HOME | DD
THEJETTYJETSHOW — Birdie Sanders Kickstarter
#teeshirt #tshirt #tshirtdesign #jetkimchrea #berniesanders #berniesanders2016 #birdiesanders
Published: 2016-04-05 22:50:47 +0000 UTC; Views: 4883; Favourites: 109; Downloads: 72
Redirect to original
Description
Hey deviant and friends. I've opened a kickstarter to turn this into a t-shirt. Please check it out here! www.kickstarter.com/projects/5…Related content
Comments: 35
It's not too late. 2020 is another chance as long as we all vote in the primary.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I'm a bit behind, only caught this story today. Put a big smile on my face. Great work, saw a video of you sketching it on YouTube. All the best.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Bernie Sanders is the only legitimate candidate in the entire election this time. Hillary is not running for the people, she's running for the corporations that backs her (so they can get more tax cuts or weapon manufacturers who wants to extend the conflicts in the middle east, so they can sell their weapons). Donald Trump is running as a joke essentially (additionally, he has no chance of winning against Bernie or Hillary). Overall, Bernie is actually looking out for the people. On a side note, awesome drawing Jet
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Donald Trump "has no chance of winning against Bernie"? Excuse me while I stand in traffic over the idiocy of this comment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Watching way too much fox news there, buddy (or other propaganda). Here Bill O Reiley when learning about Bernie's results against the Republicans in the general election.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gp4ctp…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ironically enough, you post a link to an extremely far left YouTube channel. Your argument is null. Polls done by Gallup and Quinnipiac show he has no chance. Fuck off, guy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bill O Reiley said it himself... so... Also according to Quinnipac, it looks like Sander is going to win against Trump, Cruz and Kasich if nominated. Also, the numbers show landslide victories against Trump and Cruz. I don't know where you get your stats from, but from what I see, Sanders will likely beat the three. Also, I don't particularly know why you're getting so defensive for Trump who is just in the elections to see how many people he can fool. (which i do have to agree is pretty badass)
www.realclearpolitics.com/epol…
www.realclearpolitics.com/epol…
www.realclearpolitics.com/epol…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bill O'Reilly has not said anything of the sort LMAO. Actually, no news network has. Every leftist sees Clinton can beat him. Sanders is done. You're living under a rock guy lmao
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I never said Sanders is going to beat Clinton in the democratic primary. I'm merely talking about the polls and the hypothetical situation if Bernie Sander does clinch the democratic primary. Also, Bill O Reilley did read out the results of the polls which show Bernie has a good chance in the general election against all republican candidates. Also, pretty much all news networks are part of establishment politics. So, of course, they wouldn't talk about Bernie Sanders because they hate him. I have no idea what you're trying to say since the polls do show that Bernie will do well in a general election vs Trump, Cruz and Kasich.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You condemn Fox News, but suddenly you happen to claim to know what O'Reilly says? If Bernie can't even beat Clinton in delegate count (being almost 1,000 under), what chance would he have against the Republicans? I think you have them confused. You post links to far-left sites, and it's evident you get all your information from there. You're nothing more than uninformed, gullible liberal with no understanding of how politics or the economy work, and when you hear the snake that is Bernie Sanders say he's going to somehow make college free, you jump at the chance to blindly fall in behind him. You have no credibility with me, this conversation is nauseating and may God have mercy on your soul.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bernie's not going to win, that's clear. But, he's not losing by 1000, he's only losing by around 300 because super delegates vote after the pledged delegates are chosen. In the election in 2008, the superdelegates switched to Obama when he won the pledged delegates. Also, I don't know man, multiple websites show that Bernie beats the republicans in a General election. That is because he is able to get many of the independents unlike Hillary Clinton. Also, Gallup and Quinnipiac which you mentioned, basically says the exact same thing. Plus, the O Reilly thing is on the show and in the video I've shown, so... I think it's pretty conclusive. Also, America is the richest nation in the world, there is really no reason why other countries are able to make college free, but America is not. Honestly, I have nothing against you and I hope you have nothing against me. But, I don't think you should go around threatening people with your "god" (I honestly don't care, I don't believe in his or her or its existence), it makes moderately sensible religious people look bad.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
One in the hand is worth two in the (George) Bush.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Birds are limited to bird seed and whatever scrap food that they can find, that sounds like Socialism to me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Bernie is for the birds, as in only bird brains would vote for him. No offense.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
birds are pretty smart . . . so idk what your point is
plus clinton and trump are going to destroy america, glad i'm in australia tbh
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Doesn't Clinton wants to copy Australia's strict gun laws, though?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You can't base her abilities on one thing. She and Bill Clinton has a history of lying and deception. Also, Hillary is not for the people, she's for the corporations that give her money (use your brain, please). A politician that's so heavily influenced by corporations is clearly dangerous. Also, Bernie Sanders crushed her in the last 8 out of 9 states. So his chances are actually fairly decent and if he wins New York, he has a really good chance and they're having a debate in New York so, so he might actually win New York which was supposed to be for Hillary. The entire extablishment is against Bernie and he's actually doing very well, if you don't like the guy, you should at least commend him for the effort.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sanders would be worse for America than both Clinton and Obama. He's a socialist, and would have the working class people foot the bill for ALL his free stuff, putting the government in control of things it has no right to be meddling in.
The people he attracts have no idea how economics or capitalism really works, their just voting for all his 'free' garbage.
Those things he offers maybe be free now, but his supporters are still going to have to pay for it through his inflation of income taxes when they get older and have jobs. Not only are they going to be paying for their college, but for the college of millions of others.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Saying Bernie's plans are completely bogus shows that you haven't taken the time to see his side of the argument as many economists actually do side with Sanders. You can't just dismiss Bernie because he's a "socialist" without looking at his views. Plus if you look at the world, many other countries are able to afford Universal health care and free university (college in the US) tuition. Why is it that America, the richest nation in the world can't. Plus universal healthcare isn't "free garbage" unless you're a libertarian or friggin rich which most Americans are not seeing that there is a definite income inequality in the US. Bernie is also fighting against the corruption that runs within America. Corporations are buying politicians, using them to lower taxes or make laws in the interests of these big corporations and not the people (political corruption). Goldman Sachs and other banks got bailed out after the economic crash (sounds like they're getting some "free garbage" to me). Political corruption is perhaps one of the biggest problems with Hillary which is that she can be brought. That and the fact that she constantly flip flops. Also, many say that Hillary is better than Bernie in terms of foreign policies, but this is simply not the case. We can look at the Israel and Palestine conflict. Bernie proposes that we help both sides in order to reach peace whereas Netanyahu is alway right. That's just irresponsible in my eyes. That and the fact that she was on the side of invading Iraq whereas Bernie lead the opposition against it (she could have been neutral). Also, she's also going to be brought out by the weapon companies who wants her to prolong the wars in the middle east, so they can make money. So all in all, Bernie is essentially diverting the money from the super super rich back to the poor who deserve to have a chance to live and move up in society. Right now, you don't know how hard it is for a convict or a homeless person to actually get a job. Also, I don't know if you actually understand how the economy works, but the fact that there are plenty of economists who say Sander's plans means that it is clearly grounded in reality. Many of the things you're mentioning are mainly propaganda which is done by the corporate media which is part of the establishment and thus works for Hillary basically. And Bernie the outsider is hated by them because he's actually going to bring change (unlike Obama (he's ok, it's just that he didn't do enough)) and put an end to income inequality, corruption and help the enviroment more.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I believe in a society where everyone works for what they earn. If you work for it, then you deserve it. Disney didn't start out rich, in fact he started out poorer than a churchmouse when he first came to Hollywood.
If you take away the rich, all you will have is the middle class. Or rather, lower than middle class by the time he'll be through.
Companies have set up shop in other countries due to lower taxes their because it has already gotten so expensive there.
The richest people in this country pay over 87% of the income tax rate. If Bernie hike it more, they'll be essentially paying the government more money!
Right now the richest people in America today has the highest income tax rate of any people in the country.
Under Bernie's plan, we're going to see more money taken out of the middle class than what is being put in. What's the point of raising minimum wage to stimulate the economy when your just going to lose that extra pay to higher taxes?
The middle class will receive a 5% loss in their pay added on to what they already dish out to taxes and heath care now.
Who's to say if he was elected that he would be even able to get his plans to work? Setting up all he says would require votes from congress, which would mean dealing with his opponents, conservative republicans.
Sanders is what is to the Left what Trump is to the right. He's just saying what people want to hear to get elected, but both men would weaken America even more.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
He's not for taking away the rich necessarily, only balancing things out so poorer people can move up in society especially students. Also no matter how hard you work, there is really no reason why you should make 1000x more than someone else. The money isn't going anywhere and is actually damaging to the economy because many of the same rich people are putting the money overseas(just storing it) or they're out their corrupting politicians whereas the middle class actually uses the money on merchandise which means the money is put back into the economy. Most rich people don't care about the economy, they care about themselves. It's exactly what caused the market collapse of 2008, it's because of the irresponsible bankers on wall street. Also, "richest people has the highest income tax?" That's just foolish, do you suggest that the poorest people in America should pay the most. I'm sorry but, that statement was just absurd. The richest people could and should be paying the most tax and what Bernie proposes isn't actually that crazy. Many European countries have the same thing and have a much higher tax rate for the rich than America. Additionally, health care in America is a joke, to be honest. Obama care is the first step, but there needs to be a lot of work to make sure everyone gets the right to... I dunno... "live" or get proper medical treatment. Also, the 5% loss statistic that you threw out is complete BS because even Bernie has fully elaborated on that. Also, Bernie is not planning to be a pushover to the republicans, unlike Obama and Hillary (plus the republican party is a joke, look at their frontrunner, they'll destroy themselves because most young people are democrats). There will be a senate reform and shit will actually get done. Also, Hillary is not as electable as Bernie. There a high chance that she'd lose to Cruz and Kasich. She's probably going to beat Trump, but that's a mystery because the democrats who support Hillary are not that excited about her whereas pretty much all republicans will come out and vote against her and support Trump because they hate her. Overall Bernie is the more reasonable choice and if you try and attempt to take a look at what Bernie is saying, he might not be as bad in your mind.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I personally think, everyone rich or poor should pay the same amount in taxes. Level across the board. If you want equality, we should all pay equally.
Most European countries do not have the same problems as the U.S..
Countries with the free universal college, do not have the same problems we do. For example, many of the things that require a college diploma here in the states, do not require such in nations like Germany.
Also, the U.S. has the largest amount of college enlistments of any country in the world.
Germany is also the country with the highest tax rates in the world, which should say something.
Sanders keeps saying the government is rotten and corrupt, and his deals, if made reality, they actually would make the same government he's supposedly fighting, even more powerful over all classes of life.
Think of it. He'll raise taxes to fund for all his plans, this money is going to the very government he claims to be corrupt.
what has Sanders succeeded in doing politically anyway? Like Obama he's just a sudden upstart from nowhere with hardly any credentials other than being a senator from Vermont.
The democrats couldn't even get the single-payer health plan to work in his home state!
It just shows how out of touch younger voters are with reality to vote for a man who cannot even back up his promises.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's absurd and you know it. If you are indeed talking about a flat tax, then it'd clearly be unfair towards the poor. Here's a hypothetical situation if your views (ideas) come to fruition. Take 3 people, one who makes 5 billion $, one who make 50 thousand $ and one who make 5000 $. If you have a flat tax of 4000 $. The last guy is f-ed beyond belief and the billionaire won't even bat an eye. If you weren't talking about a flat tax (thank god), a same percentage tax would still be stupid. If it's 35 percent across the board. The billionaire would still have around 3.25 billion dollars and what do they do with it, put it oversees or corrupt politician (with a select few donating to charity). I believe as a society, we should be Utilitarian and maximize everyone's happiness. The billionaire would have more money than he can possibly spend in his life time, so what's the point. Also, you're starting to sound slightly Libertarian with your views, but don't worry, a lot of people are similar to you and worships business tycoons and rich people. But, it really doesn't make a lot of sense since you're probably not rich or anywhere rich yourself. You also have to take into the account that the people who get rich become rich from being in the American society (school, opportunities, getting lucky ect). Additionally, I believe that wanting to have more than everyone else is actually a mental disease and there are discussions about that. Also. your argument about Germany was a poor one because Germany is a great place to live and has high-quality schools and actual health care. Also, people need to pay taxes for things like infrastructure and health care to work. Also, Bernie Sanders is corrupt? Jokes. He has a history of 40 years or so of non-corruption, pretty much always taking the right side such as being against the Iraq war. Also, the taxes is going to be split fairly making the rich pay their fair share of taxes. Of course, the middle class is going to pay a bit more, but for the infrastructure that is going to be provided, it's clearly worth it. Also, he's going to reform the goverment that's why so many of the establishment is so scared and fighting against him because they might not have a job (cause they're corrupt) when he comes in. Also, "with hardly any credentials other than being a senator from Vermont", that sounds like some pretty big credentials to me, not to mention how in 1987, U.S. News & World Report r, ranked Sanders as one of America's best mayors.[76] As of 2013, Burlington was regarded as one of the most livable cities in the nation. Also, his past is full of activism and getting shit done. What has Hillary done, voting for the Iraq war, helping Bill in the jailing of so many blacks and corruption. She has plenty of experience of being a corrupt politician, that's for sure. You may think young people are foolish, but they are the futures of this world and country and they will fix the mistakes of your era. Mistakes such as global warming and corruption. I can probably argue with you for days and will come out on top.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
As the song goes, 'if 10% is good enough for Jesus, it ought to be enough for Uncle Sam'.
To me wanting what the rich guys have is defines greed more than the rich guys wanting to keep what they earned honestly.
Bernie Sanders didn't even get his first real paycheck until he was 40, and it took him 5 tries to finally get elected Senator. Four of those times he was leading his own political party.
He started out an independent, a third partyer, until the Democrats offered him a position as their candidate for Senate.
He spent over half his life not even paying taxes, let alone holding down any steady job. People in the old USSR would've called him a parasite.
Sanders spent most of his early 'career' being supported by government unemployment checks, and welfare benefits. He's never been part of the American middle class.
Sanders couldn't even get traction in the senate when it was controlled by the democrats. In all of his time in, he's only managed to get 3 laws passed, two renaming U.S. Postal Service offices in his home state of Vermont and one that increased the annual cost-of-living raise for veterans’ benefits, nothing at all related to his radical Marxist views.
He supported Bill Clinton's election in 1992, because he considered him 'the lesser of 2 evils'.
During his run for the 2006 senate, he got Democratic support from such individuals as Chuck Schumer, Harry Reid, Barack Obama, and Barbara Boxer, not to mention a relatively large donation from Hillary Clinton's Political Action Committee.
He may have been against the Iraq War on the surface, but he supported Bill Clinton in the 1999 War on Serbia, and voted for the 2001 Authorization Unilateral Military Force Against Terrorists (AUMF), which basically gave Bush the go ahead to attack Afghanistan. In 1998 he voted in favor for the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 which said: “It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime.”
So technically he did support the invasion of Iraq, by voting for the overthrowing of Hussein's regime, but no one ever talks about that.
He's as much to blame for the fighting in Iraq as Hillarious Clinton is.
It shows how much he is a party player too, because he only supported the idea of attacking Iraq when a Democrat was in the White House, but turned against it when aRepublican carried out the policy.
I'm 25, and I consider most of the people of my generation, young, stupid, and immature, especially myself.
I'd rather another Reagan like Ted Cruz, than an elderly Josef Stalin like Bernie Sanders.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yeah, aren't really any candidates in the election race I care for.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
