Comments: 13
SweMu In reply to 75thparellel [2012-08-13 11:55:22 +0000 UTC]
Hmm? Asking for a colored version or sumfin? Well it aint been made... yet :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
75thparellel In reply to SweMu [2012-08-14 01:24:14 +0000 UTC]
Nope, you said gun i said show! Its a gun show!
A coloured version would be nice though haha
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Strangerataru [2012-04-12 01:37:19 +0000 UTC]
That it is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TC2 [2012-04-12 01:13:47 +0000 UTC]
Also, I wasn't comfortable submitting my comment for critique. It had other values in there that I don't think applied to this drawing, such as originality, vision, and impact.
I can't give a 5 star on originality for a picture that's been done millions of times in this genre, so I didn't want to mess up your scores by trying to follow the Critique rule system. (which didn't allow me to leave any areas blank.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SweMu In reply to TC2 [2012-04-12 01:35:27 +0000 UTC]
Lol, well if you wanna leave a critique in the future then dont worry about such things. I could care less about score. Especially a rating of originality on something like this. It's all about the words. Thanks for the critique.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TC2 [2012-04-12 01:09:41 +0000 UTC]
Ignoring the troll,
The line art is really great and smooth, the realism in the veins is excellent and the proportion of the body is very realistic.
I don't think the foreshortening is exaggerated at all, but I will say that the eyes are very lifeless. They are very doll like and don't seem to have any personality, also the nose perspective is a little off. Technically, when you don't see the bridge of the nose it implies that the shot is head on, so to me it looks like the nose is facing forward even though the face itself is at an angle.
To fix this, I think you should add a line to imply the direction the nose if facing and adjust the right nostril accordingly.
Overall the anatomy looks great, really well done on the piece.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SweMu In reply to TC2 [2012-04-12 01:34:14 +0000 UTC]
I agree with you on the eyes. I have a hard time putting emotions into eyes and I have no idea how to improve it.
The nose bridge will be more important if I get around to coloring the picture.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
janosch14 [2012-04-11 23:33:49 +0000 UTC]
unless she's building worker there's no need
to look retarded like that
anyway, i don't know even a single one
real building worker looking like that
i don't say iam being gender or anti-fem
with that sayd
it' just retarded all in all men or women don't care
no human being NEEDS muscles like that
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░▒████▒█████▒██▒██▒░░░
░▒██▒░▒██░░█▒░░▒██▒░░░
░▒████▒█████▒██▒██▒░░░
░▒██▒░▒██░░█▒██▒████▒░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
chipperpip In reply to janosch14 [2012-04-12 00:17:17 +0000 UTC]
No, they don't need them. It's for aesthetic purposes. Did you stumble into this gallery by mistake or something? Most "building workers" don't remotely have physiques anything like bodybuilders, they have no need for the extremely low bodyfat, so your analogy doesn't even work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SweMu In reply to janosch14 [2012-04-11 23:45:40 +0000 UTC]
Fail is right, fail for being closed minded, fail for being incoherent, fail for being blocked.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
janosch14 In reply to janosch14 [2012-04-11 23:34:37 +0000 UTC]
apart from that, the line-art is well done
👍: 0 ⏩: 0