HOME | DD

theory-of-everything β€” Superman in Samsara by-nc

Published: 2013-08-05 23:03:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 3234; Favourites: 94; Downloads: 52
Redirect to original
Description Something I did for my blog: www.theoryofeverythingcomics.c… . It was made for a little article comparing the constant revamping, rewriting, and relaunching of Superman and the DCU to reincarnation.

Basically, I'm trying to blend classic Curt Swan Superman with Tibetan Thangka paintings.
Related content
Comments: 22

Valaka4 [2024-05-24 12:52:17 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheAtomicDog [2021-07-27 04:42:53 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

angrybroom [2016-08-16 04:36:18 +0000 UTC]

Dude I seriously can't stress how awesome this is, and he has been (sort of) relaunched yet again!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

eye-of-tengri [2015-09-03 19:58:06 +0000 UTC]

This looked borderline sacrilegious at first, but I get it and I like the point about Superman you made on your blog. Nice concept.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

theory-of-everything In reply to eye-of-tengri [2015-09-04 00:14:16 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I'm glad my blog musings made sense to someone

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

amygdalon [2014-02-07 20:30:53 +0000 UTC]

β™₯

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

pytko3 [2013-11-05 04:41:54 +0000 UTC]

In the Dc universe, some Buddhists view Superman like this.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ziggyman [2013-11-01 17:40:17 +0000 UTC]

Trippy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ThatAnnoyingRabbit [2013-10-07 20:00:53 +0000 UTC]

lmao! this is awesome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

icyhugs [2013-09-07 10:28:25 +0000 UTC]

Then Wonder Woman must be the mercifulΒ AvalokiteΕ›vara/GuanYin Well, I mean the classic Wondy, not the nowadays Xena-Wondy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nestharon [2013-08-24 18:41:27 +0000 UTC]

A quite paradox and yet in some ways good concept, but this is my opinion.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

theory-of-everything In reply to Nestharon [2013-09-16 19:25:19 +0000 UTC]

There are several intimidating, warrior deities in Buddhism who are protectors of the dharma. Truth, Justice and the American way might not be the dharma... but then again, that really wasn't the point of the article.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nestharon In reply to theory-of-everything [2013-09-17 00:46:25 +0000 UTC]

You are the only one who knows the true idea of the art, and I just stated my opinion about your art

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JayBay15 [2013-08-21 16:47:46 +0000 UTC]

Very interesting interpretation.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fyrewoman [2013-08-20 15:23:54 +0000 UTC]

As a Buddhist I am LOVING THIS Β Β  Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AJthe90skid [2013-08-20 06:31:46 +0000 UTC]

fascinating

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

amygdalon [2013-08-18 16:03:34 +0000 UTC]

β™₯

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lonemtnwolf [2013-08-18 01:59:11 +0000 UTC]

O.O This is brilliant.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sunapati [2013-08-12 18:25:12 +0000 UTC]

ahahaha very funny

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

theory-of-everything In reply to Sunapati [2013-08-13 10:36:36 +0000 UTC]

I'm so glad you liked this. I'm a tad worried that someone might interpret this as disrespectful.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Sunapati In reply to theory-of-everything [2013-08-20 21:34:53 +0000 UTC]

Art is also laughing. We liked and we posted it on our blog.

Namaste

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DemonQueen17 [2013-08-06 01:20:52 +0000 UTC]

This is a very interesting concept. I like it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0