-01-09 22:19:56 +0000 UTC]
That face the snake has =I cutest. THING. EVER
π: 0 β©: 0
Xeno667 [2013-01-09 22:05:54 +0000 UTC]
I don't need anyone else... I have... UROBOROS!
π: 0 β©: 0
flametheskull [2013-01-09 18:22:50 +0000 UTC]
I love this symbol.
π: 0 β©: 0
Kiptay [2013-01-09 17:36:49 +0000 UTC]
This guy reminds me of the Oozlum bird (or weejy weejy bird depending on the story) who's depiction is a bit more on the ridiculous side rather than symbolic. Basically, the bird flies in circles decreasing in size until it manages to fly up its own... self, and disappears.
Anyway, this was very informative and interesting to read, and the art is absolutely adorable!
π: 0 β©: 0
PropertyofLamb [2013-01-09 16:58:33 +0000 UTC]
It looks like a hoop-snake
π: 0 β©: 0
Vaxes In reply to JellyMonstah [2013-01-09 19:49:20 +0000 UTC]
Hamsteak?
π: 0 β©: 1
Vaxes In reply to JellyMonstah [2013-01-11 07:40:00 +0000 UTC]
Homestuck :I
π: 0 β©: 1
JellyMonstah In reply to Vaxes [2013-01-12 03:25:38 +0000 UTC]
Why yes, it is XD
π: 0 β©: 0
JayBrave [2013-01-09 16:04:47 +0000 UTC]
Are you going to try to complete the alphabet? Because That would be AMAZING!!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
WarriorNun [2013-01-09 15:51:02 +0000 UTC]
Fullmetal Alchemist!
π: 0 β©: 0
MakenTosch [2013-01-09 15:10:30 +0000 UTC]
Very nice depiction of the symbol.
I'm Gnostic myself and I like to throw in a little piece of info here. Gnostics, especially certain sects like Sethian Gnostics who believe to be the metaphorical descendents of the third child of Adam and Eve (Seth), perceive the serpent in the book of Genesis as a representative of the enlightened and not Satan masquerading as a snake like the Orthodox Christians want us to believe.
If you read the Book of Genesis on any mainstream Christian bible, you will notice that the serpent only wanted Adam & Eve to see the truth. The Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil represents moral boundaries. Those who eat the fruit would then have the power to know right from wrong, good from evil, and finally open their eyes to see that they are naked like animals and thus become human and ultimately one step closer to become like god.
The serpent is also said to be a representation of our savior Yeshua The Christos (Jesus The Christ) before coming back later on as a human in the Book of Mathew. Other Gnostic sects would sometimes refer to the serpent as a representation of another holy spirit besides Yeshua. There are various versions of the belief but the message remains the same. It was not the serpent who was evil... Jehovah is the one who is evil for trying to keep Adam & Eve (mankind) from knowing the truth that they themselves can be like god and finally return to the Father who all go to for perfection.
One additional note so readers won't get confused here.
From a Gnostic point of view, the creator god (Jehovah, Ialdabaoth, etc.) and the Father are two different entities. In fact, the Father is regarded by us Gnostics as the true father who is so ineffable that to describe what the father is would only be limiting the Father. It's not even clear what the Father's gender is (if any at all). The creator god in this case is then regarded as a lesser god who created an imperfect world out of his own jealousy of the Father.
π: 0 β©: 1
OkamiNagihime In reply to MakenTosch [2013-01-09 16:36:12 +0000 UTC]
I'm afraid you are taking the bible out of context. The serpent wasn't trying to get them to see the truth, because in truth, sin did not exist on earth yet. It was when they were deceived and disobeyed God, they created sin. And why would a human creation be able to be like God who is I flawed in any way, especially if they became flawed by sin? After all, being flawed is the absence of perfection.
If the serpent (it wasn't a snake yet) was Christ, why would he want to bring about the fall of his own people?
Please don't reference the bible if you are going to take it out of context.
π: 0 β©: 1
MakenTosch In reply to OkamiNagihime [2013-01-09 18:40:51 +0000 UTC]
I'm not here to debate with you nor with anyone else on this matter. After having this kind of discussion before with someone else who disagreed with me, I decided that debates like what you are trying to start belong to a more appropriate forum. Not in a place where art is discussed.
As for my comment, I am merely presenting details on the beliefs of those who believe in Gnosis (Greek for 'Knowledge'). I am not here to try to convert anyone or convince you to change your mind as your opinions are your opinions. If there is a disagreement between you and me on this, then so be it. Just let me speak my mind as I am letting you speak yours.
The artist of this drawing referenced Gnosticism in his drawing and thus I felt like contributing what I have learned about Gnosticism that pertains to this.
And in case anyone is interested to know, Gnosticism dates back all the way to just shortly after Yeshua was crucified as it was among many schools of thought on the matter of god and salvation. Unfortunately, much of what we like to know about ancient Gnostics was lost because the Orthodox Christians in those times practically exterminated almost all Gnostics beginning in around 200AD and progressing until centuries later. Ancient texts were lost as they were burned or otherwise destroyed by the Orthodoxy for their "Heretical" meanings. Anyone discovered to be a Gnostic was immediately executed. It wasn't until around 1947 when the Nag Hammadi library was discovered in some barren part of town in Egypt by a Muslim who was only looking for fertile soil. Today, a lot of Gnostics prefer to be solitary practitioners of their beliefs. And I wouldn't blame them considering our history.
π: 0 β©: 1
OkamiNagihime In reply to MakenTosch [2013-01-09 19:27:39 +0000 UTC]
I'm not trying to start a debate. You took the bible out of context when you cited the "modern bible" (btw, copies of the bible dating back even to the medieval times and the Dead Sea scrolls, along with today's bibles are 99 percent consistent with each other, the other one percent being the translation differences like thee to you. It's a statistic thing for that)
Making it not part of what you were stating about the gnostic belief system. It was your own input. I was defending the truth of my text is all, and simply saying not to take stuff out of context like that.
And btw, the dead sea scrolls date farther back than the beginning of Gnosticism, around 408 BC, way before Jesus. More around King David's time. If anyone was interested in knowing.
π: 0 β©: 1
MakenTosch In reply to OkamiNagihime [2013-01-09 20:13:47 +0000 UTC]
Hmm, perhaps I should've worded better what I wrote. Oh well. Moving on.
π: 0 β©: 1
aritogonzalez [2013-01-09 14:28:26 +0000 UTC]
Great!
π: 0 β©: 0
moxiv [2013-01-09 14:22:42 +0000 UTC]
I love this! ;~;
π: 0 β©: 0
HayabusaTaichou In reply to SealAwayHearts [2013-01-09 12:53:08 +0000 UTC]
Ouroboroses always make me think of Noein. Bloody animes and their clever use of mythological symbols.
π: 0 β©: 2
SealAwayHearts In reply to HayabusaTaichou [2013-01-12 05:33:22 +0000 UTC]
Though sometimes they misinterpret some signs from their original meaning. v_v
π: 0 β©: 0