Comments: 9
Snofte [2010-12-23 21:00:04 +0000 UTC]
Cool"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Crookedblue [2010-12-23 18:18:27 +0000 UTC]
so pretty! i luv this
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
3Dave [2010-12-22 21:36:05 +0000 UTC]
The horse and the hair on the horse looks great. Overall it looks beautiful, but I believe the wings should be bigger and with smaller feathers. I like it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
3Dave In reply to sylki51 [2010-12-22 22:34:47 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome, and I'm glad you took it as it was meant. I would say this about framing of subjects: Just because you are taking what would be considered a "snapshot" of a subject, it doesn't mean that the whole subject has to be inside the frame. Take it like you were taking an actual close-up photograph of a Pegasus. You couldn't get the whole wings in the picture unless you had a wide angle lens. You don't have to have the whole wings in the picture for people to be able to tell that it is Pegasus. I know we would like to see the wings, but just as in real life, you wouldn't be able to be so close unless the photo was much wider. I guess I'm just trying to say, let the subject dictate the frame size, not the frame dictate the subject.
Also, I've never worked with Daz, but is there a way to tighten the tolerances of space between objects? The feathers look like they are too thick and don't touch each other. You know? Like when you look at the feathers on a bird, they sometimes overlap each other in places on the wings that they kind of blend in together. Really though, my opinion doesn't matter about the wings anyway. How do I know what the wings should look like on a fictional being? Ha ha.
Keep up the great work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
3Dave In reply to sylki51 [2010-12-23 14:39:58 +0000 UTC]
Glad to be of assistance. Especially to people who appreciate it like you.
Hugs back.
David
👍: 0 ⏩: 0